易怒和失神症状之间有何联系?网络方法

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sonia Sistiaga, Wan-Ling Tseng, Lanting Zhang, Mandy Rossignol, Nellia Bellaert
{"title":"易怒和失神症状之间有何联系?网络方法","authors":"Sonia Sistiaga,&nbsp;Wan-Ling Tseng,&nbsp;Lanting Zhang,&nbsp;Mandy Rossignol,&nbsp;Nellia Bellaert","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Anhedonia and irritability are two prevalent symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that predict greater depression severity and poor outcomes, including suicidality. Although both symptoms have been proposed to result from paradoxical reward processing dysfunctions, the interactions between these symptoms remain unclear. Anhedonia is a multifaceted symptom reflecting impairments in multiple dimensions of reward processing (e.g., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort) across distinct reward types (e.g., food, sensory experiences, social activities, hobbies) that may differentially interact with irritability. This study investigated the complex associations between anhedonia and irritability using network analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 448, Mage = 33.29, SD = 14.58) reported their symptoms of irritability on the Brief Irritability Test (Holtzman et al., 2015) and anhedonia (i.e., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort dimensions across four reward types) on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (Rizvi et al., 2015). A regularized Gaussian Graphical Model was built to estimate the network structure between items.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Irritability was negatively related to willingness to expand effort to obtain food/drinks (estimate = −0.18), social activities (−0.13), and hobbies (−0.12) rewards. Irritability was positively associated with a desire for food/drinks (0.12).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Limitations</h3>\n \n <p>Only a small proportion (5.8%) of our sample was clinical and the study design was cross-sectional.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A specific link between irritability and the effort dimension of the hedonic response across three reward types was identified. Investigating effort expenditure deficits with experimental paradigms may help us understand the mechanisms underlying the comorbidity between irritability and anhedonia in the context of MDD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 7","pages":"1552-1567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How are irritability and anhedonia symptoms linked? A network approach\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Sistiaga,&nbsp;Wan-Ling Tseng,&nbsp;Lanting Zhang,&nbsp;Mandy Rossignol,&nbsp;Nellia Bellaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.23679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anhedonia and irritability are two prevalent symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that predict greater depression severity and poor outcomes, including suicidality. Although both symptoms have been proposed to result from paradoxical reward processing dysfunctions, the interactions between these symptoms remain unclear. Anhedonia is a multifaceted symptom reflecting impairments in multiple dimensions of reward processing (e.g., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort) across distinct reward types (e.g., food, sensory experiences, social activities, hobbies) that may differentially interact with irritability. This study investigated the complex associations between anhedonia and irritability using network analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 448, Mage = 33.29, SD = 14.58) reported their symptoms of irritability on the Brief Irritability Test (Holtzman et al., 2015) and anhedonia (i.e., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort dimensions across four reward types) on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (Rizvi et al., 2015). A regularized Gaussian Graphical Model was built to estimate the network structure between items.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Irritability was negatively related to willingness to expand effort to obtain food/drinks (estimate = −0.18), social activities (−0.13), and hobbies (−0.12) rewards. Irritability was positively associated with a desire for food/drinks (0.12).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Limitations</h3>\\n \\n <p>Only a small proportion (5.8%) of our sample was clinical and the study design was cross-sectional.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A specific link between irritability and the effort dimension of the hedonic response across three reward types was identified. Investigating effort expenditure deficits with experimental paradigms may help us understand the mechanisms underlying the comorbidity between irritability and anhedonia in the context of MDD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"80 7\",\"pages\":\"1552-1567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:失乐症和易激惹是重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的两种常见症状,可预示抑郁的严重程度和不良后果,包括自杀倾向。虽然这两种症状被认为是奖赏处理功能障碍的矛盾结果,但这些症状之间的相互作用仍不清楚。失乐症是一种多方面的症状,反映了不同奖赏类型(如食物、感官体验、社交活动、业余爱好)的奖赏加工在多个方面(如快乐、欲望、动机和努力)的障碍,这些障碍可能会与易激惹产生不同程度的相互作用。本研究利用网络分析法研究了失乐症与易怒之间的复杂关联:参与者(N = 448,Mage = 33.29,SD = 14.58)在简易易怒测试(Brief Irritability Test,Holtzman等人,2015年)中报告了他们的易怒症状,并在维度失乐症评分量表(Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale,Rizvi等人,2015年)中报告了他们的失乐症(即四种奖励类型中的快乐、欲望、动机和努力维度)。我们建立了一个正则化高斯图形模型来估计项目之间的网络结构:易激惹性与为获得食物/饮料(估计值=-0.18)、社交活动(-0.13)和业余爱好(-0.12)而付出更多努力的意愿呈负相关。烦躁与对食物/饮料的渴望呈正相关(0.12):局限性:我们的样本中只有一小部分(5.8%)是临床样本,而且研究设计是横断面的:结论:在三种奖赏类型中,易怒与享乐反应的努力维度之间存在特定联系。通过实验范式来研究努力支出的缺陷,可能有助于我们了解在 MDD 的背景下,易激惹和失乐症之间的共病机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How are irritability and anhedonia symptoms linked? A network approach

Background

Anhedonia and irritability are two prevalent symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that predict greater depression severity and poor outcomes, including suicidality. Although both symptoms have been proposed to result from paradoxical reward processing dysfunctions, the interactions between these symptoms remain unclear. Anhedonia is a multifaceted symptom reflecting impairments in multiple dimensions of reward processing (e.g., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort) across distinct reward types (e.g., food, sensory experiences, social activities, hobbies) that may differentially interact with irritability. This study investigated the complex associations between anhedonia and irritability using network analysis.

Method

Participants (N = 448, Mage = 33.29, SD = 14.58) reported their symptoms of irritability on the Brief Irritability Test (Holtzman et al., 2015) and anhedonia (i.e., pleasure, desire, motivation, and effort dimensions across four reward types) on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (Rizvi et al., 2015). A regularized Gaussian Graphical Model was built to estimate the network structure between items.

Results

Irritability was negatively related to willingness to expand effort to obtain food/drinks (estimate = −0.18), social activities (−0.13), and hobbies (−0.12) rewards. Irritability was positively associated with a desire for food/drinks (0.12).

Limitations

Only a small proportion (5.8%) of our sample was clinical and the study design was cross-sectional.

Conclusion

A specific link between irritability and the effort dimension of the hedonic response across three reward types was identified. Investigating effort expenditure deficits with experimental paradigms may help us understand the mechanisms underlying the comorbidity between irritability and anhedonia in the context of MDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信