Laís Oliveira de Moraes Tavares, Marla Ariana Silva, Bianca Rabelo de Oliveira, Gabriela Gonçalves Amaral, Eliete Albano de Azevedo Guimarães, Renê Oliveira Couto, Valéria Conceição de Oliveira
{"title":"据称可归因于疫苗接种/免疫接种的错误事件发生率：系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Laís Oliveira de Moraes Tavares, Marla Ariana Silva, Bianca Rabelo de Oliveira, Gabriela Gonçalves Amaral, Eliete Albano de Azevedo Guimarães, Renê Oliveira Couto, Valéria Conceição de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230097.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the prevalence of errors that caused events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic literature review with meta-analysis carried out on the Medline, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus; Embase; Open Grey; Google Scholar; and Grey Lit databases; with studies that presented the prevalence of immunization errors that caused events or that provided data that allowed this indicator to be calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 11 articles published between 2010 and 2021, indicating a prevalence of 0.044 errors per 10,000 doses administered (n=762; CI95%: 0.026 - 0.075; I2 = 99%, p < 0.01). The prevalence was higher in children under 5 (0.334 / 10,000 doses; n=14). The predominant events were fever, local pain, edema and redness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low prevalence of errors causing events was identified. However, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and, consequently, have an impact on vaccination coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of errors causing events allegedly attributable to vaccination/immunization: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Laís Oliveira de Moraes Tavares, Marla Ariana Silva, Bianca Rabelo de Oliveira, Gabriela Gonçalves Amaral, Eliete Albano de Azevedo Guimarães, Renê Oliveira Couto, Valéria Conceição de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230097.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the prevalence of errors that caused events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic literature review with meta-analysis carried out on the Medline, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus; Embase; Open Grey; Google Scholar; and Grey Lit databases; with studies that presented the prevalence of immunization errors that caused events or that provided data that allowed this indicator to be calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 11 articles published between 2010 and 2021, indicating a prevalence of 0.044 errors per 10,000 doses administered (n=762; CI95%: 0.026 - 0.075; I2 = 99%, p < 0.01). The prevalence was higher in children under 5 (0.334 / 10,000 doses; n=14). The predominant events were fever, local pain, edema and redness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low prevalence of errors causing events was identified. However, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and, consequently, have an impact on vaccination coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230097.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230097.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of errors causing events allegedly attributable to vaccination/immunization: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To identify the prevalence of errors that caused events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization.
Method: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis carried out on the Medline, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus; Embase; Open Grey; Google Scholar; and Grey Lit databases; with studies that presented the prevalence of immunization errors that caused events or that provided data that allowed this indicator to be calculated.
Results: We evaluated 11 articles published between 2010 and 2021, indicating a prevalence of 0.044 errors per 10,000 doses administered (n=762; CI95%: 0.026 - 0.075; I2 = 99%, p < 0.01). The prevalence was higher in children under 5 (0.334 / 10,000 doses; n=14). The predominant events were fever, local pain, edema and redness.
Conclusion: A low prevalence of errors causing events was identified. However, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and, consequently, have an impact on vaccination coverage.
期刊介绍：
A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
