核磁共振成像环境中颅内电极的安全性:技术报告。

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD, Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR), Jeremy Barber BSc, Benjamin Osa BSME, Keven Clifford RT, Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA
{"title":"核磁共振成像环境中颅内电极的安全性:技术报告。","authors":"Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD,&nbsp;Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR),&nbsp;Jeremy Barber BSc,&nbsp;Benjamin Osa BSME,&nbsp;Keven Clifford RT,&nbsp;Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"461-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report\",\"authors\":\"Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD,&nbsp;Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR),&nbsp;Jeremy Barber BSc,&nbsp;Benjamin Osa BSME,&nbsp;Keven Clifford RT,&nbsp;Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"71 3\",\"pages\":\"461-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:颅内脑电图(iEEG)是指在药物难治性癫痫患者的颅内放置电极以定位癫痫发作。虽然核磁共振成像(MRI)可在患者特定的解剖结构中看到电极,但在常规临床应用之前必须确认这些电极的安全性。因此,本研究旨在评估特定制造商生产的 iEEG 电极在 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) 磁共振成像环境中的安全性:方法:使用标准化技术对 10 个测试物品中的每个物品进行磁感应位移力和扭矩测量。随后,在开放和 "故障 "两种条件下,使用透镜模型对测试物品进行射频诱导加热评估。此外,我们还在开放和 "故障 "两种条件下评估了射频(RF)诱导的加热,将所有测试物品同时放入模型中,以模拟植入。最后,对每个试验品进行核磁共振成像伪影评估:结果:所有测试物品的磁感应位移力都小于重力对物品的作用力。同样,除 8 触点带材(其最大磁感应扭矩比其大 11%)和 depthalon 帽外,所有测试物品的最大磁感应扭矩都小于重力造成的最坏情况扭矩。对任何测试物品的任何部分进行单独评估,其最大温度变化为 1.7°C,而对于要植入颅内的任何设备组件,其最大温度变化为 1.2°C。在植入配置中,记录到的最大温度变化为 0.7°C:结论:在某些条件下,3.0T 磁共振成像可安全地定位 iEEG 电极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report

Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report

Introduction

Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.

Methods

Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.

Results

The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.

Conclusions

MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信