马拉维土壤法中的土地退化中立性以及避免、减少和扭转优先事项的薄弱性

Tupalishe Mulwafu , Garton Kamchedzera
{"title":"马拉维土壤法中的土地退化中立性以及避免、减少和扭转优先事项的薄弱性","authors":"Tupalishe Mulwafu ,&nbsp;Garton Kamchedzera","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article concludes that the pertinent Malawi soil laws on land degradation neutrality (LDN) have weak Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The article uses Roscoe Pound's theory of social engineering to underline ecological interdependence as an overriding interest in resolving the interests of people and nature. Using a doctrinal and comparative approach, the article identifies provisions in Uganda and Germany's soil-dedicated legal frameworks that incorporate the Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The analysis leads to the finding that unlike in Germany and Uganda, there is a reticent consideration of soil conservation in Malawi's soil-related legislation to get soil users to Avoid, Reduce and Reverse. This is because Malawi's approach to soil conservation is human-centered; lacking an ecocentric and deep ecology approach to inform the legislation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700622400008X/pdfft?md5=6abc56e8e6b51aace20a1d79813d8ab5&pid=1-s2.0-S266700622400008X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Land degradation neutrality and the weak avoid, reduce and reverse priorities in Malawi's soil laws\",\"authors\":\"Tupalishe Mulwafu ,&nbsp;Garton Kamchedzera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article concludes that the pertinent Malawi soil laws on land degradation neutrality (LDN) have weak Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The article uses Roscoe Pound's theory of social engineering to underline ecological interdependence as an overriding interest in resolving the interests of people and nature. Using a doctrinal and comparative approach, the article identifies provisions in Uganda and Germany's soil-dedicated legal frameworks that incorporate the Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The analysis leads to the finding that unlike in Germany and Uganda, there is a reticent consideration of soil conservation in Malawi's soil-related legislation to get soil users to Avoid, Reduce and Reverse. This is because Malawi's approach to soil conservation is human-centered; lacking an ecocentric and deep ecology approach to inform the legislation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700622400008X/pdfft?md5=6abc56e8e6b51aace20a1d79813d8ab5&pid=1-s2.0-S266700622400008X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700622400008X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700622400008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的结论是,马拉维关于土地退化中性(LDN)的相关土壤法律在 "避免"(Avoid)、"减少"(Reduce)和 "逆转"(Reverse)优先事项方面存在不足。文章采用罗斯科-庞德(Roscoe Pound)的社会工程理论,强调生态相互依存是解决人与自然利益问题的首要利益。文章采用理论和比较方法,确定了乌干达和德国土壤专用法律框架中包含 "避免"、"减少 "和 "逆转 "优先事项的条款。分析结果表明,与德国和乌干达不同,马拉维的土壤相关立法中对土壤保护的考虑并不多,只是让土壤使用者避免、减少和逆转。这是因为马拉维的土壤保护方法是以人为本的,缺乏以生态为中心的深层生态学方法来指导立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Land degradation neutrality and the weak avoid, reduce and reverse priorities in Malawi's soil laws

This article concludes that the pertinent Malawi soil laws on land degradation neutrality (LDN) have weak Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The article uses Roscoe Pound's theory of social engineering to underline ecological interdependence as an overriding interest in resolving the interests of people and nature. Using a doctrinal and comparative approach, the article identifies provisions in Uganda and Germany's soil-dedicated legal frameworks that incorporate the Avoid, Reduce, and Reverse priorities. The analysis leads to the finding that unlike in Germany and Uganda, there is a reticent consideration of soil conservation in Malawi's soil-related legislation to get soil users to Avoid, Reduce and Reverse. This is because Malawi's approach to soil conservation is human-centered; lacking an ecocentric and deep ecology approach to inform the legislation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信