对猫科动物股骨和骨盆整合模式的新认识。

IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Quentin Cosnefroy, Gilles Berillon, Emmanuel Gilissen, Pauline Brige, Kathia Chaumoître, Franck Lamberton, François Marchal
{"title":"对猫科动物股骨和骨盆整合模式的新认识。","authors":"Quentin Cosnefroy,&nbsp;Gilles Berillon,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gilissen,&nbsp;Pauline Brige,&nbsp;Kathia Chaumoître,&nbsp;Franck Lamberton,&nbsp;François Marchal","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.24931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Integration reflects the level of coordinated variation of the phenotype. The integration of postcranial elements can be studied from a functional perspective, especially with regards to locomotion. This study investigates the link between locomotion, femoral structural properties, and femur-pelvis complex morphology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We measured (1) morphological integration between femoral and pelvic morphologies using geometric morphometrics, and (2) covariation between femoral/pelvic morphologies and femoral diaphyseal cross-sectional properties, which we defined as morpho-structural integration. Morphological and morpho-structural integration patterns were measured among humans (<i>n</i> = 19), chimpanzees and bonobos (<i>n</i> = 16), and baboons (<i>n</i> = 14), whose locomotion are distinct.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baboons show the highest magnitude of morphological integration and the lowest of morpho-structural integration. Chimpanzees and bonobos show intermediate magnitude of morphological and morpho-structural integration. Yet, body size seems to have a considerable influence on both integration patterns, limiting the interpretations. Finally, humans present the lowest morphological integration and the highest morpho-structural integration between femoral morphology and structural properties but not between pelvic morphology and femur.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Morphological and morpho-structural integration depict distinct strategies among the samples. A strong morphological integration among baboon's femur-pelvis module might highlight evidence for long-term adaptation to quadrupedalism. In humans, it is likely that distinct selective pressures associated with the respective function of the pelvis and the femur tend to decrease morphological integration. Conversely, high mechanical loading on the hindlimbs during bipedal locomotion might result in specific combination of structural and morphological features within the femur.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New insights into patterns of integration in the femur and pelvis among catarrhines\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Cosnefroy,&nbsp;Gilles Berillon,&nbsp;Emmanuel Gilissen,&nbsp;Pauline Brige,&nbsp;Kathia Chaumoître,&nbsp;Franck Lamberton,&nbsp;François Marchal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajpa.24931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Integration reflects the level of coordinated variation of the phenotype. The integration of postcranial elements can be studied from a functional perspective, especially with regards to locomotion. This study investigates the link between locomotion, femoral structural properties, and femur-pelvis complex morphology.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We measured (1) morphological integration between femoral and pelvic morphologies using geometric morphometrics, and (2) covariation between femoral/pelvic morphologies and femoral diaphyseal cross-sectional properties, which we defined as morpho-structural integration. Morphological and morpho-structural integration patterns were measured among humans (<i>n</i> = 19), chimpanzees and bonobos (<i>n</i> = 16), and baboons (<i>n</i> = 14), whose locomotion are distinct.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baboons show the highest magnitude of morphological integration and the lowest of morpho-structural integration. Chimpanzees and bonobos show intermediate magnitude of morphological and morpho-structural integration. Yet, body size seems to have a considerable influence on both integration patterns, limiting the interpretations. Finally, humans present the lowest morphological integration and the highest morpho-structural integration between femoral morphology and structural properties but not between pelvic morphology and femur.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Morphological and morpho-structural integration depict distinct strategies among the samples. A strong morphological integration among baboon's femur-pelvis module might highlight evidence for long-term adaptation to quadrupedalism. In humans, it is likely that distinct selective pressures associated with the respective function of the pelvis and the femur tend to decrease morphological integration. Conversely, high mechanical loading on the hindlimbs during bipedal locomotion might result in specific combination of structural and morphological features within the femur.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24931\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:整合反映了表型的协调变异水平。可以从功能角度研究颅后元素的整合,尤其是运动方面。本研究探讨了运动、股骨结构特性和股骨盆复合体形态之间的联系:我们使用几何形态计量学测量了(1)股骨和骨盆形态之间的形态整合,以及(2)股骨/骨盆形态与股骨骺横截面特性之间的共变,我们将其定义为形态-结构整合。我们对人类(n = 19)、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩(n = 16)以及狒狒(n = 14)的形态和形态-结构整合模式进行了测量,这些动物的运动方式各不相同:结果:狒狒的形态整合度最高,而形态结构整合度最低。黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩的形态和形态结构整合程度居中。然而,体型似乎对这两种整合模式都有相当大的影响,从而限制了对它们的解释。最后,人类的股骨形态与结构特性之间的形态整合度最低,而骨盆形态与股骨之间的形态结构整合度最高:讨论:形态学和形态-结构整合描绘了不同样本之间不同的策略。狒狒的股骨-骨盆模块之间的形态整合性很强,这可能是长期适应四足运动的证据。在人类中,与骨盆和股骨各自功能相关的不同选择压力可能会降低形态整合。相反,两足运动时后肢承受的高机械负荷可能会导致股骨结构和形态特征的特殊组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New insights into patterns of integration in the femur and pelvis among catarrhines

Objectives

Integration reflects the level of coordinated variation of the phenotype. The integration of postcranial elements can be studied from a functional perspective, especially with regards to locomotion. This study investigates the link between locomotion, femoral structural properties, and femur-pelvis complex morphology.

Materials and Methods

We measured (1) morphological integration between femoral and pelvic morphologies using geometric morphometrics, and (2) covariation between femoral/pelvic morphologies and femoral diaphyseal cross-sectional properties, which we defined as morpho-structural integration. Morphological and morpho-structural integration patterns were measured among humans (n = 19), chimpanzees and bonobos (n = 16), and baboons (n = 14), whose locomotion are distinct.

Results

Baboons show the highest magnitude of morphological integration and the lowest of morpho-structural integration. Chimpanzees and bonobos show intermediate magnitude of morphological and morpho-structural integration. Yet, body size seems to have a considerable influence on both integration patterns, limiting the interpretations. Finally, humans present the lowest morphological integration and the highest morpho-structural integration between femoral morphology and structural properties but not between pelvic morphology and femur.

Discussion

Morphological and morpho-structural integration depict distinct strategies among the samples. A strong morphological integration among baboon's femur-pelvis module might highlight evidence for long-term adaptation to quadrupedalism. In humans, it is likely that distinct selective pressures associated with the respective function of the pelvis and the femur tend to decrease morphological integration. Conversely, high mechanical loading on the hindlimbs during bipedal locomotion might result in specific combination of structural and morphological features within the femur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信