{"title":"威廉-詹姆斯演讲《宗教经验的多样性》的经历:从历史背景看他在吉福德的表演。","authors":"John R Snarey, Joel McLendon","doi":"10.1037/hop0000255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>William James delivered the prestigious Gifford Lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1901 and 1902, and his 20 lectures were published as <i>The Varieties of Religious Experience</i>. While the book is a classic in the psychology of religion, little to no attention has been given to the immediate context of James's lectures or his state of mind and perspectives during his delivery of each. This study aimed to understand James's 20 Gifford Lectures as separable performances and to uncover his experience of delivering each. We placed in conversation two first-hand accounts of the lectures-<i>The Scotsman</i> newspaper reports and James's correspondence. A word-count methodology was used to compare the newspaper reports among themselves. The results showed that the separate reports by James and <i>The Scotsman</i> were strongly correlated. For instance, both James and <i>The Scotsman</i> reported that the 1901 lectures were better received than the 1902 lectures. Further, both confirm that James and his audience engaged each other in a complicated dance involving competing expectations and worldviews. The results demonstrate that viewing the lectures as performance events experienced by James within personal and societal historical contexts clarifies our understanding of James, each of his 20 lectures, and the book that enshrined them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":51852,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William James's experience of presenting The Varieties of Religious Experience: His Gifford performance in historical context.\",\"authors\":\"John R Snarey, Joel McLendon\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hop0000255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>William James delivered the prestigious Gifford Lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1901 and 1902, and his 20 lectures were published as <i>The Varieties of Religious Experience</i>. While the book is a classic in the psychology of religion, little to no attention has been given to the immediate context of James's lectures or his state of mind and perspectives during his delivery of each. This study aimed to understand James's 20 Gifford Lectures as separable performances and to uncover his experience of delivering each. We placed in conversation two first-hand accounts of the lectures-<i>The Scotsman</i> newspaper reports and James's correspondence. A word-count methodology was used to compare the newspaper reports among themselves. The results showed that the separate reports by James and <i>The Scotsman</i> were strongly correlated. For instance, both James and <i>The Scotsman</i> reported that the 1901 lectures were better received than the 1902 lectures. Further, both confirm that James and his audience engaged each other in a complicated dance involving competing expectations and worldviews. The results demonstrate that viewing the lectures as performance events experienced by James within personal and societal historical contexts clarifies our understanding of James, each of his 20 lectures, and the book that enshrined them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
威廉-詹姆斯于 1901 年和 1902 年在爱丁堡大学发表了著名的吉福德演讲,他的 20 篇演讲被出版为《宗教经验的多样性》。虽然该书是宗教心理学的经典之作,但很少有人关注詹姆斯演讲的直接背景或他在每次演讲时的心态和观点。本研究旨在将詹姆斯的 20 场吉福德演讲理解为可分离的表演,并揭示他在每场演讲中的经历。我们将两份关于讲座的第一手资料--《苏格兰人报》的报道和詹姆斯的书信--放在一起进行对话。我们采用字数统计的方法对报纸报道进行了比较。结果表明,詹姆斯和《苏格兰人报》的不同报道之间有很强的相关性。例如,詹姆斯和《苏格兰人报》都报道说,1901 年的讲座比 1902 年的讲座更受欢迎。此外,这两份报告都证实,詹姆斯和他的听众在相互竞争的期望和世界观中进行了复杂的互动。研究结果表明,将这些演讲视为詹姆斯在个人和社会历史背景下经历的表演事件,可以澄清我们对詹姆斯、他的 20 场演讲中的每一场以及记载这些演讲的书的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
William James's experience of presenting The Varieties of Religious Experience: His Gifford performance in historical context.
William James delivered the prestigious Gifford Lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1901 and 1902, and his 20 lectures were published as The Varieties of Religious Experience. While the book is a classic in the psychology of religion, little to no attention has been given to the immediate context of James's lectures or his state of mind and perspectives during his delivery of each. This study aimed to understand James's 20 Gifford Lectures as separable performances and to uncover his experience of delivering each. We placed in conversation two first-hand accounts of the lectures-The Scotsman newspaper reports and James's correspondence. A word-count methodology was used to compare the newspaper reports among themselves. The results showed that the separate reports by James and The Scotsman were strongly correlated. For instance, both James and The Scotsman reported that the 1901 lectures were better received than the 1902 lectures. Further, both confirm that James and his audience engaged each other in a complicated dance involving competing expectations and worldviews. The results demonstrate that viewing the lectures as performance events experienced by James within personal and societal historical contexts clarifies our understanding of James, each of his 20 lectures, and the book that enshrined them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
History of Psychology features refereed articles addressing all aspects of psychology"s past and of its interrelationship with the many contexts within which it has emerged and has been practiced. It also publishes scholarly work in closely related areas, such as historical psychology (the history of consciousness and behavior), psychohistory, theory in psychology as it pertains to history, historiography, biography and autobiography, and the teaching of the history of psychology.