{"title":"阴离子间隙在筛查高阴离子间隙代谢性酸中毒中的诊断阈值和性能。","authors":"Chang Yin Chionh, Carolyn Shan-Yeu Tien, Wenxiang Yeon","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The anion gap (AG) is commonly used to screen for acid-base disorders. It was proposed that the cut-off for high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) may be lower with current laboratory techniques, although modern laboratory equipment are still calibrated to familiar reference ranges established with earlier techniques. The appropriate cut-off for HAGMA is unclear. This study aimed to assess the performance of AG as a screening test for HAGMA and to determine the optimal diagnostic threshold of AG for HAGMA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a large, anonymised dataset extracted by computerised protocol from 2017 to 2019. All inpatients with blood samples taken for organic acids (lactate, ketone or salicylate) paired with a metabolic panel were included. The target condition was HAGMA secondary to elevated blood lactate, ketone and/or salicylate. Sensitivity for HAGMA was explored at various AG cut-off levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16,475 patients, 2,621 had organic acidosis. Median age was 65 years, and median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m2. With organic acidosis, the median AG was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] 20-29) mEq/L, while without organic acidosis, the median AG was 16 (IQR 14-19) mEq/L. The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of AG for HAGMA was 0.873. Desired sensitivity for HAGMA was set at ≥95%, and this was found with an AG threshold of ≥15 mEq/L (sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 34.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recommended AG threshold value is ≥15 mEq/L with a high sensitivity for HAGMA. The AG should always be interpreted with the clinical context, and it should be repeated as the clinical picture evolves.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic threshold and performance of anion gap in screening for high anion gap metabolic acidosis.\",\"authors\":\"Chang Yin Chionh, Carolyn Shan-Yeu Tien, Wenxiang Yeon\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The anion gap (AG) is commonly used to screen for acid-base disorders. It was proposed that the cut-off for high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) may be lower with current laboratory techniques, although modern laboratory equipment are still calibrated to familiar reference ranges established with earlier techniques. The appropriate cut-off for HAGMA is unclear. This study aimed to assess the performance of AG as a screening test for HAGMA and to determine the optimal diagnostic threshold of AG for HAGMA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a large, anonymised dataset extracted by computerised protocol from 2017 to 2019. All inpatients with blood samples taken for organic acids (lactate, ketone or salicylate) paired with a metabolic panel were included. The target condition was HAGMA secondary to elevated blood lactate, ketone and/or salicylate. Sensitivity for HAGMA was explored at various AG cut-off levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 16,475 patients, 2,621 had organic acidosis. Median age was 65 years, and median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m2. With organic acidosis, the median AG was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] 20-29) mEq/L, while without organic acidosis, the median AG was 16 (IQR 14-19) mEq/L. The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of AG for HAGMA was 0.873. Desired sensitivity for HAGMA was set at ≥95%, and this was found with an AG threshold of ≥15 mEq/L (sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 34.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recommended AG threshold value is ≥15 mEq/L with a high sensitivity for HAGMA. The AG should always be interpreted with the clinical context, and it should be repeated as the clinical picture evolves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介阴离子间隙(AG)通常用于筛查酸碱紊乱。尽管现代实验室设备仍根据早期技术建立的熟悉的参考范围进行校准,但有人提出,高阴离子间隙代谢性酸中毒(HAGMA)的临界值在目前的实验室技术下可能会更低。HAGMA的合适临界值尚不明确。本研究旨在评估 AG 作为 HAGMA 筛查试验的性能,并确定 AG 对 HAGMA 的最佳诊断阈值:这是对2017年至2019年期间通过计算机协议提取的大型匿名数据集进行的回顾性分析。纳入了所有抽取血液样本检测有机酸(乳酸、酮或水杨酸)并配以代谢面板的住院患者。目标条件是继发于血液乳酸、酮和/或水杨酸升高的 HAGMA。结果显示,在 16,475 名患者中,2,3,4,5 名患者的血液中乳酸和/或水杨酸含量升高:在 16,475 名患者中,2,621 人患有器质性酸中毒。中位年龄为 65 岁,估计肾小球滤过率中位数为 70 mL/min/1.73 m2。有机性酸中毒患者的AG中位数为23(四分位距[IQR] 20-29)毫微克/升,而无有机性酸中毒患者的AG中位数为16(四分位距[IQR] 14-19)毫微克/升。HAGMA 的 AG 曲线下面积-接收器操作特征为 0.873。HAGMA 的预期灵敏度设定为≥95%,AG 阈值≥15 mEq/L(灵敏度 98.1%,特异性 34.0%):推荐的 AG 临界值为≥15 mEq/L,对 HAGMA 具有较高的灵敏度。在解释 AG 时应始终结合临床情况,并随着临床情况的变化而重复进行。
Diagnostic threshold and performance of anion gap in screening for high anion gap metabolic acidosis.
Introduction: The anion gap (AG) is commonly used to screen for acid-base disorders. It was proposed that the cut-off for high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) may be lower with current laboratory techniques, although modern laboratory equipment are still calibrated to familiar reference ranges established with earlier techniques. The appropriate cut-off for HAGMA is unclear. This study aimed to assess the performance of AG as a screening test for HAGMA and to determine the optimal diagnostic threshold of AG for HAGMA.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a large, anonymised dataset extracted by computerised protocol from 2017 to 2019. All inpatients with blood samples taken for organic acids (lactate, ketone or salicylate) paired with a metabolic panel were included. The target condition was HAGMA secondary to elevated blood lactate, ketone and/or salicylate. Sensitivity for HAGMA was explored at various AG cut-off levels.
Results: Of 16,475 patients, 2,621 had organic acidosis. Median age was 65 years, and median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m2. With organic acidosis, the median AG was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] 20-29) mEq/L, while without organic acidosis, the median AG was 16 (IQR 14-19) mEq/L. The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of AG for HAGMA was 0.873. Desired sensitivity for HAGMA was set at ≥95%, and this was found with an AG threshold of ≥15 mEq/L (sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 34.0%).
Conclusion: The recommended AG threshold value is ≥15 mEq/L with a high sensitivity for HAGMA. The AG should always be interpreted with the clinical context, and it should be repeated as the clinical picture evolves.