视力和眼科护理的临床结果测量。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Luke Leidy , Anna Dickinson , Pradeep Ramulu , Joshua Ehrlich , Mona A. Kaleem
{"title":"视力和眼科护理的临床结果测量。","authors":"Luke Leidy ,&nbsp;Anna Dickinson ,&nbsp;Pradeep Ramulu ,&nbsp;Joshua Ehrlich ,&nbsp;Mona A. Kaleem","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditionally, clinical outcome assessments have focused on the patient’s perspective through patient-reported outcome assessments; however, given the complexity, integration, and interactions of various participants within the clinical ophthalmology setting, we propose that additional diverse clinical perspectives should be explored in order to appreciate fully the value of care provided to patients. In this review we introduce a framework by which clinical outcome assessments (COAs) can be organized. Our COA framework is composed of five outcome measurements that encompass the perspectives of each player in a patient’s care: clinical data-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, clinician-reported outcomes, observer-reported outcomes, and reviewer-reported outcomes. By establishing a standard for evaluating patient care, we hope to address gaps in expectations of patient care and encourage more thoughtful patient-clinician relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 632-637"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcome measures in vision and eye care\",\"authors\":\"Luke Leidy ,&nbsp;Anna Dickinson ,&nbsp;Pradeep Ramulu ,&nbsp;Joshua Ehrlich ,&nbsp;Mona A. Kaleem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Traditionally, clinical outcome assessments have focused on the patient’s perspective through patient-reported outcome assessments; however, given the complexity, integration, and interactions of various participants within the clinical ophthalmology setting, we propose that additional diverse clinical perspectives should be explored in order to appreciate fully the value of care provided to patients. In this review we introduce a framework by which clinical outcome assessments (COAs) can be organized. Our COA framework is composed of five outcome measurements that encompass the perspectives of each player in a patient’s care: clinical data-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, clinician-reported outcomes, observer-reported outcomes, and reviewer-reported outcomes. By establishing a standard for evaluating patient care, we hope to address gaps in expectations of patient care and encourage more thoughtful patient-clinician relationships.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 632-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625724000225\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625724000225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,临床结果评估主要通过患者报告的结果评估来关注患者的观点;然而,鉴于眼科临床环境的复杂性、整合性以及不同参与者之间的相互作用,我们建议应探索更多不同的临床观点,以充分了解为患者提供的护理的价值。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了一个可以组织临床结果评估(COA)的框架。我们的 COA 框架由五种结果测量组成,涵盖了患者护理过程中每个参与者的观点:临床数据报告结果、患者报告结果、临床医生报告结果、观察者报告结果和评审者报告结果。我们希望通过建立评估患者护理的标准,消除人们对患者护理期望的差距,并鼓励建立更周到的患者-临床医生关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcome measures in vision and eye care

Traditionally, clinical outcome assessments have focused on the patient’s perspective through patient-reported outcome assessments; however, given the complexity, integration, and interactions of various participants within the clinical ophthalmology setting, we propose that additional diverse clinical perspectives should be explored in order to appreciate fully the value of care provided to patients. In this review we introduce a framework by which clinical outcome assessments (COAs) can be organized. Our COA framework is composed of five outcome measurements that encompass the perspectives of each player in a patient’s care: clinical data-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, clinician-reported outcomes, observer-reported outcomes, and reviewer-reported outcomes. By establishing a standard for evaluating patient care, we hope to address gaps in expectations of patient care and encourage more thoughtful patient-clinician relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信