Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif
{"title":"对非上皮性卵巢肿瘤临床流行病学方面的见解,强调诊断和量身定制的手术方法;一项单一机构回顾性研究","authors":"Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif","doi":"10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .","PeriodicalId":428417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into the Clinico-Epidemiological Aspects of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Tumor Emphasizing Diagnosis and Tailored Surgical Approach; a Single Institutional Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Abdelrahman, Asmaa Eldmaty, Ahmed Elshahat, Shih Min Hsia, Rasha Abdellatif\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .\",\"PeriodicalId\":428417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer and Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jcbr.2024.265911.1337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights into the Clinico-Epidemiological Aspects of Non-Epithelial Ovarian Tumor Emphasizing Diagnosis and Tailored Surgical Approach; a Single Institutional Retrospective Study
Background: Ovarian cancers account for approximately 27% of all female tumors, with non-epithelial ovarian cell carcinoma being rare at around 10% of overall ovarian cancer cases. The aim of this study is to recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, DFS, and PFS. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is: Defining the lines of treatment have been uses and recognize the prognostic factors Reporting survival outcome in the form of OAS, PFS, and DFS. Patients and Methods: This study included fifty-six patients, who had recruited in the period between January 2005 and December 2020 with the following criteria: Proven non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma, all stages, age greater than 18 years. All statistical analyses will be performed using a software tool (SPSS) (statistical package for social sciences) version 26. Quantitative data will be summarized as medians & minimum-maximum values (range) or mean & standard deviation, while qualitative data as percentages. The results will be considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05. Results: all 56 patients (100%) underwent surgery: 96.4% had upfront early debulking, and 3.6% had interval debulking post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fertility Sparing Surgery was performed in 50%, optimal debulking in 41.4%. Surgical debulking left no residual disease in 78.6% (44 patients); 12 patients had residual disease (R1 or R2). Chemotherapy was administered to 55.4% of patients, with 67.7% receiving the BEP regimen and 9 patients receiving other regimens. Pathological responses in 12 patients with residual disease 75% achieved complete response. After a median follow-up of 61 months (20 to 200 months), the study found a median (OAS) of 66 months (22-201 months). The 5-year OAS rate was 94.6% for 53 patients. Median (PFS) was 66 months (15-201 months), with a 5-year PFS rate of 85.7% for 48 patients. Among 44 completely treated patients, (DFS) was 83 months (range: 24-201 months), with a 5-year DFS rate of 93.2% for 41 patients. (Supplementary table is available). Conclusion: According to the data presented in this study, by univariate analysis; performance status, stage, type of surgery, and tumor residual after debulking surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival .