Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD, Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR), Jeremy Barber BSc, Benjamin Osa BSME, Keven Clifford RT, Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA
{"title":"核磁共振成像环境中颅内电极的安全性:技术报告。","authors":"Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD, Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR), Jeremy Barber BSc, Benjamin Osa BSME, Keven Clifford RT, Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"461-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report\",\"authors\":\"Yarema B. Bezchlibnyk MD, PhD, Rolando Quiles RT(R)(MR), Jeremy Barber BSc, Benjamin Osa BSME, Keven Clifford RT, Ryan Murtaugh MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"71 3\",\"pages\":\"461-473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of intracranial electrodes in an MRI environment: a technical report
Introduction
Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) involves placing intracranial electrodes to localise seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables visualisation of electrodes within patient-specific anatomy, the safety of these electrodes must be confirmed prior to routine clinical utilisation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of iEEG electrodes from a particular manufacturer in a 3.0-Tesla (3.0T) MRI environment.
Methods
Measurements of magnetically induced displacement force and torque were determined for each of the 10 test articles using standardised techniques. Test articles were subsequently evaluated for radiofrequency-induced heating using a Perspex phantom in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Additionally, we assessed radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating with all test articles placed into the phantom simultaneously to simulate an implantation, again in both open and ‘fault’ conditions. Finally, each test article was evaluated for MRI artefacts.
Results
The magnetically induced displacement force was found to be less than the force on the article due to gravity for all test articles. Similarly, the maximum magnetically induced torque was less than the worst-case torque due to gravity for all test articles apart from the 8-contact strip – for which it was 11% greater – and the depthalon cap. The maximum temperature change for any portion of any test article assessed individually was 1.7°C, or 1.2°C for any device component meant to be implanted intracranially. In the implantation configuration, the maximum recorded temperature change was 0.7°C.
Conclusions
MRI may be safely performed for localising iEEG electrodes at 3.0T under certain conditions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).