巴西外来入侵物种影响数据集

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Ana Clara Sampaio Franco, Rosana Moreira da Rocha, Vania R. Pivello, André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães, Camila Fediuk de Castro, Claudiano C. da Cruz Neto, Dalva M. da Silva Matos, George Gardner Brown, Gustavo Heringer, Hugo Henrique Lanzi Saulino, Igor Oliveira, Raul Rennó Braga, Ricardo Jessouroun Miranda, Roger Paulo Mormul, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
{"title":"巴西外来入侵物种影响数据集","authors":"Ana Clara Sampaio Franco,&nbsp;Rosana Moreira da Rocha,&nbsp;Vania R. Pivello,&nbsp;André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães,&nbsp;Camila Fediuk de Castro,&nbsp;Claudiano C. da Cruz Neto,&nbsp;Dalva M. da Silva Matos,&nbsp;George Gardner Brown,&nbsp;Gustavo Heringer,&nbsp;Hugo Henrique Lanzi Saulino,&nbsp;Igor Oliveira,&nbsp;Raul Rennó Braga,&nbsp;Ricardo Jessouroun Miranda,&nbsp;Roger Paulo Mormul,&nbsp;Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This dataset summarizes the research on the impacts of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) documented in Brazil from 1981 to 2022 and was used to subsidize the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Impacts of non-native plants and animals, but not microorganisms and fungi, on terrestrial and aquatic (freshwater and marine) environments were included in this review. Most of the literature reviewed consisted of published articles, plus a few book chapters, dissertations, theses, and reports. We found 1003 records of ecological and economic impacts (970 negative and 33 positive) caused by 239 different species, as well as effects on people's well-being. Understanding and assessing all ecological interactions of IAS in nature, as well as evaluating their contributions to humans, can be a complex task. However, the current scientific evidence from Brazil suggests that negative impacts of IAS are far more common than positive impacts, highlighting the importance of avoiding novel introductions. From a conservationist perspective, the simple presence of IAS may cause the negative impact of changing the original structure and processes of nature. This is of special concern in megadiverse countries like Brazil, where interactions among species are multiple and complex. Therefore, we believe this extensive review is an important contribution to the national knowledge of IAS and the improvement of global databases, which must be periodically reviewed. The complete dataset for this abstract published in the Data Article section of the journal is available in electronic format in MetaCat in JaLTER at http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2024-01.1/jalter-en.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"39 3","pages":"380-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dataset of the impacts of invasive alien species in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Ana Clara Sampaio Franco,&nbsp;Rosana Moreira da Rocha,&nbsp;Vania R. Pivello,&nbsp;André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães,&nbsp;Camila Fediuk de Castro,&nbsp;Claudiano C. da Cruz Neto,&nbsp;Dalva M. da Silva Matos,&nbsp;George Gardner Brown,&nbsp;Gustavo Heringer,&nbsp;Hugo Henrique Lanzi Saulino,&nbsp;Igor Oliveira,&nbsp;Raul Rennó Braga,&nbsp;Ricardo Jessouroun Miranda,&nbsp;Roger Paulo Mormul,&nbsp;Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1703.12452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This dataset summarizes the research on the impacts of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) documented in Brazil from 1981 to 2022 and was used to subsidize the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Impacts of non-native plants and animals, but not microorganisms and fungi, on terrestrial and aquatic (freshwater and marine) environments were included in this review. Most of the literature reviewed consisted of published articles, plus a few book chapters, dissertations, theses, and reports. We found 1003 records of ecological and economic impacts (970 negative and 33 positive) caused by 239 different species, as well as effects on people's well-being. Understanding and assessing all ecological interactions of IAS in nature, as well as evaluating their contributions to humans, can be a complex task. However, the current scientific evidence from Brazil suggests that negative impacts of IAS are far more common than positive impacts, highlighting the importance of avoiding novel introductions. From a conservationist perspective, the simple presence of IAS may cause the negative impact of changing the original structure and processes of nature. This is of special concern in megadiverse countries like Brazil, where interactions among species are multiple and complex. Therefore, we believe this extensive review is an important contribution to the national knowledge of IAS and the improvement of global databases, which must be periodically reviewed. The complete dataset for this abstract published in the Data Article section of the journal is available in electronic format in MetaCat in JaLTER at http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2024-01.1/jalter-en.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Research\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"380-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12452\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该数据集总结了 1981 年至 2022 年期间巴西记录的外来入侵物种 (IAS) 影响研究,用于补贴巴西生物多样性和生态系统服务平台。非外来动植物(但不包括微生物和真菌)对陆地和水生(淡水和海洋)环境的影响包括在本综述中。所查阅的大部分文献都是已发表的文章,另外还有一些书籍章节、论文、论著和报告。我们发现有 1003 条记录涉及 239 种不同物种造成的生态和经济影响(970 条负面影响和 33 条正面影响),以及对人类福祉的影响。了解和评估 IAS 在自然界中的所有生态相互作用以及它们对人类的贡献是一项复杂的任务。然而,巴西目前的科学证据表明,IAS 带来的负面影响远比正面影响更为常见,这凸显了避免新物种引入的重要性。从保护主义者的角度来看,IAS 的简单存在可能会造成改变自然界原有结构和过程的负面影响。这一点在巴西这样的生物多样性大国尤其值得关注,因为在这些国家,物种之间的相互作用是多重而复杂的。因此,我们认为这篇广泛的综述是对各国了解 IAS 和改进全球数据库的重要贡献,必须定期对全球数据库进行审查。该期刊数据文章部分发表的这篇摘要的完整数据集的电子版可在 JaLTER 的 MetaCat 中查阅,网址为 http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2024-01.1/jalter-en。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dataset of the impacts of invasive alien species in Brazil

Dataset of the impacts of invasive alien species in Brazil

Dataset of the impacts of invasive alien species in Brazil

This dataset summarizes the research on the impacts of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) documented in Brazil from 1981 to 2022 and was used to subsidize the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Impacts of non-native plants and animals, but not microorganisms and fungi, on terrestrial and aquatic (freshwater and marine) environments were included in this review. Most of the literature reviewed consisted of published articles, plus a few book chapters, dissertations, theses, and reports. We found 1003 records of ecological and economic impacts (970 negative and 33 positive) caused by 239 different species, as well as effects on people's well-being. Understanding and assessing all ecological interactions of IAS in nature, as well as evaluating their contributions to humans, can be a complex task. However, the current scientific evidence from Brazil suggests that negative impacts of IAS are far more common than positive impacts, highlighting the importance of avoiding novel introductions. From a conservationist perspective, the simple presence of IAS may cause the negative impact of changing the original structure and processes of nature. This is of special concern in megadiverse countries like Brazil, where interactions among species are multiple and complex. Therefore, we believe this extensive review is an important contribution to the national knowledge of IAS and the improvement of global databases, which must be periodically reviewed. The complete dataset for this abstract published in the Data Article section of the journal is available in electronic format in MetaCat in JaLTER at http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2024-01.1/jalter-en.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信