量化不同体质人群峰值耗氧量方程的基本假设。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1111/cob.12653
Vincent Busque, Jeffrey W. Christle, Kegan J. Moneghetti, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Tatiana Kouznetsova, Yair Blumberg, Matthew T. Wheeler, Euan Ashley, Francois Haddad, Jonathan Myers
{"title":"量化不同体质人群峰值耗氧量方程的基本假设。","authors":"Vincent Busque,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Christle,&nbsp;Kegan J. Moneghetti,&nbsp;Nicholas Cauwenberghs,&nbsp;Tatiana Kouznetsova,&nbsp;Yair Blumberg,&nbsp;Matthew T. Wheeler,&nbsp;Euan Ashley,&nbsp;Francois Haddad,&nbsp;Jonathan Myers","doi":"10.1111/cob.12653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The goal of this study is to quantify the assumptions associated with the Wasserman-Hansen (WH) and Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database (FRIEND) predictive peak oxygen consumption (pVO<sub>2</sub>) equations across body mass index (BMI). Assumptions in pVO<sub>2</sub> for both equations were first determined using a simulation and then evaluated using exercise data from the Stanford Exercise Testing registry. We calculated percent-predicted VO<sub>2</sub> (ppVO<sub>2</sub>) values for both equations and compared them using the Bland–Altman method. Assumptions associated with pVO<sub>2</sub> across BMI categories were quantified by comparing the slopes of age-adjusted VO<sub>2</sub> ratios (pVO<sub>2</sub>/pre-exercise VO<sub>2</sub>) and ppVO<sub>2</sub> values for different BMI categories. The simulation revealed lower predicted fitness among adults with obesity using the FRIEND equation compared to the WH equations. In the clinical cohort, we evaluated 2471 patients (56.9% male, 22% with BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, pVO<sub>2</sub> 26.8 mlO<sub>2</sub>/kg/min). The Bland–Altman plot revealed an average relative difference of −1.7% (95% CI: −2.1 to −1.2%) between WH and FRIEND ppVO<sub>2</sub> values with greater differences among those with obesity. Analysis of the VO<sub>2</sub> ratio to ppVO<sub>2</sub> slopes across the BMI spectrum confirmed the assumption of lower fitness in those with obesity, and this trend was more pronounced using the FRIEND equation. Peak VO<sub>2</sub> estimations between the WH and FRIEND equations differed significantly among individuals with obesity. The FRIEND equation resulted in a greater attributable reduction in pVO<sub>2</sub> associated with obesity relative to the WH equations. The outlined relationships between BMI and predicted VO<sub>2</sub> may better inform the clinical interpretation of ppVO<sub>2</sub> values during cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying assumptions underlying peak oxygen consumption equations across the body mass spectrum\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Busque,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Christle,&nbsp;Kegan J. Moneghetti,&nbsp;Nicholas Cauwenberghs,&nbsp;Tatiana Kouznetsova,&nbsp;Yair Blumberg,&nbsp;Matthew T. Wheeler,&nbsp;Euan Ashley,&nbsp;Francois Haddad,&nbsp;Jonathan Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The goal of this study is to quantify the assumptions associated with the Wasserman-Hansen (WH) and Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database (FRIEND) predictive peak oxygen consumption (pVO<sub>2</sub>) equations across body mass index (BMI). Assumptions in pVO<sub>2</sub> for both equations were first determined using a simulation and then evaluated using exercise data from the Stanford Exercise Testing registry. We calculated percent-predicted VO<sub>2</sub> (ppVO<sub>2</sub>) values for both equations and compared them using the Bland–Altman method. Assumptions associated with pVO<sub>2</sub> across BMI categories were quantified by comparing the slopes of age-adjusted VO<sub>2</sub> ratios (pVO<sub>2</sub>/pre-exercise VO<sub>2</sub>) and ppVO<sub>2</sub> values for different BMI categories. The simulation revealed lower predicted fitness among adults with obesity using the FRIEND equation compared to the WH equations. In the clinical cohort, we evaluated 2471 patients (56.9% male, 22% with BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, pVO<sub>2</sub> 26.8 mlO<sub>2</sub>/kg/min). The Bland–Altman plot revealed an average relative difference of −1.7% (95% CI: −2.1 to −1.2%) between WH and FRIEND ppVO<sub>2</sub> values with greater differences among those with obesity. Analysis of the VO<sub>2</sub> ratio to ppVO<sub>2</sub> slopes across the BMI spectrum confirmed the assumption of lower fitness in those with obesity, and this trend was more pronounced using the FRIEND equation. Peak VO<sub>2</sub> estimations between the WH and FRIEND equations differed significantly among individuals with obesity. The FRIEND equation resulted in a greater attributable reduction in pVO<sub>2</sub> associated with obesity relative to the WH equations. The outlined relationships between BMI and predicted VO<sub>2</sub> may better inform the clinical interpretation of ppVO<sub>2</sub> values during cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluations.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是量化与瓦瑟曼-汉森(Wasserman-Hansen,WH)和体能注册及运动重要性国家数据库(FRIEND)相关的假设:国家数据库(FRIEND)预测峰值耗氧量(pVO2)方程的相关假设。首先通过模拟确定了这两个方程的峰值氧耗量假设,然后使用斯坦福运动测试注册中心的运动数据进行了评估。我们计算了两种方程的预测 VO2 百分比(ppVO2 )值,并使用布兰-阿尔特曼法对其进行了比较。通过比较不同 BMI 类别的年龄调整后 VO2 比率(pVO2 / 运动前 VO2 )和 ppVO2 值的斜率,量化了与不同 BMI 类别的 pVO2 相关的假设。模拟结果显示,与 WH 方程相比,使用 FRIEND 方程预测肥胖症成人的体能较低。在临床队列中,我们评估了 2471 名患者(56.9% 为男性,22% 的体重指数大于 30 kg/m2,ppVO2 为 26.8 mlO2 /kg/min)。布兰德-阿尔特曼图显示,WH 和 FRIEND ppVO2 值之间的平均相对差异为-1.7%(95% CI:-2.1 至-1.2%),肥胖患者之间的差异更大。对整个体重指数范围内的 VO2 比值与 ppVO2 斜率的分析证实了肥胖者体能较低的假设,而使用 FRIEND 方程时这一趋势更加明显。在肥胖症患者中,WH 方程和 FRIEND 方程对峰值 VO2 的估计值差异很大。与 WH 方程相比,FRIEND 方程导致与肥胖相关的 pVO2 下降幅度更大。概述体重指数和预测 VO2 之间的关系可以更好地指导心肺运动测试评估中 ppVO2 值的临床解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying assumptions underlying peak oxygen consumption equations across the body mass spectrum

The goal of this study is to quantify the assumptions associated with the Wasserman-Hansen (WH) and Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database (FRIEND) predictive peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) equations across body mass index (BMI). Assumptions in pVO2 for both equations were first determined using a simulation and then evaluated using exercise data from the Stanford Exercise Testing registry. We calculated percent-predicted VO2 (ppVO2) values for both equations and compared them using the Bland–Altman method. Assumptions associated with pVO2 across BMI categories were quantified by comparing the slopes of age-adjusted VO2 ratios (pVO2/pre-exercise VO2) and ppVO2 values for different BMI categories. The simulation revealed lower predicted fitness among adults with obesity using the FRIEND equation compared to the WH equations. In the clinical cohort, we evaluated 2471 patients (56.9% male, 22% with BMI >30 kg/m2, pVO2 26.8 mlO2/kg/min). The Bland–Altman plot revealed an average relative difference of −1.7% (95% CI: −2.1 to −1.2%) between WH and FRIEND ppVO2 values with greater differences among those with obesity. Analysis of the VO2 ratio to ppVO2 slopes across the BMI spectrum confirmed the assumption of lower fitness in those with obesity, and this trend was more pronounced using the FRIEND equation. Peak VO2 estimations between the WH and FRIEND equations differed significantly among individuals with obesity. The FRIEND equation resulted in a greater attributable reduction in pVO2 associated with obesity relative to the WH equations. The outlined relationships between BMI and predicted VO2 may better inform the clinical interpretation of ppVO2 values during cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信