社交媒体上有关怀孕和 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:系统回顾。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1159/000538346
Mahnoor Malik, Natasha Bauer-Maison, Giuliana Guarna, Rohan D D'Souza
{"title":"社交媒体上有关怀孕和 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:系统回顾。","authors":"Mahnoor Malik, Natasha Bauer-Maison, Giuliana Guarna, Rohan D D'Souza","doi":"10.1159/000538346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to identify common social media misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, explain the spread of misinformation, and identify solutions to guide clinical practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review was conducted and the databases Embase and Medline were searched from December 2019 to February 8, 2023, using terms related to social media, pregnancy, COVID-19 vaccines and misinformation. The inclusion criteria were original research studies that discussed misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy on social media. The exclusion criteria were review articles, no full text, and not published in English. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, extraction, and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 76 articles, of which 3 fulfilled eligibility criteria. Included studies were of moderate and high quality. The social media platforms investigated included Facebook, Google Searches, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok, and Twitter. Misinformation was related to concerns regarding vaccine safety, and its association with infertility. Misinformation was increased due to lack of content monitoring on social media, exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials, lack of information from reputable health sources on social media, and others. Suggested solutions were directed at pregnancy care providers (PCPs) and public health/government. Suggestions included: (i) integrating COVID-19 vaccination information into antenatal care, (ii) PCPs and public health should increase their social media presence to disseminate information, (iii) address population-specific vaccine concerns in a culturally relevant manner, and others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased availability of information from reputable health sources through multiple channels could increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the pregnant population and help combat misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"232-241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11175604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mahnoor Malik, Natasha Bauer-Maison, Giuliana Guarna, Rohan D D'Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to identify common social media misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, explain the spread of misinformation, and identify solutions to guide clinical practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic review was conducted and the databases Embase and Medline were searched from December 2019 to February 8, 2023, using terms related to social media, pregnancy, COVID-19 vaccines and misinformation. The inclusion criteria were original research studies that discussed misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy on social media. The exclusion criteria were review articles, no full text, and not published in English. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, extraction, and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 76 articles, of which 3 fulfilled eligibility criteria. Included studies were of moderate and high quality. The social media platforms investigated included Facebook, Google Searches, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok, and Twitter. Misinformation was related to concerns regarding vaccine safety, and its association with infertility. Misinformation was increased due to lack of content monitoring on social media, exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials, lack of information from reputable health sources on social media, and others. Suggested solutions were directed at pregnancy care providers (PCPs) and public health/government. Suggestions included: (i) integrating COVID-19 vaccination information into antenatal care, (ii) PCPs and public health should increase their social media presence to disseminate information, (iii) address population-specific vaccine concerns in a culturally relevant manner, and others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased availability of information from reputable health sources through multiple channels could increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the pregnant population and help combat misinformation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"232-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11175604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的找出社交媒体上关于孕期接种COVID-19疫苗的常见误解,解释错误信息的传播,并找出解决方案以指导临床实践和政策:从 2019 年 12 月至 2023 年 2 月 8 日,使用社交媒体、妊娠、COVID-19 疫苗和错误信息相关术语对 Embase 和 Medline 数据库进行了系统性检索。纳入标准为:原创性研究,讨论社交媒体上有关孕期接种 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息。排除标准为:综述文章、无全文、非英文发表。两位独立审稿人进行了筛选、提取和质量评估:我们的搜索发现了 76 篇文章,其中 3 篇符合资格标准。纳入的研究质量为中等和高等。调查的社交媒体平台包括 Facebook、谷歌搜索、Instagram、Reddit、Tik Tok 和 Twitter。错误信息与对疫苗安全性的担忧及其与不孕症的关联有关。社交媒体上缺乏内容监控、早期疫苗试验排斥孕妇、社交媒体上缺乏有信誉的健康信息来源等原因导致误导信息增加。建议的解决方案针对孕期保健提供者 (PCP) 和公共卫生/政府。建议包括将 COVID-19 疫苗接种信息纳入产前护理,初级保健提供者和公共卫生机构应增加其在社交媒体上的影响力以传播信息,以文化相关的方式解决特定人群对疫苗的担忧等:结论:通过多种渠道增加有信誉的卫生机构提供的信息可提高孕妇对 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率,并有助于消除误导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to identify common social media misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, explain the spread of misinformation, and identify solutions to guide clinical practice and policy.

Methodology: A systematic review was conducted and the databases Embase and Medline were searched from December 2019 to February 8, 2023, using terms related to social media, pregnancy, COVID-19 vaccines and misinformation. The inclusion criteria were original research studies that discussed misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy on social media. The exclusion criteria were review articles, no full text, and not published in English. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, extraction, and quality assessment.

Results: Our search identified 76 articles, of which 3 fulfilled eligibility criteria. Included studies were of moderate and high quality. The social media platforms investigated included Facebook, Google Searches, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok, and Twitter. Misinformation was related to concerns regarding vaccine safety, and its association with infertility. Misinformation was increased due to lack of content monitoring on social media, exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials, lack of information from reputable health sources on social media, and others. Suggested solutions were directed at pregnancy care providers (PCPs) and public health/government. Suggestions included: (i) integrating COVID-19 vaccination information into antenatal care, (ii) PCPs and public health should increase their social media presence to disseminate information, (iii) address population-specific vaccine concerns in a culturally relevant manner, and others.

Conclusion: Increased availability of information from reputable health sources through multiple channels could increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the pregnant population and help combat misinformation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信