姑息关怀知识量表的有效性和可靠性。

IF 1.3
Omega Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1177/00302228241239712
Aysun Yağci Şentürk, Atiye Kaş Özdemir
{"title":"姑息关怀知识量表的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Aysun Yağci Şentürk, Atiye Kaş Özdemir","doi":"10.1177/00302228241239712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tools to measure layout people's knowledge about palliative care are very limited. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) in Turkish on layout people other than healthcare professionals. Perception of Health Scale (PHS) and European Health Literacy Survey (EHLS) scales were used to ensure concurrent validity of PaCKS. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be .846. In item analysis, item-total score correlations were found to be between .343 and .691. Intraclass correlation coefficient of PaCKS total score was found to be .862, <i>p</i> < .001 in test-retest results. In the concurrent validity analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the PaCKS and the PHS (r = .504, <i>p</i> = .000) and PaCKS and the EHLS (r = .251, <i>p</i> = .017). PaCKS is a simple, applicable and short test that can be easily understood by layout people without any health education.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"532-543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Aysun Yağci Şentürk, Atiye Kaş Özdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00302228241239712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tools to measure layout people's knowledge about palliative care are very limited. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) in Turkish on layout people other than healthcare professionals. Perception of Health Scale (PHS) and European Health Literacy Survey (EHLS) scales were used to ensure concurrent validity of PaCKS. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be .846. In item analysis, item-total score correlations were found to be between .343 and .691. Intraclass correlation coefficient of PaCKS total score was found to be .862, <i>p</i> < .001 in test-retest results. In the concurrent validity analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the PaCKS and the PHS (r = .504, <i>p</i> = .000) and PaCKS and the EHLS (r = .251, <i>p</i> = .017). PaCKS is a simple, applicable and short test that can be easily understood by layout people without any health education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"532-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241239712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241239712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前用于衡量医务人员姑息关怀知识的工具非常有限。本研究旨在对土耳其语姑息关怀知识量表(PaCKS)的有效性和可靠性进行研究,研究对象为非医护人员的布局人群。研究使用了健康感知量表(PHS)和欧洲健康素养调查(EHLS)量表来确保PaCKS的并行有效性。量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.846。在项目分析中,发现项目与总分的相关系数介于 0.343 和 0.691 之间。在重测结果中,PaCKS 总分的类内相关系数为 0.862,p < 0.001。在同时有效性分析中,PaCKS与PHS(r = .504,p = .000)和PaCKS与EHLS(r = .251,p = .017)之间存在统计学意义上的显著正相关。PaCKS是一项简单、适用且简短的测试,没有接受过任何健康教育的普通人也能轻松理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale.

Tools to measure layout people's knowledge about palliative care are very limited. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS) in Turkish on layout people other than healthcare professionals. Perception of Health Scale (PHS) and European Health Literacy Survey (EHLS) scales were used to ensure concurrent validity of PaCKS. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was found to be .846. In item analysis, item-total score correlations were found to be between .343 and .691. Intraclass correlation coefficient of PaCKS total score was found to be .862, p < .001 in test-retest results. In the concurrent validity analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the PaCKS and the PHS (r = .504, p = .000) and PaCKS and the EHLS (r = .251, p = .017). PaCKS is a simple, applicable and short test that can be easily understood by layout people without any health education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信