左心室辅助装置受术者植入前后的内窥镜检查:单中心经验。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.14740/gr1661
Wael T Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Fouad Jaber, Mohamed K Ahmed, Hassan M Ghoz, Brett W Sperry, Wendell K Clarkston
{"title":"左心室辅助装置受术者植入前后的内窥镜检查:单中心经验。","authors":"Wael T Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Fouad Jaber, Mohamed K Ahmed, Hassan M Ghoz, Brett W Sperry, Wendell K Clarkston","doi":"10.14740/gr1661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is common in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients, but the optimal screening approach before LVAD implantation is still unclear. The aim of the study was to describe our experience with pre- and post-LVAD implantation endoscopic screening and subsequent GI bleeding in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted among all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at Saint Luke's Hospital, between 2010 and 2020. The data were reviewed to determine the yield and safety of endoscopic procedures performed within 1 month before LVAD placement and the incidence of GIB within 1 year after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 LVAD patients met the inclusion criteria, and 23 underwent pre-implantation endoscopic evaluation. Angiodysplasia had a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of 9.41 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.01 - 44.09) in post-LVAD endoscopy, while there was no significant difference in bleeding from other sources such as peptic ulcer disease or diverticular bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of GIB in patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD GIB (32.6% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.64). Endoscopy was well-tolerated in this cohort, and argon plasma coagulation was the most commonly used intervention to achieve hemostasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our results, we recommend against routine pre-LVAD endoscopic screening. Instead, we suggest an individualized approach, where decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre- and Post-Implant Endoscopy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Wael T Mohamed, Vinay Jahagirdar, Fouad Jaber, Mohamed K Ahmed, Hassan M Ghoz, Brett W Sperry, Wendell K Clarkston\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/gr1661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is common in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients, but the optimal screening approach before LVAD implantation is still unclear. The aim of the study was to describe our experience with pre- and post-LVAD implantation endoscopic screening and subsequent GI bleeding in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted among all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at Saint Luke's Hospital, between 2010 and 2020. The data were reviewed to determine the yield and safety of endoscopic procedures performed within 1 month before LVAD placement and the incidence of GIB within 1 year after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 LVAD patients met the inclusion criteria, and 23 underwent pre-implantation endoscopic evaluation. Angiodysplasia had a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of 9.41 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.01 - 44.09) in post-LVAD endoscopy, while there was no significant difference in bleeding from other sources such as peptic ulcer disease or diverticular bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of GIB in patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD GIB (32.6% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.64). Endoscopy was well-tolerated in this cohort, and argon plasma coagulation was the most commonly used intervention to achieve hemostasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our results, we recommend against routine pre-LVAD endoscopic screening. Instead, we suggest an individualized approach, where decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃肠道出血(GIB)在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中很常见,但 LVAD 植入前的最佳筛查方法仍不明确。本研究旨在描述我们在 LVAD 植入前后进行内镜筛查的经验以及该人群随后发生消化道出血的情况:方法:我们对 2010 年至 2020 年期间在圣卢克医院接受 LVAD 植入术的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。方法:对 2010 年至 2020 年期间在圣路加医院接受 LVAD 植入术的所有患者进行回顾性研究,以确定 LVAD 植入术前 1 个月内进行内窥镜手术的收益率和安全性,以及植入术后 1 年内 GIB 的发生率:共有 167 名 LVAD 患者符合纳入标准,其中 23 人接受了植入前内镜评估。在LVAD植入后的内镜检查中,血管增生症的几率比(OR)明显较高,为9.41(95%置信区间(CI):2.01 - 44.09),而消化性溃疡病或憩室出血等其他原因引起的出血则无明显差异。在LVAD前接受内镜评估的患者中,GIB的发生率与LVAD后GIB的发生率相比没有差异(32.6% vs. 39.1%,P = 0.64)。该组患者对内镜检查的耐受性良好,氩等离子体凝固是最常用的止血干预措施:根据我们的研究结果,我们建议不要进行常规的 LVAD 术前内镜筛查。结论:根据我们的研究结果,我们建议不要进行常规的 LVAD 术前内镜筛查,而应采取个体化的方法,根据具体情况做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre- and Post-Implant Endoscopy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is common in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients, but the optimal screening approach before LVAD implantation is still unclear. The aim of the study was to describe our experience with pre- and post-LVAD implantation endoscopic screening and subsequent GI bleeding in this cohort.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted among all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at Saint Luke's Hospital, between 2010 and 2020. The data were reviewed to determine the yield and safety of endoscopic procedures performed within 1 month before LVAD placement and the incidence of GIB within 1 year after implantation.

Results: A total of 167 LVAD patients met the inclusion criteria, and 23 underwent pre-implantation endoscopic evaluation. Angiodysplasia had a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of 9.41 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.01 - 44.09) in post-LVAD endoscopy, while there was no significant difference in bleeding from other sources such as peptic ulcer disease or diverticular bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of GIB in patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD GIB (32.6% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.64). Endoscopy was well-tolerated in this cohort, and argon plasma coagulation was the most commonly used intervention to achieve hemostasis.

Conclusions: According to our results, we recommend against routine pre-LVAD endoscopic screening. Instead, we suggest an individualized approach, where decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信