对非上皮性卵巢肿瘤临床流行病学方面的见解,强调诊断和量身定制的手术方法;一项单一机构回顾性研究

Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif
{"title":"对非上皮性卵巢肿瘤临床流行病学方面的见解,强调诊断和量身定制的手术方法;一项单一机构回顾性研究","authors":"Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif","doi":"10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .","PeriodicalId":428417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into the Clinico-Epidemiological Aspects of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Tumor Emphasizing Diagnosis and Tailored Surgical Approach; a Single Institutional Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .\",\"PeriodicalId\":428417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卵巢癌约占女性肿瘤总数的 27%,其中非上皮性卵巢细胞癌非常罕见,约占卵巢癌病例总数的 10%。本研究的目的是识别以 OAS、DFS 和 PFS 形式报告生存结果的预后因素。目的和目标:本研究的目的是确定已使用的治疗方法,并识别以 OAS、PFS 和 DFS 形式报告生存结果的预后因素。患者和方法本研究纳入了 56 名患者,他们是在 2005 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间招募的,标准如下:已证实的非上皮性卵巢癌,所有分期,年龄大于 18 岁。所有统计分析将使用 26 版软件工具 (SPSS)(社会科学统计软件包)进行。定量数据将以中位数和最小-最大值(范围)或平均值和标准偏差进行汇总,定性数据则以百分比进行汇总。如果 P 值小于 0.05,则结果具有显著性。结果:所有 56 名患者(100%)都接受了手术:96.4%的患者进行了前期早期切除,3.6%的患者在新辅助化疗后进行了间期切除。50%的患者接受了保留生育功能手术,41.4%的患者接受了最佳切除术。78.6%的患者(44例)在手术切除后无残留病灶;12例患者有残留病灶(R1或R2)。55.4%的患者接受了化疗,其中67.7%接受了BEP方案,9名患者接受了其他方案。12名有残留病灶的患者中,病理反应75%为完全反应。中位随访 61 个月(20 至 200 个月)后,研究发现中位(OAS)随访 66 个月(22 至 201 个月)。53名患者的5年OAS率为94.6%。48名患者的中位(PFS)为66个月(15-201个月),5年PFS率为85.7%。在 44 名完全接受治疗的患者中,(DFS)为 83 个月(范围:24-201 个月),41 名患者的 5 年 DFS 率为 93.2%。(可查阅补充表格)。结论根据本研究提供的数据,通过单变量分析,表现状态、分期、手术类型和去势手术后肿瘤残留是影响患者生存的重要预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights into the Clinico-Epidemiological Aspects of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Tumor Emphasizing Diagnosis and Tailored Surgical Approach; a Single Institutional Retrospective Study
Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信