{"title":"人工耳蜗植入患者语音处理器的选择：一家三级医院的经验。","authors":"Sung-Min Park, Yejun Chun, Byung Yoon Choi","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are two types of speech processors used in CI devices: behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients and revision cases in relation to the type of speech processors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 452 ears that underwent CI was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with severe inner ear anomalies (91.7%) more frequently preferred BTE speech processors than those without severe inner ear anomalies (<i>p</i> = .000). The magnet strength used in OTE speech processor users was significantly higher than in BTE speech processor users (<i>p</i> = .002). In cochlear implantees who underwent surgery before 12 months of age, the magnet strength in the revision group was greater than in the non-revision group (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when choosing the type of speech processor and modifying the magnet strength of the implant device. The choice between BTE and OTE speech processors led to different required magnet strengths, contributing to the occurrence of skin flap inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of speech processor in cochlear implant patients: experience in a tertiary hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Min Park, Yejun Chun, Byung Yoon Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are two types of speech processors used in CI devices: behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients and revision cases in relation to the type of speech processors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 452 ears that underwent CI was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with severe inner ear anomalies (91.7%) more frequently preferred BTE speech processors than those without severe inner ear anomalies (<i>p</i> = .000). The magnet strength used in OTE speech processor users was significantly higher than in BTE speech processor users (<i>p</i> = .002). In cochlear implantees who underwent surgery before 12 months of age, the magnet strength in the revision group was greater than in the non-revision group (<i>p</i> = .025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when choosing the type of speech processor and modifying the magnet strength of the implant device. The choice between BTE and OTE speech processors led to different required magnet strengths, contributing to the occurrence of skin flap inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"91-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2318762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selection of speech processor in cochlear implant patients: experience in a tertiary hospital.
Background: There are two types of speech processors used in CI devices: behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE).
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients and revision cases in relation to the type of speech processors.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 452 ears that underwent CI was performed.
Results: Children with severe inner ear anomalies (91.7%) more frequently preferred BTE speech processors than those without severe inner ear anomalies (p = .000). The magnet strength used in OTE speech processor users was significantly higher than in BTE speech processor users (p = .002). In cochlear implantees who underwent surgery before 12 months of age, the magnet strength in the revision group was greater than in the non-revision group (p = .025).
Conclusions and significance: Overall, our findings suggest factors to consider when choosing the type of speech processor and modifying the magnet strength of the implant device. The choice between BTE and OTE speech processors led to different required magnet strengths, contributing to the occurrence of skin flap inflammation.
期刊介绍：
Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
