音乐和听觉刺激对自律神经唤醒、认知和注意力的影响:系统综述。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Zhong Jian Chee , Chern Yi Marybeth Chang , Jean Yi Cheong , Fatin Hannah Binte Abdul Malek , Shahad Hussain , Marieke de Vries , Alessio Bellato
{"title":"音乐和听觉刺激对自律神经唤醒、认知和注意力的影响:系统综述。","authors":"Zhong Jian Chee ,&nbsp;Chern Yi Marybeth Chang ,&nbsp;Jean Yi Cheong ,&nbsp;Fatin Hannah Binte Abdul Malek ,&nbsp;Shahad Hussain ,&nbsp;Marieke de Vries ,&nbsp;Alessio Bellato","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the arousal-mood hypothesis, changes in arousal and mood when exposed to auditory stimulation underlie the detrimental effects or improvements in cognitive performance. Findings supporting or against this hypothesis are, however, often based on subjective ratings of arousal rather than autonomic/physiological indices of arousal. To assess the arousal-mood hypothesis, we carried out a systematic review of the literature on 31 studies investigating cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures when exposed to different types of auditory stimulation (music, ambient noise, white noise, and binaural beats) in relation to cognitive performance. Our review suggests that the effects of music, noise, or binaural beats on cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures in relation to cognitive performance are either mixed or insufficient to draw conclusions. Importantly, the evidence for or against the arousal-mood hypothesis is at best indirect because autonomic arousal and cognitive performance are often considered separately. Future research is needed to directly evaluate the effects of auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal and cognitive performance holistically.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 112328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000321/pdfft?md5=3a90abf3b65331bd8eb745433509f1b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167876024000321-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of music and auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal, cognition and attention: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Jian Chee ,&nbsp;Chern Yi Marybeth Chang ,&nbsp;Jean Yi Cheong ,&nbsp;Fatin Hannah Binte Abdul Malek ,&nbsp;Shahad Hussain ,&nbsp;Marieke de Vries ,&nbsp;Alessio Bellato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>According to the arousal-mood hypothesis, changes in arousal and mood when exposed to auditory stimulation underlie the detrimental effects or improvements in cognitive performance. Findings supporting or against this hypothesis are, however, often based on subjective ratings of arousal rather than autonomic/physiological indices of arousal. To assess the arousal-mood hypothesis, we carried out a systematic review of the literature on 31 studies investigating cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures when exposed to different types of auditory stimulation (music, ambient noise, white noise, and binaural beats) in relation to cognitive performance. Our review suggests that the effects of music, noise, or binaural beats on cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures in relation to cognitive performance are either mixed or insufficient to draw conclusions. Importantly, the evidence for or against the arousal-mood hypothesis is at best indirect because autonomic arousal and cognitive performance are often considered separately. Future research is needed to directly evaluate the effects of auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal and cognitive performance holistically.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000321/pdfft?md5=3a90abf3b65331bd8eb745433509f1b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167876024000321-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 "唤醒-情绪假说",在受到听觉刺激时,唤醒和情绪的变化是导致认知能力下降或提高的原因。然而,支持或反对这一假说的研究结果往往基于对唤醒的主观评价,而不是唤醒的自律神经/生理指标。为了评估 "唤醒-情绪 "假说,我们对 31 项研究的文献进行了系统回顾,这些研究调查了暴露于不同类型的听觉刺激(音乐、环境噪音、白噪音和双耳节拍)时,心脏、皮电和瞳孔测量指标与认知表现的关系。我们的综述表明,音乐、噪音或双耳节拍对与认知能力相关的心电、皮电和瞳孔测量的影响不一,或不足以得出结论。重要的是,支持或反对唤醒-情绪假说的证据充其量只是间接的,因为自律神经唤醒和认知能力通常是分开考虑的。未来的研究需要直接从整体上评估听觉刺激对自律神经唤醒和认知能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of music and auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal, cognition and attention: A systematic review

According to the arousal-mood hypothesis, changes in arousal and mood when exposed to auditory stimulation underlie the detrimental effects or improvements in cognitive performance. Findings supporting or against this hypothesis are, however, often based on subjective ratings of arousal rather than autonomic/physiological indices of arousal. To assess the arousal-mood hypothesis, we carried out a systematic review of the literature on 31 studies investigating cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures when exposed to different types of auditory stimulation (music, ambient noise, white noise, and binaural beats) in relation to cognitive performance. Our review suggests that the effects of music, noise, or binaural beats on cardiac, electrodermal, and pupillometry measures in relation to cognitive performance are either mixed or insufficient to draw conclusions. Importantly, the evidence for or against the arousal-mood hypothesis is at best indirect because autonomic arousal and cognitive performance are often considered separately. Future research is needed to directly evaluate the effects of auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal and cognitive performance holistically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信