颈部指导性运动疗法对鞭打后恢复的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Pablo Muñoz Lazcano, Daniel Rojano Ortega, Isidro Fernández López
{"title":"颈部指导性运动疗法对鞭打后恢复的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Pablo Muñoz Lazcano, Daniel Rojano Ortega, Isidro Fernández López","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects on pain and disability recovery after a whiplash of a guided neck-specific exercise therapy, compared to a different or an unguided neck-specific exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A literature search was conducted from inception to May 31, 2023, in three electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analyses were performed with Review Manager software. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was used to measure the effect sizes and only short-term time points were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Not all studies reported a significant decrease of pain and disability in the neck-specific exercise group compared to controls. However, meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in neck pain (standardized mean difference: -0.25; 95% confidence interval: [-0.38, -0.12]; P = 0.0002) and neck-disability index (standardized mean difference: -0.35; 95% confidence interval: [-0.54, -0.15]; P = 0.0005) in the neck-specific exercise group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to the benefits that a guided neck-specific exercise therapy has on motivation and program adherence, it provides greater benefits in pain and disability than a different or unguided neck-specific exercise therapy. Positive results are observed primarily with intervention periods of more than 6 wks and at least two sessions per week.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the impact that whiplash-associated disorders have on a patient's life; (2) Identify and recognize the greater benefits of a supervised exercise therapy on recovery after a whiplash injury; and (3) Differentiate between the different exercise protocols conducted (types of exercises and duration) and incorporate therapy appropriately as part of an effective treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"971-978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Guided Neck-Specific Exercise Therapy on Recovery After a Whiplash: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Muñoz Lazcano, Daniel Rojano Ortega, Isidro Fernández López\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effects on pain and disability recovery after a whiplash of a guided neck-specific exercise therapy, compared to a different or an unguided neck-specific exercise therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A literature search was conducted from inception to May 31, 2023, in three electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analyses were performed with Review Manager software. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was used to measure the effect sizes and only short-term time points were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Not all studies reported a significant decrease of pain and disability in the neck-specific exercise group compared to controls. However, meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in neck pain (standardized mean difference: -0.25; 95% confidence interval: [-0.38, -0.12]; P = 0.0002) and neck-disability index (standardized mean difference: -0.35; 95% confidence interval: [-0.54, -0.15]; P = 0.0005) in the neck-specific exercise group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to the benefits that a guided neck-specific exercise therapy has on motivation and program adherence, it provides greater benefits in pain and disability than a different or unguided neck-specific exercise therapy. Positive results are observed primarily with intervention periods of more than 6 wks and at least two sessions per week.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the impact that whiplash-associated disorders have on a patient's life; (2) Identify and recognize the greater benefits of a supervised exercise therapy on recovery after a whiplash injury; and (3) Differentiate between the different exercise protocols conducted (types of exercises and duration) and incorporate therapy appropriately as part of an effective treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"971-978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析有指导的颈部特异性锻炼(NSE)疗法与不同的或无指导的NSE疗法相比,对鞭打后疼痛和残疾恢复的影响:设计:从开始到 2023 年 5 月 31 日,在三个电子数据库中进行了文献检索:PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Web of Science。共纳入 11 项随机对照试验。使用Review Manager软件进行了元分析。采用标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)来衡量效应大小,并且只考虑短期时间点:结果:并非所有研究都表明,与对照组相比,NSE 组的疼痛和残疾程度明显减轻。然而,荟萃分析表明,NSE 组的颈部疼痛(SMD:-0.25;95% CI:[-0.38,-0.12];P = 0.0002)和颈部残疾指数(SMD:-0.35;95% CI:[-0.54,-0.15];P = 0.0005)明显减少:结论:指导性 NSE疗法除了对动机和计划的坚持有好处外,还比不同的或无指导的 NSE疗法对疼痛和残疾有更大的益处。主要在干预时间超过六周且每周至少进行两次治疗的情况下才能观察到积极效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a Guided Neck-Specific Exercise Therapy on Recovery After a Whiplash: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: To analyze the effects on pain and disability recovery after a whiplash of a guided neck-specific exercise therapy, compared to a different or an unguided neck-specific exercise therapy.

Design: A literature search was conducted from inception to May 31, 2023, in three electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analyses were performed with Review Manager software. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval was used to measure the effect sizes and only short-term time points were considered.

Results: Not all studies reported a significant decrease of pain and disability in the neck-specific exercise group compared to controls. However, meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in neck pain (standardized mean difference: -0.25; 95% confidence interval: [-0.38, -0.12]; P = 0.0002) and neck-disability index (standardized mean difference: -0.35; 95% confidence interval: [-0.54, -0.15]; P = 0.0005) in the neck-specific exercise group.

Conclusions: In addition to the benefits that a guided neck-specific exercise therapy has on motivation and program adherence, it provides greater benefits in pain and disability than a different or unguided neck-specific exercise therapy. Positive results are observed primarily with intervention periods of more than 6 wks and at least two sessions per week.

To claim cme credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.

Cme objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the impact that whiplash-associated disorders have on a patient's life; (2) Identify and recognize the greater benefits of a supervised exercise therapy on recovery after a whiplash injury; and (3) Differentiate between the different exercise protocols conducted (types of exercises and duration) and incorporate therapy appropriately as part of an effective treatment plan.

Level: Advanced.

Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信