Jong Hyuk Lee, Kum Ju Chae, Jimyung Park, Sun Mi Choi, Myoung-Jin Jang, Eui Jin Hwang, Gong Yong Jin, Jin Mo Goo
{"title":"间质性肺病当天 CT 定量的测量变异性:一项多中心前瞻性研究","authors":"Jong Hyuk Lee, Kum Ju Chae, Jimyung Park, Sun Mi Choi, Myoung-Jin Jang, Eui Jin Hwang, Gong Yong Jin, Jin Mo Goo","doi":"10.1148/ryct.230287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To investigate quantitative CT (QCT) measurement variability in interstitial lung disease (ILD) on the basis of two same-day CT scans. Materials and Methods Participants with ILD were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study between March and October 2022. Participants underwent two same-day CT scans at an interval of a few minutes. Deep learning-based texture analysis software was used to segment ILD features. Fibrosis extent was defined as the sum of reticular opacity and honeycombing cysts. Measurement variability between scans was assessed with Bland-Altman analyses for absolute and relative differences with 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The contribution of fibrosis extent to variability was analyzed using a multivariable linear mixed-effects model while adjusting for lung volume. Eight readers assessed ILD fibrosis stability with and without QCT information for 30 randomly selected samples. Results Sixty-five participants were enrolled in this study (mean age, 68.7 years ± 10 [SD]; 47 [72%] men, 18 [28%] women). Between two same-day CT scans, the 95% LOA for the mean absolute and relative differences of quantitative fibrosis extent were -0.9% to 1.0% and -14.8% to 16.1%, respectively. However, these variabilities increased to 95% LOA of -11.3% to 3.9% and -123.1% to 18.4% between CT scans with different reconstruction parameters. Multivariable analysis showed that absolute differences were not associated with the baseline extent of fibrosis (<i>P</i> = .09), but the relative differences were negatively associated (β = -0.252, <i>P</i> < .001). The QCT results increased readers' specificity in interpreting ILD fibrosis stability (91.7% vs 94.6%, <i>P</i> = .02). Conclusion The absolute QCT measurement variability of fibrosis extent in ILD was 1% in same-day CT scans. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, CT-Quantitative, Thorax, Lung, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Diagnosis, Computer Assisted, Diagnostic Imaging <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11056748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Variability of Same-Day CT Quantification of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Hyuk Lee, Kum Ju Chae, Jimyung Park, Sun Mi Choi, Myoung-Jin Jang, Eui Jin Hwang, Gong Yong Jin, Jin Mo Goo\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryct.230287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To investigate quantitative CT (QCT) measurement variability in interstitial lung disease (ILD) on the basis of two same-day CT scans. Materials and Methods Participants with ILD were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study between March and October 2022. Participants underwent two same-day CT scans at an interval of a few minutes. Deep learning-based texture analysis software was used to segment ILD features. Fibrosis extent was defined as the sum of reticular opacity and honeycombing cysts. Measurement variability between scans was assessed with Bland-Altman analyses for absolute and relative differences with 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The contribution of fibrosis extent to variability was analyzed using a multivariable linear mixed-effects model while adjusting for lung volume. Eight readers assessed ILD fibrosis stability with and without QCT information for 30 randomly selected samples. Results Sixty-five participants were enrolled in this study (mean age, 68.7 years ± 10 [SD]; 47 [72%] men, 18 [28%] women). Between two same-day CT scans, the 95% LOA for the mean absolute and relative differences of quantitative fibrosis extent were -0.9% to 1.0% and -14.8% to 16.1%, respectively. However, these variabilities increased to 95% LOA of -11.3% to 3.9% and -123.1% to 18.4% between CT scans with different reconstruction parameters. Multivariable analysis showed that absolute differences were not associated with the baseline extent of fibrosis (<i>P</i> = .09), but the relative differences were negatively associated (β = -0.252, <i>P</i> < .001). The QCT results increased readers' specificity in interpreting ILD fibrosis stability (91.7% vs 94.6%, <i>P</i> = .02). Conclusion The absolute QCT measurement variability of fibrosis extent in ILD was 1% in same-day CT scans. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, CT-Quantitative, Thorax, Lung, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Diagnosis, Computer Assisted, Diagnostic Imaging <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. © RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11056748/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0