颈动脉狭窄对接受再灌注治疗的脑卒中患者预后的影响:叙述性综述。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Reviews in the Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-03-11 Print Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2024-0002
Giovanna Viticchi, Lorenzo Falsetti, Claudia Altamura, Chiara Di Felice, Fabrizio Vernieri, Marco Bartolini, Mauro Silvestrini
{"title":"颈动脉狭窄对接受再灌注治疗的脑卒中患者预后的影响:叙述性综述。","authors":"Giovanna Viticchi, Lorenzo Falsetti, Claudia Altamura, Chiara Di Felice, Fabrizio Vernieri, Marco Bartolini, Mauro Silvestrini","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2024-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous thrombolysis (IT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MD) are the two interventional approaches that have changed the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Ipsilateral and contralateral carotid stenosis (ICS, CCS) play an important role in regulating cerebral hemodynamics, both in chronic and acute situations such as AIS. Several studies have explored their role in the incidence and severity of stroke, but very few have investigated the possible impact of ICS and CCS on the efficacy of interventional procedures. The purpose of this review was to I) highlight the incidence and prevalence of carotid stenosis (CS); II) assess the impact of ICS and CCS on cerebral hemodynamics; III) evaluate the effect of carotid stenosis on the efficacy of interventional therapies (IT and MT) for AIS; and IV) report therapeutic complications related to CS. We searched PubMed/Medline for case reports, reviews, and original research articles on English-language review topics during the period from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2023. CS is associated with 15-20 % of the total number of AIS. ICS and CCS had a negative influence on both cerebral hemodynamics before AIS and outcome after interventional procedures (IT, MT alone or in bridging). Available data on cerebral hemodynamics and efficacy of interventional therapies for AIS suggest a negative role of CS. Therefore, early diagnosis of CS may be considered relevant to preventive and post-stroke treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of carotid stenosis on the outcome of stroke patients submitted to reperfusion treatments: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Viticchi, Lorenzo Falsetti, Claudia Altamura, Chiara Di Felice, Fabrizio Vernieri, Marco Bartolini, Mauro Silvestrini\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/revneuro-2024-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intravenous thrombolysis (IT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MD) are the two interventional approaches that have changed the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Ipsilateral and contralateral carotid stenosis (ICS, CCS) play an important role in regulating cerebral hemodynamics, both in chronic and acute situations such as AIS. Several studies have explored their role in the incidence and severity of stroke, but very few have investigated the possible impact of ICS and CCS on the efficacy of interventional procedures. The purpose of this review was to I) highlight the incidence and prevalence of carotid stenosis (CS); II) assess the impact of ICS and CCS on cerebral hemodynamics; III) evaluate the effect of carotid stenosis on the efficacy of interventional therapies (IT and MT) for AIS; and IV) report therapeutic complications related to CS. We searched PubMed/Medline for case reports, reviews, and original research articles on English-language review topics during the period from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2023. CS is associated with 15-20 % of the total number of AIS. ICS and CCS had a negative influence on both cerebral hemodynamics before AIS and outcome after interventional procedures (IT, MT alone or in bridging). Available data on cerebral hemodynamics and efficacy of interventional therapies for AIS suggest a negative role of CS. Therefore, early diagnosis of CS may be considered relevant to preventive and post-stroke treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in the Neurosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in the Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2024-0002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2024-0002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静脉溶栓(IT)和机械取栓(MD)是改变急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者预后的两种介入方法。同侧和对侧颈动脉狭窄(ICS,CCS)在调节脑血流动力学方面起着重要作用,无论是在慢性还是急性情况下,如 AIS。一些研究探讨了它们在中风发病率和严重程度中的作用,但很少有研究探讨 ICS 和 CCS 对介入手术疗效的可能影响。本综述旨在 I) 强调颈动脉狭窄(CS)的发病率和流行率;II) 评估 ICS 和 CCS 对脑血流动力学的影响;III) 评估颈动脉狭窄对 AIS 介入疗法(IT 和 MT)疗效的影响;IV) 报告与 CS 相关的治疗并发症。我们在 PubMed/Medline 上检索了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 1 日期间的病例报告、综述和英文综述主题的原始研究文章。AIS总数的15-20%与CCS有关。ICS和CCS对AIS前的脑血流动力学和介入手术(IT、MT单独或桥接)后的结果均有负面影响。有关 AIS 的脑血流动力学和介入疗法疗效的现有数据表明,CS 起着负面作用。因此,CS 的早期诊断可能与预防和卒中后的治疗策略有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of carotid stenosis on the outcome of stroke patients submitted to reperfusion treatments: a narrative review.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MD) are the two interventional approaches that have changed the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Ipsilateral and contralateral carotid stenosis (ICS, CCS) play an important role in regulating cerebral hemodynamics, both in chronic and acute situations such as AIS. Several studies have explored their role in the incidence and severity of stroke, but very few have investigated the possible impact of ICS and CCS on the efficacy of interventional procedures. The purpose of this review was to I) highlight the incidence and prevalence of carotid stenosis (CS); II) assess the impact of ICS and CCS on cerebral hemodynamics; III) evaluate the effect of carotid stenosis on the efficacy of interventional therapies (IT and MT) for AIS; and IV) report therapeutic complications related to CS. We searched PubMed/Medline for case reports, reviews, and original research articles on English-language review topics during the period from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2023. CS is associated with 15-20 % of the total number of AIS. ICS and CCS had a negative influence on both cerebral hemodynamics before AIS and outcome after interventional procedures (IT, MT alone or in bridging). Available data on cerebral hemodynamics and efficacy of interventional therapies for AIS suggest a negative role of CS. Therefore, early diagnosis of CS may be considered relevant to preventive and post-stroke treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Reviews in the Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信