使用软性隐形眼镜采集人体泪膜蛋白质样本。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen
{"title":"使用软性隐形眼镜采集人体泪膜蛋白质样本。","authors":"Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen","doi":"10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"21 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human tear film protein sampling using soft contact lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Robert K Roden, Nathan Zuniga, Joshua C Wright, David H Parkinson, Fangfang Jiang, Leena M Patil, Rebecca S Burlett, Alyssa A Nitz, Joshua J Rogers, Jarett T Pittman, Kenneth L Virgin, P Christine Ackroyd, Samuel H Payne, John C Price, Kenneth A Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09475-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人类泪液蛋白生物标志物可用于检测眼部和全身疾病。遗憾的是,现有的泪膜取样方法(施尔默条(SS)和微毛细管(MCT))存在明显的缺点,如疼痛、损伤风险、取样困难以及不同方法之间的蛋白质组差异。在此,我们提出了一种使用软性隐形眼镜(SCL)进行泪液蛋白质采样的替代方法:结果:我们对 SCL 蛋白采样进行了体外优化,并对 6 名受试者进行了体内研究。我们使用 Etafilcon A SCL 和 4M guanidine-HCl 清除蛋白质,平均每只眼睛取样 60 ± 31 µg 蛋白质。我们还对所有取样方法进行了客观和主观评估。采样后观察到刺激迹象的是 SS,而不是 MCT 和 SCL。质谱(MS)蛋白质组分析表明,所有取样方法都能检测到丰富的泪液蛋白质。不过,特别是在 SS 和 MCT 中发现了较少的独特和共享蛋白质子集。此外,MCT 和 SCL 取样在受试者内部没有明显差异:这些实验证明,SCL 是一种易于使用的泪液取样方法,有可能在基础泪液取样方面超越现有方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human tear film protein sampling using soft contact lenses.

Background: Human tear protein biomarkers are useful for detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Unfortunately, existing tear film sampling methods (Schirmer strip; SS and microcapillary tube; MCT) have significant drawbacks, such as pain, risk of injury, sampling difficulty, and proteomic disparities between methods. Here, we present an alternative tear protein sampling method using soft contact lenses (SCLs).

Results: We optimized the SCL protein sampling in vitro and performed in vivo studies in 6 subjects. Using Etafilcon A SCLs and 4M guanidine-HCl for protein removal, we sampled an average of 60 ± 31 µg of protein per eye. We also performed objective and subjective assessments of all sampling methods. Signs of irritation post-sampling were observed with SS but not with MCT and SCLs. Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) revealed that all sampling methods resulted in the detection of abundant tear proteins. However, smaller subsets of unique and shared proteins were identified, particularly for SS and MCT. Additionally, there was no significant intrasubject variation between MCT and SCL sampling.

Conclusions: These experiments demonstrate that SCLs are an accessible tear-sampling method with the potential to surpass current methods in sampling basal tears.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信