老年人和认知障碍患者的创意活动

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Francisca S. Rodriguez, Sabrina Ross, Josefin Fruck, Saskia Jaarsveld, Thomas Lachmann
{"title":"老年人和认知障碍患者的创意活动","authors":"Francisca S. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Sabrina Ross,&nbsp;Josefin Fruck,&nbsp;Saskia Jaarsveld,&nbsp;Thomas Lachmann","doi":"10.1002/jocb.637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little is known about creativity in old age. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the intensity of engaging in creative activities differs between older and younger people as well as older people with and without cognitive impairment. Moreover, we evaluated associations of creative activities with specific cognitive abilities. For this cross-sectional study, groups of younger people (<i>n</i> = 24), older cognitively healthy people (<i>n</i> = 24), and older cognitively impaired people (<i>n</i> = 23) were recruited via convenience sampling. Creative activities were assessed via the creative behavior inventory (CBI). Cognitive abilities were assessed via trail making test (TMT), standard progressive matrices (SPM), creative reasoning task (CRT), test of creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP), and alternate uses task (AUT). The intensity of engaging in creative activities was higher among younger people but was not significantly associated with being cognitively impaired. Only two cognitive abilities, the creative thinking scores CRT-Components and TCT-DP-Original, predicted creative activities. Both did not differ significantly between cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired older adults. The findings suggest that cognitively impaired older people still engage in creative activities, which might be due to their relatively sound creative thinking. Further studies should investigate whether engaging in creative activities can mitigate cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jocb.637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative Activities Among Older Adults and People With Cognitive Impairment\",\"authors\":\"Francisca S. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Sabrina Ross,&nbsp;Josefin Fruck,&nbsp;Saskia Jaarsveld,&nbsp;Thomas Lachmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jocb.637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Little is known about creativity in old age. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the intensity of engaging in creative activities differs between older and younger people as well as older people with and without cognitive impairment. Moreover, we evaluated associations of creative activities with specific cognitive abilities. For this cross-sectional study, groups of younger people (<i>n</i> = 24), older cognitively healthy people (<i>n</i> = 24), and older cognitively impaired people (<i>n</i> = 23) were recruited via convenience sampling. Creative activities were assessed via the creative behavior inventory (CBI). Cognitive abilities were assessed via trail making test (TMT), standard progressive matrices (SPM), creative reasoning task (CRT), test of creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP), and alternate uses task (AUT). The intensity of engaging in creative activities was higher among younger people but was not significantly associated with being cognitively impaired. Only two cognitive abilities, the creative thinking scores CRT-Components and TCT-DP-Original, predicted creative activities. Both did not differ significantly between cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired older adults. The findings suggest that cognitively impaired older people still engage in creative activities, which might be due to their relatively sound creative thinking. Further studies should investigate whether engaging in creative activities can mitigate cognitive decline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jocb.637\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对老年人的创造力知之甚少。本研究旨在调查老年人和年轻人以及有认知障碍和无认知障碍的老年人参与创造性活动的强度有多大差异。此外,我们还评估了创造性活动与特定认知能力之间的关联。在这项横断面研究中,我们通过方便抽样的方式招募了年轻人(24 人)、认知能力健康的老年人(24 人)和认知能力受损的老年人(23 人)。创造性活动通过创造性行为清单(CBI)进行评估。认知能力通过线索制作测试(TMT)、标准渐进矩阵(SPM)、创造性推理任务(CRT)、创造性思维-绘画制作测试(TCT-DP)和交替使用任务(AUT)进行评估。参与创造性活动的强度在年轻人中更高,但与认知障碍没有显著关联。只有两种认知能力,即创造性思维分数 CRT-Components 和 TCT-DP-Original 可以预测创造性活动。这两种能力在认知健康的老年人和认知受损的老年人之间没有明显差异。研究结果表明,认知功能受损的老年人仍然会从事创造性活动,这可能是因为他们的创造性思维相对健全。进一步的研究应探讨参与创造性活动是否能缓解认知能力衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Creative Activities Among Older Adults and People With Cognitive Impairment

Creative Activities Among Older Adults and People With Cognitive Impairment

Little is known about creativity in old age. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the intensity of engaging in creative activities differs between older and younger people as well as older people with and without cognitive impairment. Moreover, we evaluated associations of creative activities with specific cognitive abilities. For this cross-sectional study, groups of younger people (n = 24), older cognitively healthy people (n = 24), and older cognitively impaired people (n = 23) were recruited via convenience sampling. Creative activities were assessed via the creative behavior inventory (CBI). Cognitive abilities were assessed via trail making test (TMT), standard progressive matrices (SPM), creative reasoning task (CRT), test of creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP), and alternate uses task (AUT). The intensity of engaging in creative activities was higher among younger people but was not significantly associated with being cognitively impaired. Only two cognitive abilities, the creative thinking scores CRT-Components and TCT-DP-Original, predicted creative activities. Both did not differ significantly between cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired older adults. The findings suggest that cognitively impaired older people still engage in creative activities, which might be due to their relatively sound creative thinking. Further studies should investigate whether engaging in creative activities can mitigate cognitive decline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信