40 灰分 5 次用于曾接受过立体定向体放射治疗的脊柱病变的挽救性再放射治疗。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002889
Assaf Moore, Zhigang Zhang, Teng Fei, Lei Zhang, Laura Accomando, Adam M Schmitt, Daniel S Higginson, Boris A Mueller, Melissa Zinovoy, Daphna Y Gelblum, Divya Yerramilli, Amy J Xu, Victoria S Brennan, David M Guttmann, Craig E Grossman, Laura L Dover, Narek Shaverdian, Luke R G Pike, John J Cuaron, Alexandra Dreyfuss, Eric Lis, Ori Barzilai, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada
{"title":"40 灰分 5 次用于曾接受过立体定向体放射治疗的脊柱病变的挽救性再放射治疗。","authors":"Assaf Moore, Zhigang Zhang, Teng Fei, Lei Zhang, Laura Accomando, Adam M Schmitt, Daniel S Higginson, Boris A Mueller, Melissa Zinovoy, Daphna Y Gelblum, Divya Yerramilli, Amy J Xu, Victoria S Brennan, David M Guttmann, Craig E Grossman, Laura L Dover, Narek Shaverdian, Luke R G Pike, John J Cuaron, Alexandra Dreyfuss, Eric Lis, Ori Barzilai, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000002889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of reirradiation to 40 Gy in 5 fractions (reSBRT) in patients previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to the spine was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 102 consecutive patients treated with reSBRT for 105 lesions between 3/2013 and 8/2021. Sixty-three patients (61.8%) were treated to the same vertebral level, and 39 (38.2%) to overlapping immediately adjacent levels. Local control was defined as the absence of progression within the treated target volume. The probability of local progression was estimated using a cumulative incidence curve. Death without local progression was considered a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients had extensive metastatic disease (54.9%) and were treated to the thoracic spine (53.8%). The most common regimen in the first course of stereotactic body radiotherapy was 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and the median time to reSBRT was 16.4 months. At the time of simulation, 44% of lesions had advanced epidural disease. Accordingly, 80% had myelogram simulations. Both the vertebral body and posterior elements were treated in 86% of lesions. At a median follow-up time of 13.2 months, local failure occurred in 10 lesions (9.5%). The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of local failure were 4.8% and 6%, respectively. Seven patients developed radiation-related neuropathy, and 1 patient developed myelopathy. The vertebral compression fracture rate was 16.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with extensive disease involvement, reSBRT of spine metastases with 40 Gy in 5 fractions seems to be safe and effective. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and fractionation in this clinical scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"40 Gray in 5 Fractions for Salvage Reirradiation of Spine Lesions Previously Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Assaf Moore, Zhigang Zhang, Teng Fei, Lei Zhang, Laura Accomando, Adam M Schmitt, Daniel S Higginson, Boris A Mueller, Melissa Zinovoy, Daphna Y Gelblum, Divya Yerramilli, Amy J Xu, Victoria S Brennan, David M Guttmann, Craig E Grossman, Laura L Dover, Narek Shaverdian, Luke R G Pike, John J Cuaron, Alexandra Dreyfuss, Eric Lis, Ori Barzilai, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000002889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of reirradiation to 40 Gy in 5 fractions (reSBRT) in patients previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to the spine was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 102 consecutive patients treated with reSBRT for 105 lesions between 3/2013 and 8/2021. Sixty-three patients (61.8%) were treated to the same vertebral level, and 39 (38.2%) to overlapping immediately adjacent levels. Local control was defined as the absence of progression within the treated target volume. The probability of local progression was estimated using a cumulative incidence curve. Death without local progression was considered a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients had extensive metastatic disease (54.9%) and were treated to the thoracic spine (53.8%). The most common regimen in the first course of stereotactic body radiotherapy was 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and the median time to reSBRT was 16.4 months. At the time of simulation, 44% of lesions had advanced epidural disease. Accordingly, 80% had myelogram simulations. Both the vertebral body and posterior elements were treated in 86% of lesions. At a median follow-up time of 13.2 months, local failure occurred in 10 lesions (9.5%). The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of local failure were 4.8% and 6%, respectively. Seven patients developed radiation-related neuropathy, and 1 patient developed myelopathy. The vertebral compression fracture rate was 16.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with extensive disease involvement, reSBRT of spine metastases with 40 Gy in 5 fractions seems to be safe and effective. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and fractionation in this clinical scenario.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002889\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们对曾接受过脊柱立体定向体放射治疗的患者进行5次分割40 Gy再照射(reSBRT)的安全性和有效性进行了一项回顾性单中心分析:我们确定了2013年3月至2021年8月期间接受再SBRT治疗的105例病变的102例连续患者。63名患者(61.8%)在同一椎体水平接受了治疗,39名患者(38.2%)在紧邻的重叠水平接受了治疗。局部控制被定义为治疗目标范围内无进展。局部进展的概率采用累积发病率曲线进行估算。无局部进展的死亡被视为竞争风险:大多数患者患有广泛转移性疾病(54.9%),并接受了胸椎治疗(53.8%)。首个立体定向体放射治疗疗程中最常见的治疗方案是27 Gy,分3次进行,再次接受立体定向体放射治疗的中位时间为16.4个月。在模拟时,44%的病灶有晚期硬膜外疾病。因此,80%的患者进行了脊髓造影模拟。86%的病灶椎体和后部均接受了治疗。中位随访时间为 13.2 个月,10 例病变(9.5%)出现局部失败。6个月和12个月的局部失败累积发生率分别为4.8%和6%。7名患者出现放射相关神经病变,1名患者出现脊髓病变。椎体压缩性骨折发生率为16.7%:结论:在疾病广泛累及的患者中,对脊柱转移灶进行5次分次40 Gy的再SBRT治疗似乎是安全有效的。需要进行前瞻性试验,以确定这种临床情况下的最佳剂量和分次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
40 Gray in 5 Fractions for Salvage Reirradiation of Spine Lesions Previously Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Background and purpose: A retrospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of reirradiation to 40 Gy in 5 fractions (reSBRT) in patients previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy to the spine was performed.

Methods: We identified 102 consecutive patients treated with reSBRT for 105 lesions between 3/2013 and 8/2021. Sixty-three patients (61.8%) were treated to the same vertebral level, and 39 (38.2%) to overlapping immediately adjacent levels. Local control was defined as the absence of progression within the treated target volume. The probability of local progression was estimated using a cumulative incidence curve. Death without local progression was considered a competing risk.

Results: Most patients had extensive metastatic disease (54.9%) and were treated to the thoracic spine (53.8%). The most common regimen in the first course of stereotactic body radiotherapy was 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and the median time to reSBRT was 16.4 months. At the time of simulation, 44% of lesions had advanced epidural disease. Accordingly, 80% had myelogram simulations. Both the vertebral body and posterior elements were treated in 86% of lesions. At a median follow-up time of 13.2 months, local failure occurred in 10 lesions (9.5%). The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of local failure were 4.8% and 6%, respectively. Seven patients developed radiation-related neuropathy, and 1 patient developed myelopathy. The vertebral compression fracture rate was 16.7%.

Conclusion: In patients with extensive disease involvement, reSBRT of spine metastases with 40 Gy in 5 fractions seems to be safe and effective. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and fractionation in this clinical scenario.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信