{"title":"停止正在进行的脱钩,重新启动中美科学合作","authors":"Li Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study reveals that, following bilateral reduced international visitation and academic exchange, Sino-American scientific collaboration is positioned at a turning point in a declining course. American international students originating from China have declined by nearly 22 %, and American students studying in China plummeted to 1.8 % of the number in 2018–2019. US-China interdependence in scientific collaboration has also reduced remarkably. At the same time, the concentration of influential research collaborated between the United States and China is consistently greater than both nations’ research outputs. Following the discussion of possible substitutes and the roles of American and Chinese researchers in global basic science and emerging issues, I argue that the two nations are so entwined in scientific collaboration that an adversarial rivalry perspective misses much of reality. In the face of rising uncertainties and global disasters, humanity does not have time to waste on nationalistic competitions. It is time for visionary leadership from both countries to promote intellectual exchange and scientific collaboration to address pressing global challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 101521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Halt the ongoing decoupling and reboot US-China scientific collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Li Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study reveals that, following bilateral reduced international visitation and academic exchange, Sino-American scientific collaboration is positioned at a turning point in a declining course. American international students originating from China have declined by nearly 22 %, and American students studying in China plummeted to 1.8 % of the number in 2018–2019. US-China interdependence in scientific collaboration has also reduced remarkably. At the same time, the concentration of influential research collaborated between the United States and China is consistently greater than both nations’ research outputs. Following the discussion of possible substitutes and the roles of American and Chinese researchers in global basic science and emerging issues, I argue that the two nations are so entwined in scientific collaboration that an adversarial rivalry perspective misses much of reality. In the face of rising uncertainties and global disasters, humanity does not have time to waste on nationalistic competitions. It is time for visionary leadership from both countries to promote intellectual exchange and scientific collaboration to address pressing global challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Informetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000348\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Halt the ongoing decoupling and reboot US-China scientific collaboration
This study reveals that, following bilateral reduced international visitation and academic exchange, Sino-American scientific collaboration is positioned at a turning point in a declining course. American international students originating from China have declined by nearly 22 %, and American students studying in China plummeted to 1.8 % of the number in 2018–2019. US-China interdependence in scientific collaboration has also reduced remarkably. At the same time, the concentration of influential research collaborated between the United States and China is consistently greater than both nations’ research outputs. Following the discussion of possible substitutes and the roles of American and Chinese researchers in global basic science and emerging issues, I argue that the two nations are so entwined in scientific collaboration that an adversarial rivalry perspective misses much of reality. In the face of rising uncertainties and global disasters, humanity does not have time to waste on nationalistic competitions. It is time for visionary leadership from both countries to promote intellectual exchange and scientific collaboration to address pressing global challenges.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.