轻度烧伤植皮前是否有必要进行术前伤口培养?一项在资源匮乏的烧伤服务机构开展的试点研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sebastian Holm, Michelle T D Smith, Fredrik Huss, Nikki Allorto
{"title":"轻度烧伤植皮前是否有必要进行术前伤口培养?一项在资源匮乏的烧伤服务机构开展的试点研究。","authors":"Sebastian Holm, Michelle T D Smith, Fredrik Huss, Nikki Allorto","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most common cited cause of split-thickness skin graft failure is infection and due to the association between bacterial findings in wound beds an attempt to decrease the bacterial burden before skin-grafting evolved. Thus, preoperative microbiology swabs of the wound bed became routine at some institutions prior to grafting. This is not standard practice in the Pietermaritzburg Burn Service. Emphasis is instead placed on a strict protocol of intraoperative wound bed preparation to promote adequate graft take. This pilot study aims to evaluate whether preoperative wound swabs are appropriate. We performed a prospective observational study to determine if positive wound cultures were associated with graft failure. All patients with a burn surface area of less than 10%, where delayed grafting (later than 28 days from the time of burn injury) was performed, from March to December 2021 were analyzed. Patient demographics, days from burn to graft, %TBSA burn, %TBSA grafted, whether sharp debridement prior to grafting in the same procedure was performed or not, use of topical gentamicin intraoperatively, graft outcome (% graft loss), need for regraft, and organism grown were recorded into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. The sample included 52 patients. Of these, 17 (31.5%) were female. The median %TBSA grafted was 8% (IQR 4%-13%) and similar in both groups. The median days from burn to grafting were 35 days. Thirty-nine patients (75%) had graft Take and 13 (25%) had graft Failure. In the failed group, the median % graft failure was 50% (30%-70%). Of the group with successful graft take, 90% were noted to have had a positive wound culture prior to grafting. A positive wound culture was not found to be a risk factor for graft failure (P = .993). Despite the positive wound cultures graft take was more than 90% in 75% of grafts performed and only 2/52 patients required supplementary grafting. We believe that this demonstrates that our local protocol is reasonable in this setting and that waiting for negative wound swabs prior to grafting should not be a reason to delay grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1281-1286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Preoperative Wound Culture Necessary Before Skin Grafting Minor Burns? A Pilot Study in a Low Resource Setting Burn Service.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Holm, Michelle T D Smith, Fredrik Huss, Nikki Allorto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The most common cited cause of split-thickness skin graft failure is infection and due to the association between bacterial findings in wound beds an attempt to decrease the bacterial burden before skin-grafting evolved. Thus, preoperative microbiology swabs of the wound bed became routine at some institutions prior to grafting. This is not standard practice in the Pietermaritzburg Burn Service. Emphasis is instead placed on a strict protocol of intraoperative wound bed preparation to promote adequate graft take. This pilot study aims to evaluate whether preoperative wound swabs are appropriate. We performed a prospective observational study to determine if positive wound cultures were associated with graft failure. All patients with a burn surface area of less than 10%, where delayed grafting (later than 28 days from the time of burn injury) was performed, from March to December 2021 were analyzed. Patient demographics, days from burn to graft, %TBSA burn, %TBSA grafted, whether sharp debridement prior to grafting in the same procedure was performed or not, use of topical gentamicin intraoperatively, graft outcome (% graft loss), need for regraft, and organism grown were recorded into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. The sample included 52 patients. Of these, 17 (31.5%) were female. The median %TBSA grafted was 8% (IQR 4%-13%) and similar in both groups. The median days from burn to grafting were 35 days. Thirty-nine patients (75%) had graft Take and 13 (25%) had graft Failure. In the failed group, the median % graft failure was 50% (30%-70%). Of the group with successful graft take, 90% were noted to have had a positive wound culture prior to grafting. A positive wound culture was not found to be a risk factor for graft failure (P = .993). Despite the positive wound cultures graft take was more than 90% in 75% of grafts performed and only 2/52 patients required supplementary grafting. We believe that this demonstrates that our local protocol is reasonable in this setting and that waiting for negative wound swabs prior to grafting should not be a reason to delay grafting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1281-1286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分层厚皮移植失败最常见的原因是感染,由于伤口床的细菌发现之间存在关联,人们开始尝试在植皮前减少细菌负担。因此,一些医疗机构在植皮前对伤口床进行微生物拭子检查已成为常规做法。在皮特马里茨堡烧伤科,这并不是标准做法。相反,皮特马里茨堡烧伤科强调严格的术中伤口床准备方案,以促进充分的移植。本试验研究旨在评估术前伤口拭子是否合适。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,以确定伤口培养阳性是否与移植物失败有关。研究分析了 2021 年 3 月至 12 月期间所有烧伤面积小于 10%、延迟移植(自烧伤起 28 天后)的患者。患者的人口统计学特征、从烧伤到植皮的天数、烧伤面积百分比(%TBSA)、植皮面积百分比(%TBSA)、在同一手术中植皮前是否进行了锐性清创、术中是否使用了局部庆大霉素、植皮结果(植皮损失百分比)、是否需要再次植皮以及生长的病原体等信息都被记录到 Excel 电子表格中进行分析。样本包括 52 名患者。其中 17 例(31.5%)为女性。两组患者移植的 TBSA 百分比中位数均为 8%(IQR 4-13%)。从烧伤到移植的中位天数为 35 天。39 名患者(75%)植皮成功,13 名患者(25%)植皮失败。在移植失败组中,中位移植失败率为 50%(30 - 70%)。在移植成功的患者中,90% 的患者在移植前伤口培养呈阳性。伤口培养阳性并不是导致移植失败的风险因素(P=0.993)。尽管伤口培养呈阳性,但在 75% 的移植物中,移植物成活率超过 90%,只有 2/52 的患者需要补充移植物。我们认为,这表明我们的本地方案在这种情况下是合理的,在移植前等待伤口拭子阴性不应成为延迟移植的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Preoperative Wound Culture Necessary Before Skin Grafting Minor Burns? A Pilot Study in a Low Resource Setting Burn Service.

The most common cited cause of split-thickness skin graft failure is infection and due to the association between bacterial findings in wound beds an attempt to decrease the bacterial burden before skin-grafting evolved. Thus, preoperative microbiology swabs of the wound bed became routine at some institutions prior to grafting. This is not standard practice in the Pietermaritzburg Burn Service. Emphasis is instead placed on a strict protocol of intraoperative wound bed preparation to promote adequate graft take. This pilot study aims to evaluate whether preoperative wound swabs are appropriate. We performed a prospective observational study to determine if positive wound cultures were associated with graft failure. All patients with a burn surface area of less than 10%, where delayed grafting (later than 28 days from the time of burn injury) was performed, from March to December 2021 were analyzed. Patient demographics, days from burn to graft, %TBSA burn, %TBSA grafted, whether sharp debridement prior to grafting in the same procedure was performed or not, use of topical gentamicin intraoperatively, graft outcome (% graft loss), need for regraft, and organism grown were recorded into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. The sample included 52 patients. Of these, 17 (31.5%) were female. The median %TBSA grafted was 8% (IQR 4%-13%) and similar in both groups. The median days from burn to grafting were 35 days. Thirty-nine patients (75%) had graft Take and 13 (25%) had graft Failure. In the failed group, the median % graft failure was 50% (30%-70%). Of the group with successful graft take, 90% were noted to have had a positive wound culture prior to grafting. A positive wound culture was not found to be a risk factor for graft failure (P = .993). Despite the positive wound cultures graft take was more than 90% in 75% of grafts performed and only 2/52 patients required supplementary grafting. We believe that this demonstrates that our local protocol is reasonable in this setting and that waiting for negative wound swabs prior to grafting should not be a reason to delay grafting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信