David Teren, Gil Neuman, Adi Abulafia, Evgeny Gelman, Elishai Assayag, Abeer Hajj, Orna Shwartz, David Zadok
{"title":"反复使用 1%聚维酮碘与单次使用 5%聚维酮碘的抗菌活性和毒性的体内评估。","authors":"David Teren, Gil Neuman, Adi Abulafia, Evgeny Gelman, Elishai Assayag, Abeer Hajj, Orna Shwartz, David Zadok","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the noninferiority in antimicrobial effectiveness of thrice-repeated applications of 1% povidone-iodine (PI) compared with a single application of 5% PI on the ocular surface in vivo and to evaluate potential toxicity of PI to the corneal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients randomly received either a single application of 5% PI or repeated irrigations of 1% PI on the ocular surface preoperatively. Bacterial colony counts were quantitatively analyzed by taking standardized conjunctival swabs before and after irrigation, and differences in bacterial colony counts were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of superficial punctate keratopathy was evaluated in all patients by the National Eye Institute grading system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 102 eyes of 102 patients. Both 1% and 5% PI yielded a marked decrease in bacterial colonies compared with before application ( P < .001). The repeated application of 1% PI showed a significantly lower bacterial count compared with the single application of 5% PI ( P < .05) and resulted in significantly less damage to the corneal epithelium compared with a single 5% PI application ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative repeated applications of 1% PI effectively eradicated ocular surface bacteria equal to that of 5% PI with a less deleterious effect on the corneal epithelium. Our findings suggest that 1% PI may be a promising alternative to 5% PI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"682-687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vivo assessment of antimicrobial activity and toxicity of repeated 1% povidone-iodine applications vs a single 5% povidone-iodine application.\",\"authors\":\"David Teren, Gil Neuman, Adi Abulafia, Evgeny Gelman, Elishai Assayag, Abeer Hajj, Orna Shwartz, David Zadok\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the noninferiority in antimicrobial effectiveness of thrice-repeated applications of 1% povidone-iodine (PI) compared with a single application of 5% PI on the ocular surface in vivo and to evaluate potential toxicity of PI to the corneal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients randomly received either a single application of 5% PI or repeated irrigations of 1% PI on the ocular surface preoperatively. Bacterial colony counts were quantitatively analyzed by taking standardized conjunctival swabs before and after irrigation, and differences in bacterial colony counts were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of superficial punctate keratopathy was evaluated in all patients by the National Eye Institute grading system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 102 eyes of 102 patients. Both 1% and 5% PI yielded a marked decrease in bacterial colonies compared with before application ( P < .001). The repeated application of 1% PI showed a significantly lower bacterial count compared with the single application of 5% PI ( P < .05) and resulted in significantly less damage to the corneal epithelium compared with a single 5% PI application ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative repeated applications of 1% PI effectively eradicated ocular surface bacteria equal to that of 5% PI with a less deleterious effect on the corneal epithelium. Our findings suggest that 1% PI may be a promising alternative to 5% PI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"682-687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001436\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:证明在体内眼表重复三次涂抹 1%聚维酮碘 (PI) 与单次涂抹 5%聚维酮碘 (PI) 相比,抗菌效果并无差别,并评估聚维酮碘 (PI) 对角膜上皮的潜在毒性:地点:以色列耶路撒冷 Shaare Zedek 医疗中心眼科部:设计:前瞻性随机双盲研究:方法:患者在手术前随机在眼表单次涂抹 5%PI,或反复冲洗 1%PI。通过在灌洗前后取标准结膜拭子对细菌菌落计数进行定量分析,并比较两组细菌菌落计数的差异。根据美国国家眼科研究所的分级系统对所有患者的浅表点状角膜病进行评估:研究包括 102 位患者的 102 只眼睛。与使用前相比,1% PI 和 5% PI 都能显著减少细菌菌落数(结论:1% PI 和 5% PI 都能显著减少细菌菌落数:术前反复使用 1% PI 能有效根除眼表细菌,其效果与使用 5% PI 相当,但对角膜上皮的有害影响较小。我们的研究结果表明,1% PI 可作为 5% PI 的替代品。
In vivo assessment of antimicrobial activity and toxicity of repeated 1% povidone-iodine applications vs a single 5% povidone-iodine application.
Purpose: To demonstrate the noninferiority in antimicrobial effectiveness of thrice-repeated applications of 1% povidone-iodine (PI) compared with a single application of 5% PI on the ocular surface in vivo and to evaluate potential toxicity of PI to the corneal epithelium.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Methods: Patients randomly received either a single application of 5% PI or repeated irrigations of 1% PI on the ocular surface preoperatively. Bacterial colony counts were quantitatively analyzed by taking standardized conjunctival swabs before and after irrigation, and differences in bacterial colony counts were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of superficial punctate keratopathy was evaluated in all patients by the National Eye Institute grading system.
Results: The study comprised 102 eyes of 102 patients. Both 1% and 5% PI yielded a marked decrease in bacterial colonies compared with before application ( P < .001). The repeated application of 1% PI showed a significantly lower bacterial count compared with the single application of 5% PI ( P < .05) and resulted in significantly less damage to the corneal epithelium compared with a single 5% PI application ( P < .001).
Conclusions: Preoperative repeated applications of 1% PI effectively eradicated ocular surface bacteria equal to that of 5% PI with a less deleterious effect on the corneal epithelium. Our findings suggest that 1% PI may be a promising alternative to 5% PI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.