对主要系统治疗的病理反应模式不常见

IF 0.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laia Bernet , Stella Peláez , Juan de la Camara de las Heras
{"title":"对主要系统治疗的病理反应模式不常见","authors":"Laia Bernet ,&nbsp;Stella Peláez ,&nbsp;Juan de la Camara de las Heras","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2024.100584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard treatment for high-risk breast cancer. The pathological study of post-NACT surgical specimens, always complex and still insufficiently standardised, remains the gold standard for the definitive assessment of response, the morphological patterns of which must be identified. Pathologists, therefore, must identify NACT-induced changes in both tumour cells and tumour-associated stroma, as well as in the background breast tissue. Residual tumour volume after NACT is a significant prognostic factor and different methods have been proposed to quantify it. The most commonly used are the RCB and Miller-Payne systems. Although both indices are capable of stratifying response, the RCB has greater predictive power. Neither, however, provides information on certain poorly recognised morphological response patterns that, even without residual stromal tumour, should not be considered complete pathological response and their biological significance and prognostic value are controversial. We present a case of pure lymphovascular residual tumour response, morphological characterisation, and differential diagnosis, together with the applicability of the RCB and Miller-Payne indices in these cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patrón infrecuente de respuesta patológica a la terapia sistémica primaria\",\"authors\":\"Laia Bernet ,&nbsp;Stella Peláez ,&nbsp;Juan de la Camara de las Heras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.senol.2024.100584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard treatment for high-risk breast cancer. The pathological study of post-NACT surgical specimens, always complex and still insufficiently standardised, remains the gold standard for the definitive assessment of response, the morphological patterns of which must be identified. Pathologists, therefore, must identify NACT-induced changes in both tumour cells and tumour-associated stroma, as well as in the background breast tissue. Residual tumour volume after NACT is a significant prognostic factor and different methods have been proposed to quantify it. The most commonly used are the RCB and Miller-Payne systems. Although both indices are capable of stratifying response, the RCB has greater predictive power. Neither, however, provides information on certain poorly recognised morphological response patterns that, even without residual stromal tumour, should not be considered complete pathological response and their biological significance and prognostic value are controversial. We present a case of pure lymphovascular residual tumour response, morphological characterisation, and differential diagnosis, together with the applicability of the RCB and Miller-Payne indices in these cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158224000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158224000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新辅助化疗(NACT)已成为高危乳腺癌的标准治疗方法。新辅助化疗后手术标本的病理研究一直都很复杂,而且仍不够标准化,但仍是明确评估反应的黄金标准,必须确定其形态模式。因此,病理学家必须确定 NACT 在肿瘤细胞和肿瘤相关基质以及背景乳腺组织中引起的变化。NACT 术后残留肿瘤体积是一个重要的预后因素,目前已提出了不同的量化方法。最常用的是 RCB 和 Miller-Payne 系统。虽然这两种指标都能对反应进行分层,但 RCB 的预测能力更强。但是,这两种方法都不能提供某些公认的形态学反应模式的信息,即使没有残留的间质肿瘤,也不能将其视为完全病理反应,而且它们的生物学意义和预后价值也存在争议。我们介绍了一例纯淋巴管残留肿瘤反应、形态学特征和鉴别诊断,以及 RCB 和 Miller-Payne 指数在这些病例中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patrón infrecuente de respuesta patológica a la terapia sistémica primaria

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard treatment for high-risk breast cancer. The pathological study of post-NACT surgical specimens, always complex and still insufficiently standardised, remains the gold standard for the definitive assessment of response, the morphological patterns of which must be identified. Pathologists, therefore, must identify NACT-induced changes in both tumour cells and tumour-associated stroma, as well as in the background breast tissue. Residual tumour volume after NACT is a significant prognostic factor and different methods have been proposed to quantify it. The most commonly used are the RCB and Miller-Payne systems. Although both indices are capable of stratifying response, the RCB has greater predictive power. Neither, however, provides information on certain poorly recognised morphological response patterns that, even without residual stromal tumour, should not be considered complete pathological response and their biological significance and prognostic value are controversial. We present a case of pure lymphovascular residual tumour response, morphological characterisation, and differential diagnosis, together with the applicability of the RCB and Miller-Payne indices in these cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信