儿童风湿病学中的生物制剂有多安全?

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Emine Nur Sunar Yayla, Çişem Yıldız, Pelin Esmeray Şenol, Nihal Karaçayır, Deniz Gezgin Yıldırım, Sevcan A Bakkaloğlu
{"title":"儿童风湿病学中的生物制剂有多安全?","authors":"Emine Nur Sunar Yayla, Çişem Yıldız, Pelin Esmeray Şenol, Nihal Karaçayır, Deniz Gezgin Yıldırım, Sevcan A Bakkaloğlu","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biologic therapy has changed the prognosis of patients with rheumatologic disease. Despite all benefits of the biological agents, adverse events may occur due to their long-term use. The aim of this study is to analyze the adverse events observed in pediatric patients who received biological treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and January 2022. File records of 139 patients used biological agents for rheumatologic diseases in a pediatric rheumatology clinic were evaluated. Diagnosis, received treatment, the rationale for stopping treatment, requirement of tuberculosis prophylaxis, presence of an adverse event, and results were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most used biological therapy was etanercept (41.7%). Anakinra, adalimumab, canakinumab were used in 30.9%, 27.3%, 23.7% of patients, and the others in less than 10%. Totally 491 adverse events (97.9/100 patient-years) were encountered during the duration of biological treatment. The most often adverse event was recurrent upper respiratory tract infection in the patients (31.9/100 patient-years). Elevated aminotransferase levels (10.4/100 patient-years), abdominal pain (7/100 patient-years), and headache (5.2/100 patient-years) were among the other common side effects. Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis was needed before biological treatment in 20.9% of the patients. Tuberculosis developed in none of the patients followed-up for latent tuberculosis, however, it developed in a patient while receiving etanercept due to noncompliance with his scheduled outpatient visits during etanercept treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most commonly used biological treatments were TNFi and IL-antagonists, and the majority of side effects were infections and laboratory abnormalities. Although the rate of serious adverse events is quite low, close follow-up of patients receiving biological therapy is very important.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?\",\"authors\":\"Emine Nur Sunar Yayla, Çişem Yıldız, Pelin Esmeray Şenol, Nihal Karaçayır, Deniz Gezgin Yıldırım, Sevcan A Bakkaloğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biologic therapy has changed the prognosis of patients with rheumatologic disease. Despite all benefits of the biological agents, adverse events may occur due to their long-term use. The aim of this study is to analyze the adverse events observed in pediatric patients who received biological treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and January 2022. File records of 139 patients used biological agents for rheumatologic diseases in a pediatric rheumatology clinic were evaluated. Diagnosis, received treatment, the rationale for stopping treatment, requirement of tuberculosis prophylaxis, presence of an adverse event, and results were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most used biological therapy was etanercept (41.7%). Anakinra, adalimumab, canakinumab were used in 30.9%, 27.3%, 23.7% of patients, and the others in less than 10%. Totally 491 adverse events (97.9/100 patient-years) were encountered during the duration of biological treatment. The most often adverse event was recurrent upper respiratory tract infection in the patients (31.9/100 patient-years). Elevated aminotransferase levels (10.4/100 patient-years), abdominal pain (7/100 patient-years), and headache (5.2/100 patient-years) were among the other common side effects. Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis was needed before biological treatment in 20.9% of the patients. Tuberculosis developed in none of the patients followed-up for latent tuberculosis, however, it developed in a patient while receiving etanercept due to noncompliance with his scheduled outpatient visits during etanercept treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most commonly used biological treatments were TNFi and IL-antagonists, and the majority of side effects were infections and laboratory abnormalities. Although the rate of serious adverse events is quite low, close follow-up of patients receiving biological therapy is very important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:生物疗法改变了风湿病患者的预后:生物疗法改变了风湿病患者的预后。尽管生物制剂有诸多益处,但长期使用可能会出现不良反应。本研究旨在分析在接受生物制剂治疗的儿童患者中观察到的不良事件:这项回顾性观察队列研究在 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间进行。研究评估了儿科风湿病诊所中使用生物制剂治疗风湿病的 139 名患者的档案记录。研究记录了诊断、接受的治疗、停止治疗的理由、预防结核病的要求、不良事件的发生以及治疗结果:结果:最常用的生物疗法是依那西普(etanercept,41.7%)。30.9%、27.3%和23.7%的患者使用了阿纳金拉、阿达木单抗和卡纳库单抗,其他药物的使用率低于10%。在生物治疗期间,共发生了 491 例不良事件(97.9/100 患者年)。最常见的不良反应是患者反复出现上呼吸道感染(31.9/100 患者年)。其他常见的副作用包括转氨酶水平升高(10.4/100 病人年)、腹痛(7/100 病人年)和头痛(5.2/100 病人年)。20.9%的患者在接受生物治疗前需要进行异烟肼(INH)预防。在因潜伏肺结核而接受随访的患者中,没有人出现肺结核,但有一名患者在接受依那西普治疗期间,因未遵守依那西普治疗期间的门诊安排而出现肺结核:结论:最常用的生物治疗方法是 TNFi 和 IL-拮抗剂,副作用主要是感染和实验室异常。虽然严重不良事件的发生率很低,但对接受生物疗法的患者进行密切随访非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?

Objective: Biologic therapy has changed the prognosis of patients with rheumatologic disease. Despite all benefits of the biological agents, adverse events may occur due to their long-term use. The aim of this study is to analyze the adverse events observed in pediatric patients who received biological treatment.

Materials and methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and January 2022. File records of 139 patients used biological agents for rheumatologic diseases in a pediatric rheumatology clinic were evaluated. Diagnosis, received treatment, the rationale for stopping treatment, requirement of tuberculosis prophylaxis, presence of an adverse event, and results were recorded.

Results: The most used biological therapy was etanercept (41.7%). Anakinra, adalimumab, canakinumab were used in 30.9%, 27.3%, 23.7% of patients, and the others in less than 10%. Totally 491 adverse events (97.9/100 patient-years) were encountered during the duration of biological treatment. The most often adverse event was recurrent upper respiratory tract infection in the patients (31.9/100 patient-years). Elevated aminotransferase levels (10.4/100 patient-years), abdominal pain (7/100 patient-years), and headache (5.2/100 patient-years) were among the other common side effects. Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis was needed before biological treatment in 20.9% of the patients. Tuberculosis developed in none of the patients followed-up for latent tuberculosis, however, it developed in a patient while receiving etanercept due to noncompliance with his scheduled outpatient visits during etanercept treatment.

Conclusion: The most commonly used biological treatments were TNFi and IL-antagonists, and the majority of side effects were infections and laboratory abnormalities. Although the rate of serious adverse events is quite low, close follow-up of patients receiving biological therapy is very important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信