评估再辐射牙齿的推出粘接强度:通用树脂粘接剂在自酸蚀和自粘模式下的性能。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gabriel Hernandez Machado de Souza DDS, Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias-Junior DDS, MSc, PhD, Renata Gondo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD, Gabriela Pasqualin Ghidini DDS, MSc, Mariana Comparotto Minamisako DDS, MSc, Marcio Toshio Umeda Takashima MD, Nayara Cardoso Cábia BMedPhys, Ricardo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira DDS, MSc, PhD, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"评估再辐射牙齿的推出粘接强度:通用树脂粘接剂在自酸蚀和自粘模式下的性能。","authors":"Gabriel Hernandez Machado de Souza DDS,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias-Junior DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Renata Gondo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gabriela Pasqualin Ghidini DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Mariana Comparotto Minamisako DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Marcio Toshio Umeda Takashima MD,&nbsp;Nayara Cardoso Cábia BMedPhys,&nbsp;Ricardo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effect of cumulative doses of radiation on the pushout bond strength (BS) of a universal resin cement used in the self-etch (SE) and self-adhesive (SA) modes to the intraradicular dentin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-eight human teeth were distributed into three groups (<i>n</i> = 16) according to the radiation therapy dose (RT): NoRT (no-radiotherapy), 70RT (70 Gy), and 70 + 70RT (70 Gy + 70 Gy). The teeth were redistributed into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 8), according to the adhesive mode: SE (NoRT-SE, 70RT-SE, and 70 + 70RT-SE) and SA (NoRT-SA, 70RT-SA, and 70 + 70RT-SA). Data were statistically compared after BS test (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and Fisher's exact test).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the SA mode, BS was significantly higher in nonirradiated teeth compared with 70RT and 70 + 70RT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). There were no significant differences between SE and SA modes in nonirradiated teeth (<i>p</i> = 0.14). In the 70RT group, SE mode increased BS compared with SA mode (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Most specimens had adhesive and mixed failures in SA and SE modes, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The universal resin cement in the SE mode had greater BS to the irradiated dentin. When teeth were re-irradiated, the universal resin cement had similar performance in terms of BS, regardless of the adhesive approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>There is no research establishing a correlation between radiotherapy and its impact on the BS of a universal resin cement used in SE and SA modes to intraradicular dentin.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing push-out bond strength in re-irradiated teeth: Universal resin cement performance in self-etch and self-adhesive modes\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Hernandez Machado de Souza DDS,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos de Lima Dias-Junior DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Renata Gondo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gabriela Pasqualin Ghidini DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Mariana Comparotto Minamisako DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Marcio Toshio Umeda Takashima MD,&nbsp;Nayara Cardoso Cábia BMedPhys,&nbsp;Ricardo Machado DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the effect of cumulative doses of radiation on the pushout bond strength (BS) of a universal resin cement used in the self-etch (SE) and self-adhesive (SA) modes to the intraradicular dentin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-eight human teeth were distributed into three groups (<i>n</i> = 16) according to the radiation therapy dose (RT): NoRT (no-radiotherapy), 70RT (70 Gy), and 70 + 70RT (70 Gy + 70 Gy). The teeth were redistributed into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 8), according to the adhesive mode: SE (NoRT-SE, 70RT-SE, and 70 + 70RT-SE) and SA (NoRT-SA, 70RT-SA, and 70 + 70RT-SA). Data were statistically compared after BS test (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and Fisher's exact test).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the SA mode, BS was significantly higher in nonirradiated teeth compared with 70RT and 70 + 70RT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). There were no significant differences between SE and SA modes in nonirradiated teeth (<i>p</i> = 0.14). In the 70RT group, SE mode increased BS compared with SA mode (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Most specimens had adhesive and mixed failures in SA and SE modes, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The universal resin cement in the SE mode had greater BS to the irradiated dentin. When teeth were re-irradiated, the universal resin cement had similar performance in terms of BS, regardless of the adhesive approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is no research establishing a correlation between radiotherapy and its impact on the BS of a universal resin cement used in SE and SA modes to intraradicular dentin.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究辐射累积剂量对自酸蚀(SE)和自粘(SA)模式下通用树脂粘结剂与牙本质的推出粘结强度(BS)的影响:根据放射治疗剂量(RT)将 48 颗人类牙齿分为三组(n = 16):NoRT(无放射治疗)、70RT(70 Gy)和 70 + 70RT(70 Gy + 70 Gy)。根据粘合模式,牙齿被重新分为两个亚组(n = 8):SE(NoRT-SE、70RT-SE 和 70 + 70RT-SE)和 SA(NoRT-SA、70RT-SA 和 70 + 70RT-SA)。对 BS 测试后的数据进行统计比较(方差分析、Tukey 后检验和费雪精确检验):结果:在 SA 模式中,与 70RT 和 70 + 70RT 相比,未经过辐照的牙齿的 BS 明显更高(p 结论:SA 模式中的通用树脂粘结剂与 70RT 和 70 + 70RT 相比,BS 明显更高:在 SE 模式下,通用树脂水泥对辐照牙本质的 BS 值更高。当牙齿再次接受辐照时,无论采用哪种粘接方式,通用树脂粘接剂的BS性能都差不多:目前还没有研究证实放射治疗与通用树脂粘接剂在SE和SA模式下对牙本质BS的影响之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing push-out bond strength in re-irradiated teeth: Universal resin cement performance in self-etch and self-adhesive modes

Objectives

To investigate the effect of cumulative doses of radiation on the pushout bond strength (BS) of a universal resin cement used in the self-etch (SE) and self-adhesive (SA) modes to the intraradicular dentin.

Materials and Methods

Forty-eight human teeth were distributed into three groups (n = 16) according to the radiation therapy dose (RT): NoRT (no-radiotherapy), 70RT (70 Gy), and 70 + 70RT (70 Gy + 70 Gy). The teeth were redistributed into two subgroups (n = 8), according to the adhesive mode: SE (NoRT-SE, 70RT-SE, and 70 + 70RT-SE) and SA (NoRT-SA, 70RT-SA, and 70 + 70RT-SA). Data were statistically compared after BS test (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and Fisher's exact test).

Results

In the SA mode, BS was significantly higher in nonirradiated teeth compared with 70RT and 70 + 70RT (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between SE and SA modes in nonirradiated teeth (p = 0.14). In the 70RT group, SE mode increased BS compared with SA mode (p < 0.0001). Most specimens had adhesive and mixed failures in SA and SE modes, respectively.

Conclusions

The universal resin cement in the SE mode had greater BS to the irradiated dentin. When teeth were re-irradiated, the universal resin cement had similar performance in terms of BS, regardless of the adhesive approach.

Clinical Significance

There is no research establishing a correlation between radiotherapy and its impact on the BS of a universal resin cement used in SE and SA modes to intraradicular dentin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信