社会经济地位与体外受精受孕围产期结果之间的关系

Misha Fotovati DEC , Ahmad M. Badeghiesh MD, MPH , Haitham A. Baghlaf MD, MPH, RDMS , Michael H. Dahan MD
{"title":"社会经济地位与体外受精受孕围产期结果之间的关系","authors":"Misha Fotovati DEC ,&nbsp;Ahmad M. Badeghiesh MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Haitham A. Baghlaf MD, MPH, RDMS ,&nbsp;Michael H. Dahan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>In vitro fertilization is the most used assisted reproductive technology in the United States that is increasing in efficiency and in demand. Certain states have mandated coverage that enable individuals with low income to undergo in vitro fertilization treatment.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate if socioeconomic status has an impact on the perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. We hypothesized that with greater coverage there may be an alleviation of the financial burden of in vitro fertilization that can facilitate the application of evidence-based practices.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><p>This was a retrospective, population-based, observational study that was conducted in accordance with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–Nationwide Inpatient Sample database over the 6-year period from 2008 to 2014 during which period 10,000 in vitro fertilization deliveries were examined. Maternal outcomes of interest included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm birth (ie, before 37 weeks of gestation), placental abruption, cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, spontaneous vaginal delivery, maternal infection, chorioamnionitis, hysterectomy, and postpartum hemorrhage. Neonatal outcomes included small for gestational age neonates, defined as birthweight &lt;10th percentile, intrauterine fetal death, and congenital anomalies.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Our study found that the socioeconomic status did not have a statistically relevant effect on the perinatal outcomes among women who underwent in vitro fertilization to conceive after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of maternal demographic, preexisting clinical characteristics, and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The literature suggests that in states with mandated in vitro fertilization coverage, there are better perinatal outcomes because, in part, of the increased use of best in vitro fertilization practices, such as single-embryo transfers. Moreover, the quality of medical care in states with coverage is in the highest quartile in the country. Therefore, our findings of equivalent perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization care irrespective of socioeconomic status possibly suggests that a lack of access to quality medical care may be a factor in the health disparities usually seen among individuals with lower socioeconomic status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000236/pdfft?md5=1ca9aa24dfba3537ce5549af9eeb0e8b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions\",\"authors\":\"Misha Fotovati DEC ,&nbsp;Ahmad M. Badeghiesh MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Haitham A. Baghlaf MD, MPH, RDMS ,&nbsp;Michael H. Dahan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>In vitro fertilization is the most used assisted reproductive technology in the United States that is increasing in efficiency and in demand. Certain states have mandated coverage that enable individuals with low income to undergo in vitro fertilization treatment.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate if socioeconomic status has an impact on the perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. We hypothesized that with greater coverage there may be an alleviation of the financial burden of in vitro fertilization that can facilitate the application of evidence-based practices.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><p>This was a retrospective, population-based, observational study that was conducted in accordance with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–Nationwide Inpatient Sample database over the 6-year period from 2008 to 2014 during which period 10,000 in vitro fertilization deliveries were examined. Maternal outcomes of interest included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm birth (ie, before 37 weeks of gestation), placental abruption, cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, spontaneous vaginal delivery, maternal infection, chorioamnionitis, hysterectomy, and postpartum hemorrhage. Neonatal outcomes included small for gestational age neonates, defined as birthweight &lt;10th percentile, intrauterine fetal death, and congenital anomalies.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Our study found that the socioeconomic status did not have a statistically relevant effect on the perinatal outcomes among women who underwent in vitro fertilization to conceive after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of maternal demographic, preexisting clinical characteristics, and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The literature suggests that in states with mandated in vitro fertilization coverage, there are better perinatal outcomes because, in part, of the increased use of best in vitro fertilization practices, such as single-embryo transfers. Moreover, the quality of medical care in states with coverage is in the highest quartile in the country. Therefore, our findings of equivalent perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization care irrespective of socioeconomic status possibly suggests that a lack of access to quality medical care may be a factor in the health disparities usually seen among individuals with lower socioeconomic status.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000236/pdfft?md5=1ca9aa24dfba3537ce5549af9eeb0e8b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000236-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景体外受精是美国最常用的辅助生殖技术,其效率和需求都在不断提高。本研究旨在评估社会经济状况是否会对体外受精妊娠的围产期结果产生影响。我们假设,随着覆盖面的扩大,体外受精的经济负担可能会减轻,从而促进循证实践的应用。研究设计这是一项基于人群的回顾性观察研究,根据医疗成本与利用项目--全国住院病人抽样数据库进行,时间跨度为2008年至2014年,为期6年,在此期间对10,000例体外受精分娩进行了研究。孕产妇的相关结果包括产前胎膜早破、早产(即妊娠 37 周前)、胎盘早剥、剖宫产、手术阴道分娩、自然阴道分娩、孕产妇感染、绒毛膜羊膜炎、子宫切除和产后出血。结果我们的研究发现,在对产妇人口统计学、既往临床特征和合并症的潜在混杂影响进行调整后,社会经济状况对接受体外受精受孕的妇女的围产期结局没有统计学意义上的影响。结论 文献表明,在强制实施体外受精的州,围产期结果较好,部分原因是采用了更多的最佳体外受精方法,如单胚胎移植。此外,在有医疗保险的州,医疗质量也处于全国最高的四分之一。因此,我们的研究结果表明,无论社会经济地位如何,体外受精治疗的围产期结果都是相同的,这可能表明,缺乏获得优质医疗服务的机会可能是导致社会经济地位较低的人之间出现健康差异的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions

BACKGROUND

In vitro fertilization is the most used assisted reproductive technology in the United States that is increasing in efficiency and in demand. Certain states have mandated coverage that enable individuals with low income to undergo in vitro fertilization treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate if socioeconomic status has an impact on the perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. We hypothesized that with greater coverage there may be an alleviation of the financial burden of in vitro fertilization that can facilitate the application of evidence-based practices.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective, population-based, observational study that was conducted in accordance with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–Nationwide Inpatient Sample database over the 6-year period from 2008 to 2014 during which period 10,000 in vitro fertilization deliveries were examined. Maternal outcomes of interest included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm birth (ie, before 37 weeks of gestation), placental abruption, cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, spontaneous vaginal delivery, maternal infection, chorioamnionitis, hysterectomy, and postpartum hemorrhage. Neonatal outcomes included small for gestational age neonates, defined as birthweight <10th percentile, intrauterine fetal death, and congenital anomalies.

RESULTS

Our study found that the socioeconomic status did not have a statistically relevant effect on the perinatal outcomes among women who underwent in vitro fertilization to conceive after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of maternal demographic, preexisting clinical characteristics, and comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests that in states with mandated in vitro fertilization coverage, there are better perinatal outcomes because, in part, of the increased use of best in vitro fertilization practices, such as single-embryo transfers. Moreover, the quality of medical care in states with coverage is in the highest quartile in the country. Therefore, our findings of equivalent perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization care irrespective of socioeconomic status possibly suggests that a lack of access to quality medical care may be a factor in the health disparities usually seen among individuals with lower socioeconomic status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信