知识社会中基于地域的身份认同和裂痕的形成

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Delia Zollinger
{"title":"知识社会中基于地域的身份认同和裂痕的形成","authors":"Delia Zollinger","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electoral divides mobilized by the far right and the new left typically have an important spatial component. An urban-rural cleavage (originally theorized by Lipset and Rokkan) seems to have re-surfaced. This paper argues that a cleavage perspective on spatial political divides remains insightful but that the urban-rural cleavage needs to be re-conceptualized for the knowledge society era. Building on cleavage theory and using novel Swiss survey data, the study shows that spatial divides today can be understood as conflicts that are largely sectoral and educational at their core (rooted in the knowledge-based economy). However, these divides may become politically mobilized and perceived through a lens of place. Categories like ‘urban/rural’ can structure people's mental maps of society, even when they inaccurately capture political conflicts' structural and geographical underpinnings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026137942400026X/pdfft?md5=fe07008c2859bd52774ae118ca232da0&pid=1-s2.0-S026137942400026X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Place-based identities and cleavage formation in the knowledge society\",\"authors\":\"Delia Zollinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Electoral divides mobilized by the far right and the new left typically have an important spatial component. An urban-rural cleavage (originally theorized by Lipset and Rokkan) seems to have re-surfaced. This paper argues that a cleavage perspective on spatial political divides remains insightful but that the urban-rural cleavage needs to be re-conceptualized for the knowledge society era. Building on cleavage theory and using novel Swiss survey data, the study shows that spatial divides today can be understood as conflicts that are largely sectoral and educational at their core (rooted in the knowledge-based economy). However, these divides may become politically mobilized and perceived through a lens of place. Categories like ‘urban/rural’ can structure people's mental maps of society, even when they inaccurately capture political conflicts' structural and geographical underpinnings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electoral Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026137942400026X/pdfft?md5=fe07008c2859bd52774ae118ca232da0&pid=1-s2.0-S026137942400026X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electoral Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026137942400026X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026137942400026X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

极右翼和新左派动员起来的选举分裂通常具有重要的空间因素。城乡裂痕(最初由 Lipset 和 Rokkan 提出)似乎已经重新浮出水面。本文认为,关于空间政治分歧的裂痕视角仍然具有洞察力,但需要针对知识社会时代重新构思城乡裂痕。研究以裂痕理论为基础,利用瑞士的新型调查数据,表明当今的空间分隔可以理解为主要以部门和教育为核心(植根于知识经济)的冲突。然而,这些鸿沟可能在政治上被动员起来,并通过地方的视角被感知。城市/农村 "等分类可以构建人们的社会心理地图,即使这些分类并不能准确捕捉政治冲突的结构和地理基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Place-based identities and cleavage formation in the knowledge society

Electoral divides mobilized by the far right and the new left typically have an important spatial component. An urban-rural cleavage (originally theorized by Lipset and Rokkan) seems to have re-surfaced. This paper argues that a cleavage perspective on spatial political divides remains insightful but that the urban-rural cleavage needs to be re-conceptualized for the knowledge society era. Building on cleavage theory and using novel Swiss survey data, the study shows that spatial divides today can be understood as conflicts that are largely sectoral and educational at their core (rooted in the knowledge-based economy). However, these divides may become politically mobilized and perceived through a lens of place. Categories like ‘urban/rural’ can structure people's mental maps of society, even when they inaccurately capture political conflicts' structural and geographical underpinnings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electoral Studies
Electoral Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Electoral Studies is an international journal covering all aspects of voting, the central act in the democratic process. Political scientists, economists, sociologists, game theorists, geographers, contemporary historians and lawyers have common, and overlapping, interests in what causes voters to act as they do, and the consequences. Electoral Studies provides a forum for these diverse approaches. It publishes fully refereed papers, both theoretical and empirical, on such topics as relationships between votes and seats, and between election outcomes and politicians reactions; historical, sociological, or geographical correlates of voting behaviour; rational choice analysis of political acts, and critiques of such analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信