Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen
{"title":"使用软性隐形眼镜采集人体泪膜蛋白质样本。","authors":"Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen","doi":"10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"21 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human tear film protein sampling using soft contact lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human tear film protein sampling using soft contact lenses.
Background: Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).
Results: We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.
Conclusions: These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.