锂治疗监测的现有技术和新兴技术:范围审查。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835
Santiago Pedraza-Sanabria, Seetal Dodd, Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Karen Whittingham, Rosa-Helena Bustos
{"title":"锂治疗监测的现有技术和新兴技术:范围审查。","authors":"Santiago Pedraza-Sanabria, Seetal Dodd, Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Karen Whittingham, Rosa-Helena Bustos","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Lithium is an effective psychoactive drug. It has a narrow therapeutic margin, with subtherapeutic levels or intoxication commonly occurring. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of lithium has several barriers. This scoping review aims to describe and analyze existing and emerging technologies for lithium TDM and to describe the lithium quantification parameters (precision, accuracy, detection limit) attributed to each technology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that described lithium quantification and complied with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were included. Articles selection was conducted by 2 researchers. Good precision was defined if its relative standard deviation <3%; acceptable, from 3% to 5%; and low, >5%. Accuracy was considered good if the error <5%; acceptable, 5%1 to 0%; and low if it was >10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2008 articles found, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies concerned laboratory devices, in which precision was found to be low in one third of cases, and half had good precision. Accuracy of one third was good, another third was low, and the remaining third did not report accuracy. The other 8 studies concerned portable devices, in which precision was low in more than 60% of the cases and good in 25% of the studies. Accuracy was low in 50% of the cases, and good in just over a third. Limits of detection included the therapeutic range of lithium in all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among emerging technologies for lithium TDM, precision and accuracy remain a challenge, particularly for portable devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existing and Emerging Technologies for Therapeutic Monitoring of Lithium: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Pedraza-Sanabria, Seetal Dodd, Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Karen Whittingham, Rosa-Helena Bustos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Lithium is an effective psychoactive drug. It has a narrow therapeutic margin, with subtherapeutic levels or intoxication commonly occurring. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of lithium has several barriers. This scoping review aims to describe and analyze existing and emerging technologies for lithium TDM and to describe the lithium quantification parameters (precision, accuracy, detection limit) attributed to each technology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that described lithium quantification and complied with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were included. Articles selection was conducted by 2 researchers. Good precision was defined if its relative standard deviation <3%; acceptable, from 3% to 5%; and low, >5%. Accuracy was considered good if the error <5%; acceptable, 5%1 to 0%; and low if it was >10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2008 articles found, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies concerned laboratory devices, in which precision was found to be low in one third of cases, and half had good precision. Accuracy of one third was good, another third was low, and the remaining third did not report accuracy. The other 8 studies concerned portable devices, in which precision was low in more than 60% of the cases and good in 25% of the studies. Accuracy was low in 50% of the cases, and good in just over a third. Limits of detection included the therapeutic range of lithium in all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among emerging technologies for lithium TDM, precision and accuracy remain a challenge, particularly for portable devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"291-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:锂是一种有效的精神活性药物。它的治疗范围很窄,通常会出现治疗水平以下或中毒的情况。锂的治疗药物监测(TDM)存在一些障碍。本范围综述旨在描述和分析现有的和新兴的锂 TDM 技术,并描述每种技术的锂定量参数(精确度、准确度、检测限):方法:检索了 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar。方法:检索了PubM、Scopus、Web Science和Googlecholar,纳入了描述锂定量且符合PRISMA-ScR指南的研究。文章由两名研究人员进行筛选。如果相对标准偏差为 5%,精确度即为良好。如果误差为 10%,则认为准确性良好:在找到的 2008 篇文章中,有 22 篇符合纳入标准。其中 14 项研究涉及实验室设备,发现其中三分之一的精确度较低,一半的精确度较高。三分之一的准确度良好,另外三分之一的准确度较低,剩下的三分之一没有报告准确度。另外 8 项研究涉及便携式设备,其中超过 60% 的研究精确度较低,25% 的研究精确度较高。准确度低的占 50%,准确度高的略高于三分之一。所有研究的检测限均包括锂的治疗范围:结论:在新出现的锂 TDM 技术中,精确度和准确性仍是一项挑战,尤其是便携式设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Existing and Emerging Technologies for Therapeutic Monitoring of Lithium: A Scoping Review.

Background/purpose: Lithium is an effective psychoactive drug. It has a narrow therapeutic margin, with subtherapeutic levels or intoxication commonly occurring. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of lithium has several barriers. This scoping review aims to describe and analyze existing and emerging technologies for lithium TDM and to describe the lithium quantification parameters (precision, accuracy, detection limit) attributed to each technology.

Method: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that described lithium quantification and complied with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were included. Articles selection was conducted by 2 researchers. Good precision was defined if its relative standard deviation <3%; acceptable, from 3% to 5%; and low, >5%. Accuracy was considered good if the error <5%; acceptable, 5%1 to 0%; and low if it was >10%.

Results: Of the 2008 articles found, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies concerned laboratory devices, in which precision was found to be low in one third of cases, and half had good precision. Accuracy of one third was good, another third was low, and the remaining third did not report accuracy. The other 8 studies concerned portable devices, in which precision was low in more than 60% of the cases and good in 25% of the studies. Accuracy was low in 50% of the cases, and good in just over a third. Limits of detection included the therapeutic range of lithium in all studies.

Conclusions: Among emerging technologies for lithium TDM, precision and accuracy remain a challenge, particularly for portable devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信