Samir Ghandour, Atta Taseh, Walter Sussman, Daniel Guss, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Ashim Gupta, Gregory Waryasz
{"title":"病例报告:便携式手持超声波有助于足部关节病变的关节内注射。","authors":"Samir Ghandour, Atta Taseh, Walter Sussman, Daniel Guss, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Ashim Gupta, Gregory Waryasz","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1254216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-articular injections are commonly used to manage joint pathologies, including osteoarthritis. While conventional ultrasound (US) guidance has generally improved intra-articular injection accuracy, forefoot and midfoot joint interventions are still often performed without imaging guidance. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy of office-based, portable ultrasound (P-US) guided intra-articular injections for forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various degenerative pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of consecutive patients who underwent P-US guided intra-articular injections following a chief complaint of forefoot or midfoot joint pain. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre-injection and at 3 months follow-up. The procedure was performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon using a linear array transducer for guidance, and a 25-gauge needle was used to inject a combination of 2 cc 1% lidocaine and 12 cc of Kenalog (40 mg/ml). Complications and pain scores were analyzed using a paired <i>t</i>-test and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 16 patients, 31% male and 69% female with a mean age (±SD) of 61.31 (±12.04) years. None of the patients experienced immediate complications following the intervention. The mean pre-injection VAS score was significantly reduced from 5.21 (±2.04) to a mean of 0.50 (±1.32) at 3 months follow-up (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Thirteen patients reported complete resolution of pain at the 3-month follow-up. No adverse events were reported throughout the duration of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests P-US-guided intra-articular injections offer a safe and effective method for managing forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various arthritic pathologies. Further research is warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and comparative effectiveness of P-US-guided injections in larger patient cohorts as compared to non-image guided injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"5 ","pages":"1254216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Report: Portable handheld ultrasound facilitates intra-articular injections in articular foot pathologies.\",\"authors\":\"Samir Ghandour, Atta Taseh, Walter Sussman, Daniel Guss, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Ashim Gupta, Gregory Waryasz\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2024.1254216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-articular injections are commonly used to manage joint pathologies, including osteoarthritis. While conventional ultrasound (US) guidance has generally improved intra-articular injection accuracy, forefoot and midfoot joint interventions are still often performed without imaging guidance. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy of office-based, portable ultrasound (P-US) guided intra-articular injections for forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various degenerative pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of consecutive patients who underwent P-US guided intra-articular injections following a chief complaint of forefoot or midfoot joint pain. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre-injection and at 3 months follow-up. The procedure was performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon using a linear array transducer for guidance, and a 25-gauge needle was used to inject a combination of 2 cc 1% lidocaine and 12 cc of Kenalog (40 mg/ml). Complications and pain scores were analyzed using a paired <i>t</i>-test and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 16 patients, 31% male and 69% female with a mean age (±SD) of 61.31 (±12.04) years. None of the patients experienced immediate complications following the intervention. The mean pre-injection VAS score was significantly reduced from 5.21 (±2.04) to a mean of 0.50 (±1.32) at 3 months follow-up (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Thirteen patients reported complete resolution of pain at the 3-month follow-up. No adverse events were reported throughout the duration of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests P-US-guided intra-articular injections offer a safe and effective method for managing forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various arthritic pathologies. Further research is warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and comparative effectiveness of P-US-guided injections in larger patient cohorts as compared to non-image guided injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1254216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10937340/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1254216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1254216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关节内注射常用于治疗关节病变,包括骨关节炎。虽然传统的超声波(US)引导已普遍提高了关节内注射的准确性,但前足部和中足部关节的介入治疗仍经常在没有成像引导的情况下进行。本试验研究旨在评估在诊室便携式超声波(P-US)引导下进行关节内注射治疗各种退行性病变引起的前足和中足关节疼痛的疗效:对一系列主诉前足或中足关节疼痛并在 P-US 引导下接受关节内注射的连续患者进行了回顾性分析。患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)报告了注射前和随访 3 个月时的疼痛程度。手术由经验丰富的足踝外科医生进行,使用线性阵列传感器进行引导,并使用 25 号针头注射 2 cc 1%利多卡因和 12 cc Kenalog(40 mg/ml)。并发症和疼痛评分采用配对 t 检验和 P 结果分析:我们共纳入了 16 名患者,其中 31% 为男性,69% 为女性,平均年龄(±SD)为 61.31(±12.04)岁。没有一名患者在干预后立即出现并发症。注射前的平均 VAS 评分从 5.21(±2.04)分明显降低到随访 3 个月时的平均 0.50(±1.32)分(P 结论:PUS-MRI 是一种有效的治疗方法:这项试验性研究表明,P-US 引导下的关节内注射是治疗各种关节炎引起的前足和中足关节疼痛的一种安全有效的方法。与非图像引导注射相比,有必要在更大的患者群体中开展进一步研究,以确定 P-US 引导注射的长期疗效和比较效果。
Case Report: Portable handheld ultrasound facilitates intra-articular injections in articular foot pathologies.
Background: Intra-articular injections are commonly used to manage joint pathologies, including osteoarthritis. While conventional ultrasound (US) guidance has generally improved intra-articular injection accuracy, forefoot and midfoot joint interventions are still often performed without imaging guidance. This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy of office-based, portable ultrasound (P-US) guided intra-articular injections for forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various degenerative pathologies.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of consecutive patients who underwent P-US guided intra-articular injections following a chief complaint of forefoot or midfoot joint pain. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre-injection and at 3 months follow-up. The procedure was performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon using a linear array transducer for guidance, and a 25-gauge needle was used to inject a combination of 2 cc 1% lidocaine and 12 cc of Kenalog (40 mg/ml). Complications and pain scores were analyzed using a paired t-test and p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: We included 16 patients, 31% male and 69% female with a mean age (±SD) of 61.31 (±12.04) years. None of the patients experienced immediate complications following the intervention. The mean pre-injection VAS score was significantly reduced from 5.21 (±2.04) to a mean of 0.50 (±1.32) at 3 months follow-up (P < 0.001). Thirteen patients reported complete resolution of pain at the 3-month follow-up. No adverse events were reported throughout the duration of the study.
Conclusion: This pilot study suggests P-US-guided intra-articular injections offer a safe and effective method for managing forefoot and midfoot joint pain caused by various arthritic pathologies. Further research is warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and comparative effectiveness of P-US-guided injections in larger patient cohorts as compared to non-image guided injections.