超薄侧壁电极的插入结果和听力效果

Sini Sipari, Matti Iso-Mustajärv, Pia Linder, Aarno Dietz
{"title":"超薄侧壁电极的插入结果和听力效果","authors":"Sini Sipari, Matti Iso-Mustajärv, Pia Linder, Aarno Dietz","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.22962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcomes of cochlear implantation vary for several reasons. It is necessary to study the different electrodes and variables for further development. The aim of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of a new slim lateral wall electrode (SlimJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 25 cochlear implantations in 23 patients with the SlimJ electrode were retrospectively collected. The insertion results were assessed by image fusion of the preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and postoperative cone-beam CT. The hearing outcomes were evaluated by the improvement of speech recognition in noise, measured preoperatively and at follow-up. Postoperative pure-tone thresholds were obtained in cases with preoperative functional low frequency hearing [PTA (0.125-0.5 kHz) ≤ 80 dB HL].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative mean speech reception threshold (SRT) was +0.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (SD ± 4.2 dB) and the postoperative -3.5 dB SNR (SD ± 2.3 dB). The improvements between the preoperative and postoperative SRT levels ranged from 0.0 to 15.1 dB, with a mean improvement of 4.2 dB (SD ± 3.6 dB). Residual hearing in low frequencies (mean PTA(125-500 Hz)) was preserved within 30 dB HL in 70% and within 15 dB HL in 40% of patients who had preoperatively functional low frequency hearing. Mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 401° (SD ± 41°). We observed scalar translocations from scala tympani to scala vestibuli in 2 ears (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relatively atraumatic insertion characteristics make the SlimJ array feasible for hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The hearing outcomes are comparable to those reported for other electrodes and devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insertion Results and Hearing Outcomes of a Slim Lateral Wall Electrode.\",\"authors\":\"Sini Sipari, Matti Iso-Mustajärv, Pia Linder, Aarno Dietz\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/iao.2024.22962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical outcomes of cochlear implantation vary for several reasons. It is necessary to study the different electrodes and variables for further development. The aim of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of a new slim lateral wall electrode (SlimJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 25 cochlear implantations in 23 patients with the SlimJ electrode were retrospectively collected. The insertion results were assessed by image fusion of the preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and postoperative cone-beam CT. The hearing outcomes were evaluated by the improvement of speech recognition in noise, measured preoperatively and at follow-up. Postoperative pure-tone thresholds were obtained in cases with preoperative functional low frequency hearing [PTA (0.125-0.5 kHz) ≤ 80 dB HL].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative mean speech reception threshold (SRT) was +0.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (SD ± 4.2 dB) and the postoperative -3.5 dB SNR (SD ± 2.3 dB). The improvements between the preoperative and postoperative SRT levels ranged from 0.0 to 15.1 dB, with a mean improvement of 4.2 dB (SD ± 3.6 dB). Residual hearing in low frequencies (mean PTA(125-500 Hz)) was preserved within 30 dB HL in 70% and within 15 dB HL in 40% of patients who had preoperatively functional low frequency hearing. Mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 401° (SD ± 41°). We observed scalar translocations from scala tympani to scala vestibuli in 2 ears (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relatively atraumatic insertion characteristics make the SlimJ array feasible for hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The hearing outcomes are comparable to those reported for other electrodes and devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.22962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.22962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于多种原因,人工耳蜗植入术的临床效果各不相同。有必要对不同的电极和变量进行研究,以便进一步开发。本研究旨在报告新型纤细侧壁电极(SlimJ)的临床效果:方法:回顾性收集了 23 名患者使用 SlimJ 电极进行 25 次人工耳蜗植入的数据。通过术前计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和术后锥束 CT 的图像融合评估植入结果。听力结果通过术前和随访时测量的噪音中语音识别能力的改善情况进行评估。对术前低频功能性听力[PTA(0.125-0.5 kHz)≤ 80 dB HL]的病例进行术后纯音阈值测量:结果:术前平均言语接收阈值(SRT)为+0.6 dB信噪比(SNR)(SD ± 4.2 dB),术后为-3.5 dB信噪比(SD ± 2.3 dB)。术前和术后 SRT 水平的改善幅度在 0.0 至 15.1 分贝之间,平均改善幅度为 4.2 分贝(标准差 ± 3.6 分贝)。术前有低频功能性听力的患者中,70%的患者低频残余听力(平均 PTA(125-500 Hz))保持在 30 dB HL 以内,40%的患者保持在 15 dB HL 以内。平均插入深度角 (IDA) 为 401° (SD ± 41°)。我们在两只耳朵(9%)中观察到鼓室到前庭的鳞状移位:结论:SlimJ 阵列具有相对无创的植入特性,可用于听力保护人工耳蜗植入术。听力结果与其他电极和设备的听力结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insertion Results and Hearing Outcomes of a Slim Lateral Wall Electrode.

Background: The clinical outcomes of cochlear implantation vary for several reasons. It is necessary to study the different electrodes and variables for further development. The aim of this study is to report the clinical outcomes of a new slim lateral wall electrode (SlimJ).

Methods: Data of 25 cochlear implantations in 23 patients with the SlimJ electrode were retrospectively collected. The insertion results were assessed by image fusion of the preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and postoperative cone-beam CT. The hearing outcomes were evaluated by the improvement of speech recognition in noise, measured preoperatively and at follow-up. Postoperative pure-tone thresholds were obtained in cases with preoperative functional low frequency hearing [PTA (0.125-0.5 kHz) ≤ 80 dB HL].

Results: The preoperative mean speech reception threshold (SRT) was +0.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (SD ± 4.2 dB) and the postoperative -3.5 dB SNR (SD ± 2.3 dB). The improvements between the preoperative and postoperative SRT levels ranged from 0.0 to 15.1 dB, with a mean improvement of 4.2 dB (SD ± 3.6 dB). Residual hearing in low frequencies (mean PTA(125-500 Hz)) was preserved within 30 dB HL in 70% and within 15 dB HL in 40% of patients who had preoperatively functional low frequency hearing. Mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 401° (SD ± 41°). We observed scalar translocations from scala tympani to scala vestibuli in 2 ears (9%).

Conclusion: The relatively atraumatic insertion characteristics make the SlimJ array feasible for hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The hearing outcomes are comparable to those reported for other electrodes and devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信