编者按磁锚技术辅助内镜黏膜下早期胃癌切除术的动物实验研究。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Enrico Fiori, Antonietta Lamazza, Daniele Crocetti, Antonio V Sterpetti
{"title":"编者按磁锚技术辅助内镜黏膜下早期胃癌切除术的动物实验研究。","authors":"Enrico Fiori, Antonietta Lamazza, Daniele Crocetti, Antonio V Sterpetti","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v16.i2.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the <i>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</i> 2023; 15 (11): 634-680. Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall prevalence of GC has declined, although that of proximal GC has increased over time. Thus, a significant proportion of GC cases and deaths can be avoided if preventive interventions are taken. Early GC (EGC) is defined as GC confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Endoscopic resection is considered the most appropriate treatment for precancerous gastrointestinal lesions improving patient quality of life, with reduced rates of complications, shorter hospitalization period, and lower costs when compared to surgical resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) are representative endoscopic treatments for EGC and precancerous gastric lesions. Standard EMR implies injection of a saline solution into the sub-mucosal space, followed by excision of the lesion using a snare. Complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. When using conventional EMR methods for lesions less than 1 cm in size, the complete resection rate is approximately 60%, whereas for lesions larger than 2 cm, the complete resection rate is low (20%-30%). ESD can be used to remove tumors exceeding 2 cm in diameter and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis. Compared with EMR, ESD has higher en bloc resection rates (90.2% <i>vs</i> 51.7%), higher complete resection rates (82.1 <i>vs</i> 42.2%), and lower recurrence rates (0.65% <i>vs</i> 6.05%). Thus, innovative techniques have been introduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 2","pages":"51-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial article to: Animal experimental study on magnetic anchor technique-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Fiori, Antonietta Lamazza, Daniele Crocetti, Antonio V Sterpetti\",\"doi\":\"10.4253/wjge.v16.i2.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the <i>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</i> 2023; 15 (11): 634-680. Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall prevalence of GC has declined, although that of proximal GC has increased over time. Thus, a significant proportion of GC cases and deaths can be avoided if preventive interventions are taken. Early GC (EGC) is defined as GC confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Endoscopic resection is considered the most appropriate treatment for precancerous gastrointestinal lesions improving patient quality of life, with reduced rates of complications, shorter hospitalization period, and lower costs when compared to surgical resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) are representative endoscopic treatments for EGC and precancerous gastric lesions. Standard EMR implies injection of a saline solution into the sub-mucosal space, followed by excision of the lesion using a snare. Complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. When using conventional EMR methods for lesions less than 1 cm in size, the complete resection rate is approximately 60%, whereas for lesions larger than 2 cm, the complete resection rate is low (20%-30%). ESD can be used to remove tumors exceeding 2 cm in diameter and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis. Compared with EMR, ESD has higher en bloc resection rates (90.2% <i>vs</i> 51.7%), higher complete resection rates (82.1 <i>vs</i> 42.2%), and lower recurrence rates (0.65% <i>vs</i> 6.05%). Thus, innovative techniques have been introduced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"51-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921155/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i2.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i2.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇社论中,我们对最近一期《世界消化内镜杂志》(World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023; 15 (11): 634-680)上发表的文章进行了评论。胃癌(GC)仍然是全球第五大常见恶性肿瘤和第四大癌症相关死亡原因。随着时间的推移,胃癌的总体发病率有所下降,但近端胃癌的发病率却有所上升。因此,如果采取预防性干预措施,很大一部分 GC 病例和死亡是可以避免的。早期胃癌(EGC)是指局限于粘膜或粘膜下层的胃癌。与手术切除相比,内镜切除被认为是最适合胃肠道癌前病变的治疗方法,可改善患者的生活质量,降低并发症发生率,缩短住院时间,降低费用。内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)是治疗EGC和胃癌前病变的代表性内镜疗法。标准的黏膜切除术是指将生理盐水注入黏膜下间隙,然后使用套管切除病灶。完全切除率因病变的大小和严重程度而异。对小于 1 厘米的病变采用传统的 EMR 方法时,完全切除率约为 60%,而对大于 2 厘米的病变,完全切除率较低(20%-30%)。ESD可用于切除直径超过2厘米的肿瘤以及伴有溃疡或粘膜下纤维化的病灶。与 EMR 相比,ESD 的全切率更高(90.2% 对 51.7%),完全切除率更高(82.1% 对 42.2%),复发率更低(0.65% 对 6.05%)。因此,创新技术应运而生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial article to: Animal experimental study on magnetic anchor technique-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.

In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023; 15 (11): 634-680. Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall prevalence of GC has declined, although that of proximal GC has increased over time. Thus, a significant proportion of GC cases and deaths can be avoided if preventive interventions are taken. Early GC (EGC) is defined as GC confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Endoscopic resection is considered the most appropriate treatment for precancerous gastrointestinal lesions improving patient quality of life, with reduced rates of complications, shorter hospitalization period, and lower costs when compared to surgical resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) are representative endoscopic treatments for EGC and precancerous gastric lesions. Standard EMR implies injection of a saline solution into the sub-mucosal space, followed by excision of the lesion using a snare. Complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. When using conventional EMR methods for lesions less than 1 cm in size, the complete resection rate is approximately 60%, whereas for lesions larger than 2 cm, the complete resection rate is low (20%-30%). ESD can be used to remove tumors exceeding 2 cm in diameter and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis. Compared with EMR, ESD has higher en bloc resection rates (90.2% vs 51.7%), higher complete resection rates (82.1 vs 42.2%), and lower recurrence rates (0.65% vs 6.05%). Thus, innovative techniques have been introduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信