人工智能在妊娠头三个月成像中的应用:系统综述。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1159/000538243
Emma Umans, Kobe Dewilde, Helena Williams, Jan Deprest, Thierry Van den Bosch
{"title":"人工智能在妊娠头三个月成像中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Emma Umans, Kobe Dewilde, Helena Williams, Jan Deprest, Thierry Van den Bosch","doi":"10.1159/000538243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy offers an early screening tool to identify high risk pregnancies. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have the potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and assist the clinician in early risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the use of AI in imaging in the first trimester of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review by searching in computerized databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from inception to January 2024. Full-text peer-reviewed journal publications written in English on the evaluation of AI in first-trimester pregnancy imaging were included. Review papers, conference abstracts, posters, animal studies, non-English and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed by using PROBAST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,595 non-duplicated records screened, 27 studies were included. Twelve studies focussed on segmentation, 8 on plane detection, 6 on image classification, and one on both segmentation and classification. Five studies included fetuses with a gestational age of less than 10 weeks. The size of the datasets was relatively small as 16 studies included less than 1,000 cases. The models were evaluated by different metrics. Duration to run the algorithm was reported in 12 publications and ranged between less than one second and 14 min. Only one study was externally validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the included algorithms reported a good performance in a research setting on testing datasets, further research and collaboration between AI experts and clinicians is needed before implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"343-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Imaging in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Umans, Kobe Dewilde, Helena Williams, Jan Deprest, Thierry Van den Bosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy offers an early screening tool to identify high risk pregnancies. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have the potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and assist the clinician in early risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the use of AI in imaging in the first trimester of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review by searching in computerized databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from inception to January 2024. Full-text peer-reviewed journal publications written in English on the evaluation of AI in first-trimester pregnancy imaging were included. Review papers, conference abstracts, posters, animal studies, non-English and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed by using PROBAST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,595 non-duplicated records screened, 27 studies were included. Twelve studies focussed on segmentation, 8 on plane detection, 6 on image classification, and one on both segmentation and classification. Five studies included fetuses with a gestational age of less than 10 weeks. The size of the datasets was relatively small as 16 studies included less than 1,000 cases. The models were evaluated by different metrics. Duration to run the algorithm was reported in 12 publications and ranged between less than one second and 14 min. Only one study was externally validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the included algorithms reported a good performance in a research setting on testing datasets, further research and collaboration between AI experts and clinicians is needed before implementation in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"343-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:妊娠头三个月的超声波检查是识别高风险妊娠的早期筛查工具。人工智能(AI)算法有可能提高诊断的准确性,并帮助临床医生进行早期风险分层。目的:对人工智能在妊娠头三个月超声波检查中的应用进行系统性综述:方法:我们通过搜索计算机数据库 Pubmed、Embase 和 Google Scholar(从开始到 2024 年 1 月)进行了系统性文献综述。全文收录了以英文撰写的同行评审期刊出版物,内容涉及妊娠头三个月成像中人工智能的评估。综述论文、会议摘要、海报、动物研究、非英语和非同行评审文章均被排除在外。使用PROBAST对偏倚风险进行评估:在筛选出的 1595 条非重复记录中,共纳入了 27 项研究。其中 12 项研究侧重于分割,8 项研究侧重于平面检测,6 项研究侧重于图像分类,1 项研究同时侧重于分割和分类。五项研究包括胎龄小于十周的胎儿。数据集的规模相对较小,有 16 项研究包含了不到 1000 个病例。这些模型通过不同的指标进行评估。有 12 项研究报告了运行算法所需的时间,从不到一秒到 14 分钟不等。只有一项研究经过了外部验证:结论:尽管所纳入的算法在测试数据集的研究环境中表现良好,但在临床实践中实施之前,人工智能专家和临床医生之间还需要进一步的研究和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence in Imaging in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Ultrasonography in the first trimester of pregnancy offers an early screening tool to identify high risk pregnancies. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have the potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and assist the clinician in early risk stratification.

Objective: The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the use of AI in imaging in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review by searching in computerized databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from inception to January 2024. Full-text peer-reviewed journal publications written in English on the evaluation of AI in first-trimester pregnancy imaging were included. Review papers, conference abstracts, posters, animal studies, non-English and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed by using PROBAST.

Results: Of the 1,595 non-duplicated records screened, 27 studies were included. Twelve studies focussed on segmentation, 8 on plane detection, 6 on image classification, and one on both segmentation and classification. Five studies included fetuses with a gestational age of less than 10 weeks. The size of the datasets was relatively small as 16 studies included less than 1,000 cases. The models were evaluated by different metrics. Duration to run the algorithm was reported in 12 publications and ranged between less than one second and 14 min. Only one study was externally validated.

Conclusion: Even though the included algorithms reported a good performance in a research setting on testing datasets, further research and collaboration between AI experts and clinicians is needed before implementation in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信