实现具有成本效益的雨水渗透沟设计:成本效益分析与随机分析方法相结合的混合模型

IF 3.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jun Wang, Yijiao Diao, Shengle Cao, Jiachang Wang, Jingjing Jia and Yiping Guo
{"title":"实现具有成本效益的雨水渗透沟设计:成本效益分析与随机分析方法相结合的混合模型","authors":"Jun Wang, Yijiao Diao, Shengle Cao, Jiachang Wang, Jingjing Jia and Yiping Guo","doi":"10.1039/D3EW00963G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Infiltration-based low-impact development practices are effective in sustainable urban stormwater management. The current design criteria (or design rainfall depth) for infiltration trenches in China rely on the requirements of the total annual runoff control rate. However, without considering the cost benefits, such a design criterion may overestimate the facility size and not be cost-effective. By integrating an analytical stochastic model for quantifying the runoff capture efficiency of infiltration trenches with two types of life-cycle cost approaches, this study proposed an analytical tool to determine more appropriate design criteria. An example case study of infiltration trenches implemented in Beijing, China, was performed to evaluate stormwater control performance and costs. The results indicate that the current design rainfall depth at the 75th to 85th percentiles obtained using rainfall event data following the method recommended by the design guideline may be overestimated and not cost-effective. The more economically effective design standard is recommended to range between 26.2 and 40 mm under different design conditions at the 75th to 85th percentiles, with a contributing catchment area of less than 4500 m<small><sup>2</sup></small> and soil infiltration rate between 5 and 25 mm h<small><sup>−1</sup></small>. Substantial economic savings can be achieved with lower but proper design criteria, and the proposed analytical approach is thus recommended for policy makers for the cost-effective design of infiltration trenches.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 5","pages":" 1108-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the cost-effective design of stormwater infiltration trenches: a hybrid model integrating cost–benefit analysis and an analytical stochastic approach†\",\"authors\":\"Jun Wang, Yijiao Diao, Shengle Cao, Jiachang Wang, Jingjing Jia and Yiping Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3EW00963G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Infiltration-based low-impact development practices are effective in sustainable urban stormwater management. The current design criteria (or design rainfall depth) for infiltration trenches in China rely on the requirements of the total annual runoff control rate. However, without considering the cost benefits, such a design criterion may overestimate the facility size and not be cost-effective. By integrating an analytical stochastic model for quantifying the runoff capture efficiency of infiltration trenches with two types of life-cycle cost approaches, this study proposed an analytical tool to determine more appropriate design criteria. An example case study of infiltration trenches implemented in Beijing, China, was performed to evaluate stormwater control performance and costs. The results indicate that the current design rainfall depth at the 75th to 85th percentiles obtained using rainfall event data following the method recommended by the design guideline may be overestimated and not cost-effective. The more economically effective design standard is recommended to range between 26.2 and 40 mm under different design conditions at the 75th to 85th percentiles, with a contributing catchment area of less than 4500 m<small><sup>2</sup></small> and soil infiltration rate between 5 and 25 mm h<small><sup>−1</sup></small>. Substantial economic savings can be achieved with lower but proper design criteria, and the proposed analytical approach is thus recommended for policy makers for the cost-effective design of infiltration trenches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\" 1108-1121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d3ew00963g\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d3ew00963g","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以渗透为基础的低影响开发实践是可持续城市雨水管理的有效方法。中国目前对渗透沟的设计标准(或设计降雨深度)依赖于对年径流总量控制率的要求。然而,在不考虑成本效益的情况下,这种设计标准可能会高估设施的规模,导致成本效益不高。通过将用于量化渗透沟径流捕获效率的随机分析模型与两种生命周期成本方法相结合,本研究提出了一种分析工具,以确定更合适的设计标准。通过对中国北京实施的渗透沟实例研究,对雨水控制性能和成本进行了评估。结果表明,目前按照设计指南推荐的方法,利用降雨事件数据获得的第 75 至 85 百分位数的设计降雨深度可能被高估,且成本效益不高。建议在第 75 至 85 百分位数的不同设计条件下,更经济有效的设计标准为 26.2 至 40 毫米,汇水面积小于 4500 平方米,土壤渗透率为 5 至 25 毫米/小时。采用较低但适当的设计标准可实现显著的经济节约,因此建议决策者采用所提出的分析方法,对渗沟进行经济高效的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards the cost-effective design of stormwater infiltration trenches: a hybrid model integrating cost–benefit analysis and an analytical stochastic approach†

Towards the cost-effective design of stormwater infiltration trenches: a hybrid model integrating cost–benefit analysis and an analytical stochastic approach†

Infiltration-based low-impact development practices are effective in sustainable urban stormwater management. The current design criteria (or design rainfall depth) for infiltration trenches in China rely on the requirements of the total annual runoff control rate. However, without considering the cost benefits, such a design criterion may overestimate the facility size and not be cost-effective. By integrating an analytical stochastic model for quantifying the runoff capture efficiency of infiltration trenches with two types of life-cycle cost approaches, this study proposed an analytical tool to determine more appropriate design criteria. An example case study of infiltration trenches implemented in Beijing, China, was performed to evaluate stormwater control performance and costs. The results indicate that the current design rainfall depth at the 75th to 85th percentiles obtained using rainfall event data following the method recommended by the design guideline may be overestimated and not cost-effective. The more economically effective design standard is recommended to range between 26.2 and 40 mm under different design conditions at the 75th to 85th percentiles, with a contributing catchment area of less than 4500 m2 and soil infiltration rate between 5 and 25 mm h−1. Substantial economic savings can be achieved with lower but proper design criteria, and the proposed analytical approach is thus recommended for policy makers for the cost-effective design of infiltration trenches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信