Kelli N. Patterson, Tran Bourgeois, LeeAnn Wurster, Sarah N. VerLee, Lindsay A. Gil, Kyle Z. Horvath, Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, Rajan K. Thakkar, Dana Schwartz
{"title":"对小儿被狗咬伤进行社会心理干预的普遍性:狗叫是否比咬伤更可怕?","authors":"Kelli N. Patterson, Tran Bourgeois, LeeAnn Wurster, Sarah N. VerLee, Lindsay A. Gil, Kyle Z. Horvath, Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, Rajan K. Thakkar, Dana Schwartz","doi":"10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States (<i>n</i> = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey (<i>n</i> = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients’ dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution’s practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child’s pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?\",\"authors\":\"Kelli N. Patterson, Tran Bourgeois, LeeAnn Wurster, Sarah N. VerLee, Lindsay A. Gil, Kyle Z. Horvath, Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, Rajan K. Thakkar, Dana Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States (<i>n</i> = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey (<i>n</i> = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients’ dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution’s practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child’s pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?
Purpose
Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.
Methods
A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States (n = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.
Results
In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey (n = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients’ dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.
Conclusion
Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution’s practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child’s pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.
期刊介绍:
Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives.
Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma:
The effects of childhood maltreatment
Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict
Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence
Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination
Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments
The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality
Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery
The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.