{"title":"基于变形的盾构隧道纵向等效刚度梁模型及其在地震变形法中的应用","authors":"Pingliang Chen , Ping Geng , Junbo Chen , Qi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the longitudinal seismic deformation method for shield tunnels, one of the most commonly used is the longitudinal equivalent stiffness beam model (LES) for simulating the mechanical behavior of the lining. In this model, axial deformation and bending deformation are independent, so the equivalent stiffness is a constant value. However, the actual situation is that axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously, which is not considered in LES. At present, we are not clear about the effect on the calculation results when axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously. Therefore, in this paper, we improve the traditional LES by taking the relative deformation as a load and considering the coordinated deformation of axial and bending degrees of freedom. This improved model is called DNLES, and its neutral axis equations are an explicit expression. Then, we propose an iterative algorithm to solve the calculation model of the DNLES-based longitudinal seismic deformation method. Through a calculation example, we find that the internal forces based on LES are notably underestimated than those of DNLES in the compression bending zone, while are overestimated in the tension bending zone. When considering the combined effect, the maximum bending moment reached 13.7 times that of the LES model, and the axial pressure and tension were about 1.14 and 0.96 times, respectively. Further analysis reveals the coordinated deformation process in the axial and bending directions of the shield tunnel, which leads to a consequent change in equivalent stiffness. This explains why, in the longitudinal seismic deformation method, the traditional LES may result in unreasonable calculation results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 280-299"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000199/pdfft?md5=cc85cae18cece12a75a5b55477ce207a&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000199-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deformation-based longitudinal equivalent stiffness beam model for shield tunnel and its application in seismic deformation method\",\"authors\":\"Pingliang Chen , Ping Geng , Junbo Chen , Qi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the longitudinal seismic deformation method for shield tunnels, one of the most commonly used is the longitudinal equivalent stiffness beam model (LES) for simulating the mechanical behavior of the lining. In this model, axial deformation and bending deformation are independent, so the equivalent stiffness is a constant value. However, the actual situation is that axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously, which is not considered in LES. At present, we are not clear about the effect on the calculation results when axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously. Therefore, in this paper, we improve the traditional LES by taking the relative deformation as a load and considering the coordinated deformation of axial and bending degrees of freedom. This improved model is called DNLES, and its neutral axis equations are an explicit expression. Then, we propose an iterative algorithm to solve the calculation model of the DNLES-based longitudinal seismic deformation method. Through a calculation example, we find that the internal forces based on LES are notably underestimated than those of DNLES in the compression bending zone, while are overestimated in the tension bending zone. When considering the combined effect, the maximum bending moment reached 13.7 times that of the LES model, and the axial pressure and tension were about 1.14 and 0.96 times, respectively. Further analysis reveals the coordinated deformation process in the axial and bending directions of the shield tunnel, which leads to a consequent change in equivalent stiffness. This explains why, in the longitudinal seismic deformation method, the traditional LES may result in unreasonable calculation results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 280-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000199/pdfft?md5=cc85cae18cece12a75a5b55477ce207a&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000199-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000199\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000199","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在盾构隧道的纵向地震变形方法中,最常用的是纵向等效刚度梁模型(LES),用于模拟衬砌的力学行为。在该模型中,轴向变形和弯曲变形是独立的,因此等效刚度是一个恒定值。然而,实际情况是轴向变形和弯曲变形同时发生,而 LES 并没有考虑这一点。目前,我们还不清楚轴向变形和弯曲变形同时发生时对计算结果的影响。因此,本文改进了传统的 LES,将相对变形作为载荷,并考虑轴向和弯曲自由度的协调变形。这种改进模型被称为 DNLES,其中性轴方程为显式表达。然后,我们提出了一种迭代算法来求解基于 DNLES 的纵向地震变形方法的计算模型。通过计算实例,我们发现基于 LES 的内力在压缩弯曲区明显比基于 DNLES 的内力低估,而在拉伸弯曲区则被高估。考虑到综合效应,最大弯矩达到了 LES 模型的 13.7 倍,轴向压力和拉力分别约为 1.14 倍和 0.96 倍。进一步的分析表明,盾构隧道轴向和弯曲方向的变形过程是协调的,这导致了等效刚度的变化。这就解释了为什么在纵向地震变形方法中,传统的 LES 可能会导致不合理的计算结果。
Deformation-based longitudinal equivalent stiffness beam model for shield tunnel and its application in seismic deformation method
In the longitudinal seismic deformation method for shield tunnels, one of the most commonly used is the longitudinal equivalent stiffness beam model (LES) for simulating the mechanical behavior of the lining. In this model, axial deformation and bending deformation are independent, so the equivalent stiffness is a constant value. However, the actual situation is that axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously, which is not considered in LES. At present, we are not clear about the effect on the calculation results when axial deformation and bending deformation occur simultaneously. Therefore, in this paper, we improve the traditional LES by taking the relative deformation as a load and considering the coordinated deformation of axial and bending degrees of freedom. This improved model is called DNLES, and its neutral axis equations are an explicit expression. Then, we propose an iterative algorithm to solve the calculation model of the DNLES-based longitudinal seismic deformation method. Through a calculation example, we find that the internal forces based on LES are notably underestimated than those of DNLES in the compression bending zone, while are overestimated in the tension bending zone. When considering the combined effect, the maximum bending moment reached 13.7 times that of the LES model, and the axial pressure and tension were about 1.14 and 0.96 times, respectively. Further analysis reveals the coordinated deformation process in the axial and bending directions of the shield tunnel, which leads to a consequent change in equivalent stiffness. This explains why, in the longitudinal seismic deformation method, the traditional LES may result in unreasonable calculation results.
期刊介绍:
Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.