作为早婚犯罪者法律确定性和最佳利益的一种手段,对婚姻无效请求进行法律社会学审查

Faisal Hardiansyah, Yenny Febrianti, Mahipal Mahipal
{"title":"作为早婚犯罪者法律确定性和最佳利益的一种手段,对婚姻无效请求进行法律社会学审查","authors":"Faisal Hardiansyah, Yenny Febrianti, Mahipal Mahipal","doi":"10.46799/adv.v2i3.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the process of examining marriage dispensation cases prior to and following the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Cases. This paper was written using a qualitative research method, specifically normative and empirical juridical approaches. According to the findings of this study, the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 have explicitly regulated several things that are not specifically regulated in the formal and material rules governing marriage dispensation. The adoption of this regulation is an anticipation and standardization for judges in making legal decisions, so that court decisions pay more attention to the best interests of children when granting a marriage dispensation application. \n ","PeriodicalId":517041,"journal":{"name":"Advances In Social Humanities Research","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin sebagai Sarana Kepastian Hukum dan Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Pelaku Pernikahan Usia Dini\",\"authors\":\"Faisal Hardiansyah, Yenny Febrianti, Mahipal Mahipal\",\"doi\":\"10.46799/adv.v2i3.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the process of examining marriage dispensation cases prior to and following the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Cases. This paper was written using a qualitative research method, specifically normative and empirical juridical approaches. According to the findings of this study, the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 have explicitly regulated several things that are not specifically regulated in the formal and material rules governing marriage dispensation. The adoption of this regulation is an anticipation and standardization for judges in making legal decisions, so that court decisions pay more attention to the best interests of children when granting a marriage dispensation application. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":517041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances In Social Humanities Research\",\"volume\":\"130 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances In Social Humanities Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v2i3.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances In Social Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v2i3.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了《最高法院关于婚姻调解案件裁决准则的 2019 年第 5 号条例》颁布前后的婚姻调解案件审查过程。本文采用定性研究方法,特别是规范法学和实证法学方法撰写而成。根据本研究的结果,最高法院 2019 年第 5 号条例的规定明确规范了婚姻调解的形式和实质规则中没有具体规范的若干事项。该条例的通过是对法官做出法律判决的一种预期和规范,使法院判决在批准婚姻免除申请时更加关注子女的最大利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin sebagai Sarana Kepastian Hukum dan Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Pelaku Pernikahan Usia Dini
This paper examines the process of examining marriage dispensation cases prior to and following the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Cases. This paper was written using a qualitative research method, specifically normative and empirical juridical approaches. According to the findings of this study, the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 have explicitly regulated several things that are not specifically regulated in the formal and material rules governing marriage dispensation. The adoption of this regulation is an anticipation and standardization for judges in making legal decisions, so that court decisions pay more attention to the best interests of children when granting a marriage dispensation application.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信