老年患者的类风湿性关节炎表现:与通常表现有何不同?

IF 1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rahma A. Elziaty , Aya M. Sayed , Ahmed A. Khalifa
{"title":"老年患者的类风湿性关节炎表现:与通常表现有何不同?","authors":"Rahma A. Elziaty ,&nbsp;Aya M. Sayed ,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Khalifa","doi":"10.1016/j.ejr.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim of the work</h3><p>This work aimed to compare the outcomes between elderly- and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA and YORA, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This study included 140 RA patients recruited from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study included 70 EORA (&gt;60 years) patients and a similar number of YORA (&lt;60 years) cases. Both groups were compared based on demographic data, clinical manifestations, disease activity markers, and drug history.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Large joint arthritis and myalgia were higher in the EORA group (p &lt; 0.0001) while small joint arthritis was higher in the YORA (p &lt; 0.0001). The frequency of interstitial lung disease (ILD), rheumatoid nodules, and deformities was higher in the YORA group (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02 respectively). Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were higher in YORA (p = 0.01). The disease activity scores (DAS28, SDAI, and CDAI) were higher in the YORA than in the EORA (p &lt; 0.0001). YORA were significantly receiving sulfasalazine (34.3 %) and hydroxychloroquine (84.3 %) at a higher frequency than EORA (67.1 % and 8.6 %, p &lt; 0.0001 and p = 0.02 respectively) while EORA were more receiving leflunomide (57.1 % vs 40 %; p = 0.04). Biologic therapy was received only by YORA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EORA presents with distinct features from YORA, including a more insidious onset with myalgia and large joint affection making the diagnosis more challenging. EORA has a lower severe course with less deformities and disease activity with a tendency to be controlled by a single DMARD rather than combinations or biologics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46152,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rheumatoid arthritis presentation in elderly patients: How different from the usual presentation?\",\"authors\":\"Rahma A. Elziaty ,&nbsp;Aya M. Sayed ,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Khalifa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejr.2024.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim of the work</h3><p>This work aimed to compare the outcomes between elderly- and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA and YORA, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This study included 140 RA patients recruited from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study included 70 EORA (&gt;60 years) patients and a similar number of YORA (&lt;60 years) cases. Both groups were compared based on demographic data, clinical manifestations, disease activity markers, and drug history.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Large joint arthritis and myalgia were higher in the EORA group (p &lt; 0.0001) while small joint arthritis was higher in the YORA (p &lt; 0.0001). The frequency of interstitial lung disease (ILD), rheumatoid nodules, and deformities was higher in the YORA group (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02 respectively). Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were higher in YORA (p = 0.01). The disease activity scores (DAS28, SDAI, and CDAI) were higher in the YORA than in the EORA (p &lt; 0.0001). YORA were significantly receiving sulfasalazine (34.3 %) and hydroxychloroquine (84.3 %) at a higher frequency than EORA (67.1 % and 8.6 %, p &lt; 0.0001 and p = 0.02 respectively) while EORA were more receiving leflunomide (57.1 % vs 40 %; p = 0.04). Biologic therapy was received only by YORA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EORA presents with distinct features from YORA, including a more insidious onset with myalgia and large joint affection making the diagnosis more challenging. EORA has a lower severe course with less deformities and disease activity with a tendency to be controlled by a single DMARD rather than combinations or biologics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Rheumatologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Rheumatologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Rheumatologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116424000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作目的这项工作旨在比较老年类风湿关节炎和年轻类风湿关节炎(分别为 EORA 和 YORA)的治疗效果。患者和方法这项研究包括从艾因夏姆斯大学医院风湿病门诊招募的 140 名 RA 患者。研究包括 70 名 EORA(60 岁)患者和相同数量的 YORA(60 岁)病例。两组患者的人口统计学数据、临床表现、疾病活动性指标和用药史进行了比较。结果EORA组患者的大关节炎和肌痛程度较高(p <0.0001),而YORA组患者的小关节炎程度较高(p <0.0001)。间质性肺病(ILD)、类风湿结节和畸形的发病率在 YORA 组中较高(分别为 p = 0.03、p = 0.03 和 p = 0.02)。YORA 组的抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(ACPA)阳性率和红细胞沉降率(ESR)较高(P = 0.01)。与 EORA 相比,YORA 的疾病活动评分(DAS28、SDAI 和 CDAI)更高(p = 0.0001)。青年患者接受柳氮磺胺吡啶(34.3%)和羟氯喹(84.3%)治疗的比例明显高于老年患者(分别为 67.1% 和 8.6%,p < 0.0001 和 p = 0.02),而老年患者接受来氟米特治疗的比例更高(57.1% vs 40%;p = 0.04)。结论 EORA 与 YORA 有着不同的特征,包括起病隐匿,伴有肌痛和大关节疼痛,因此诊断更具挑战性。EORA 病程较轻,畸形和疾病活动较少,倾向于通过单一 DMARD 而不是联合用药或生物制剂来控制病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rheumatoid arthritis presentation in elderly patients: How different from the usual presentation?

Aim of the work

This work aimed to compare the outcomes between elderly- and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA and YORA, respectively).

Patients and methods

This study included 140 RA patients recruited from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study included 70 EORA (>60 years) patients and a similar number of YORA (<60 years) cases. Both groups were compared based on demographic data, clinical manifestations, disease activity markers, and drug history.

Results

Large joint arthritis and myalgia were higher in the EORA group (p < 0.0001) while small joint arthritis was higher in the YORA (p < 0.0001). The frequency of interstitial lung disease (ILD), rheumatoid nodules, and deformities was higher in the YORA group (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02 respectively). Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were higher in YORA (p = 0.01). The disease activity scores (DAS28, SDAI, and CDAI) were higher in the YORA than in the EORA (p < 0.0001). YORA were significantly receiving sulfasalazine (34.3 %) and hydroxychloroquine (84.3 %) at a higher frequency than EORA (67.1 % and 8.6 %, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.02 respectively) while EORA were more receiving leflunomide (57.1 % vs 40 %; p = 0.04). Biologic therapy was received only by YORA patients.

Conclusion

EORA presents with distinct features from YORA, including a more insidious onset with myalgia and large joint affection making the diagnosis more challenging. EORA has a lower severe course with less deformities and disease activity with a tendency to be controlled by a single DMARD rather than combinations or biologics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Rheumatologist
Egyptian Rheumatologist RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信