追求低尺度代表性:如何利用 CFD 设计疫苗剪切研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrea Albano, Silvio Colomba, Angelo Palmese, Jessica Salvadori, Lorenzo Mencuccini, Alessio Moriconi, Federica Bellato, Carmine Malzone, Stefania Berti, Marilena Paludi, Caterina Valoti, Giuseppe Panariello, Nicola Cozzolino, Carlo Pergola
{"title":"追求低尺度代表性:如何利用 CFD 设计疫苗剪切研究。","authors":"Andrea Albano, Silvio Colomba, Angelo Palmese, Jessica Salvadori, Lorenzo Mencuccini, Alessio Moriconi, Federica Bellato, Carmine Malzone, Stefania Berti, Marilena Paludi, Caterina Valoti, Giuseppe Panariello, Nicola Cozzolino, Carlo Pergola","doi":"10.1080/10837450.2024.2331243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work, we exploit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate stirred tank reactor (STR) process engineer parameters (PEP) and design a scale-down system (SDS) to be representative of the formulation and filling process steps for an Aluminum adjuvanted vaccine drug product (DP). To study the shear history in the SDS we used the concept of <i>number of passages</i>, combined with an appropriate stirring speed down scale strategy comprising of either (i) tip speed equivalence, widely used as a scale-up criterion for a shear-sensitive product, or (ii) rotating shear, a shear metric introduced by Metz and Otto in 1957 but never used as scaling criterion. The outcome of the CFD simulations shows that the tip equivalence generates a worst-case SDS in terms of shear, whereas the rotating shear scaling approach could be used to design a more representative SDS. We monitored the trend over time for \"<i>In Vitro</i> Relative Potency\" as DP Critical Quality Attribute for both scaling approaches, which highlighted the crucial role of choosing the appropriate scaling-down approach to be representative of the manufacturing scale during process characterization studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20004,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"300-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The quest for down scale representativeness: how to exploit CFD to design a shear study for vaccines.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Albano, Silvio Colomba, Angelo Palmese, Jessica Salvadori, Lorenzo Mencuccini, Alessio Moriconi, Federica Bellato, Carmine Malzone, Stefania Berti, Marilena Paludi, Caterina Valoti, Giuseppe Panariello, Nicola Cozzolino, Carlo Pergola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10837450.2024.2331243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this work, we exploit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate stirred tank reactor (STR) process engineer parameters (PEP) and design a scale-down system (SDS) to be representative of the formulation and filling process steps for an Aluminum adjuvanted vaccine drug product (DP). To study the shear history in the SDS we used the concept of <i>number of passages</i>, combined with an appropriate stirring speed down scale strategy comprising of either (i) tip speed equivalence, widely used as a scale-up criterion for a shear-sensitive product, or (ii) rotating shear, a shear metric introduced by Metz and Otto in 1957 but never used as scaling criterion. The outcome of the CFD simulations shows that the tip equivalence generates a worst-case SDS in terms of shear, whereas the rotating shear scaling approach could be used to design a more representative SDS. We monitored the trend over time for \\\"<i>In Vitro</i> Relative Potency\\\" as DP Critical Quality Attribute for both scaling approaches, which highlighted the crucial role of choosing the appropriate scaling-down approach to be representative of the manufacturing scale during process characterization studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"300-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2024.2331243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Development and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2024.2331243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们利用计算流体动力学(CFD)来评估搅拌槽反应器(STR)的工艺工程师参数(PEP),并设计了一个缩比系统(SDS)来代表铝佐剂疫苗药物产品(DP)的配制和灌装工艺步骤。为了研究 SDS 中的剪切历史,我们使用了通道数的概念,并结合适当的搅拌速度缩比策略,包括 i) 尖端速度等效(广泛用作剪切敏感产品的缩比标准)或 ii) 旋转剪切(Metz 和 Otto 于 1957 年推出的剪切指标,但从未用作缩比标准)。CFD 模拟结果表明,尖端等效产生了剪切力最差的 SDS,而旋转剪切力缩放方法可用于设计更具代表性的 SDS。我们监测了两种缩放方法中作为 DP 关键质量属性的 "体外相对效力 "随时间变化的趋势,这突出了在工艺表征研究中选择适当的缩放方法以代表生产规模的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The quest for down scale representativeness: how to exploit CFD to design a shear study for vaccines.

In this work, we exploit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to evaluate stirred tank reactor (STR) process engineer parameters (PEP) and design a scale-down system (SDS) to be representative of the formulation and filling process steps for an Aluminum adjuvanted vaccine drug product (DP). To study the shear history in the SDS we used the concept of number of passages, combined with an appropriate stirring speed down scale strategy comprising of either (i) tip speed equivalence, widely used as a scale-up criterion for a shear-sensitive product, or (ii) rotating shear, a shear metric introduced by Metz and Otto in 1957 but never used as scaling criterion. The outcome of the CFD simulations shows that the tip equivalence generates a worst-case SDS in terms of shear, whereas the rotating shear scaling approach could be used to design a more representative SDS. We monitored the trend over time for "In Vitro Relative Potency" as DP Critical Quality Attribute for both scaling approaches, which highlighted the crucial role of choosing the appropriate scaling-down approach to be representative of the manufacturing scale during process characterization studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Development & Technology publishes research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of conventional and novel drug delivery systems, emphasizing practical solutions and applications to theoretical and research-based problems. The journal aims to publish significant, innovative and original research to advance the frontiers of pharmaceutical development and technology. Through original articles, reviews (where prior discussion with the EIC is encouraged), short reports, book reviews and technical notes, Pharmaceutical Development & Technology covers aspects such as: -Preformulation and pharmaceutical formulation studies -Pharmaceutical materials selection and characterization -Pharmaceutical process development, engineering, scale-up and industrialisation, and process validation -QbD in the form a risk assessment and DoE driven approaches -Design of dosage forms and drug delivery systems -Emerging pharmaceutical formulation and drug delivery technologies with a focus on personalised therapies -Drug delivery systems research and quality improvement -Pharmaceutical regulatory affairs This journal will not consider for publication manuscripts focusing purely on clinical evaluations, botanicals, or animal models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信