租用者效应:租用者缺乏品牌承诺如何(以及对谁而言)削弱品牌形象

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Aaron J. Barnes, Tiffany Barnett White
{"title":"租用者效应:租用者缺乏品牌承诺如何(以及对谁而言)削弱品牌形象","authors":"Aaron J. Barnes, Tiffany Barnett White","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01006-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To compete against disruptive startups such as Rent the Runway and Zipcar, many established brands have shifted from traditional ownership business models to access business models by providing short-term rentals of existing goods. Despite their growing popularity, surprisingly little is known about how access offers affect consumer responses. The current research addresses this gap and reveals unintended consequences of introducing branded access offers. Across four experiments, the authors find that consumers whose brand attachment reflects their identity as a member of a group (e.g., those with a high group-brand connection) think that access versus traditional (ownership-based) offers more negatively impact parent brand image. This accessor effect occurs because consumers with high group-brand connections are differentially sensitive to accessors’ perceived lack of brand commitment. Consistent with our perceived commitment account, the effect can be mitigated when access offer rental periods are longer (vs. shorter).</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accessor effect: How (and for whom) renters’ lack of perceived brand commitment dilutes brand image\",\"authors\":\"Aaron J. Barnes, Tiffany Barnett White\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-024-01006-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To compete against disruptive startups such as Rent the Runway and Zipcar, many established brands have shifted from traditional ownership business models to access business models by providing short-term rentals of existing goods. Despite their growing popularity, surprisingly little is known about how access offers affect consumer responses. The current research addresses this gap and reveals unintended consequences of introducing branded access offers. Across four experiments, the authors find that consumers whose brand attachment reflects their identity as a member of a group (e.g., those with a high group-brand connection) think that access versus traditional (ownership-based) offers more negatively impact parent brand image. This accessor effect occurs because consumers with high group-brand connections are differentially sensitive to accessors’ perceived lack of brand commitment. Consistent with our perceived commitment account, the effect can be mitigated when access offer rental periods are longer (vs. shorter).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01006-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01006-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了与 Rent the Runway 和 Zipcar 等颠覆性初创企业竞争,许多知名品牌已从传统的所有权商业模式转向使用权商业模式,提供现有商品的短期租赁服务。尽管这种模式越来越受欢迎,但令人惊讶的是,人们对 "使用权 "如何影响消费者的反应知之甚少。目前的研究填补了这一空白,并揭示了引入品牌使用优惠所带来的意想不到的后果。通过四项实验,作者发现,那些对品牌的依恋反映了他们作为群体成员身份的消费者(例如,那些与群体品牌联系紧密的消费者)认为,与传统(基于所有权的)优惠相比,使用权优惠对母公司品牌形象的负面影响更大。之所以会出现这种访问者效应,是因为与群体品牌关联度高的消费者对访问者缺乏品牌承诺的感知敏感度不同。与我们的 "感知承诺 "观点一致的是,当租赁期较长(与较短)时,这种效应会得到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The accessor effect: How (and for whom) renters’ lack of perceived brand commitment dilutes brand image

The accessor effect: How (and for whom) renters’ lack of perceived brand commitment dilutes brand image

To compete against disruptive startups such as Rent the Runway and Zipcar, many established brands have shifted from traditional ownership business models to access business models by providing short-term rentals of existing goods. Despite their growing popularity, surprisingly little is known about how access offers affect consumer responses. The current research addresses this gap and reveals unintended consequences of introducing branded access offers. Across four experiments, the authors find that consumers whose brand attachment reflects their identity as a member of a group (e.g., those with a high group-brand connection) think that access versus traditional (ownership-based) offers more negatively impact parent brand image. This accessor effect occurs because consumers with high group-brand connections are differentially sensitive to accessors’ perceived lack of brand commitment. Consistent with our perceived commitment account, the effect can be mitigated when access offer rental periods are longer (vs. shorter).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信