将攻击性创伤与危险行为联系起来的情绪反应性:顺性别女性与男性之间存在差异的证据。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anna Stumps, Nadia Bounoua, Naomi Sadeh
{"title":"将攻击性创伤与危险行为联系起来的情绪反应性:顺性别女性与男性之间存在差异的证据。","authors":"Anna Stumps,&nbsp;Nadia Bounoua,&nbsp;Naomi Sadeh","doi":"10.1002/jts.23028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accumulating evidence suggests that trauma exposure is positively associated with future engagement in risky behavior, such as substance misuse, aggression, risky sex, and self-harm. However, the psychological factors driving this association and their relevance across gender groups require further clarification. In a community sample of 375 adults with a high rate of trauma exposure (age range: 18–55 years, <i>M =</i> 32.98 years, <i>SD</i> = 10.64; 76.3% assaultive trauma exposure), we examined whether emotional reactivity linked lifetime assaultive trauma exposure with past–month risky behavior. We also explored whether this model differed for cisgender women (<i>n</i> = 178, 47.6%) and men (<i>n =</i> 197, 52.5%). As hypothesized, assaultive trauma was positively related to emotional reactivity, β = .20, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, <i>t</i>(369) = 3.65, <i>p</i> &lt; .001, which, in turn, partially accounted for the association between assaultive trauma and past-month risky behavior, indirect effect: β = .03, <i>SE</i> = 0.01, 95% bootstrapped CI [0.01, 0.06]. Gender moderated this association such that assaultive trauma was indirectly associated with risky behavior via emotional reactivity for women but not for men, index moderation: <i>B</i> = -0.03, <i>SE</i> = 0.02, 95% bootstrapped CI [-0.07, -0.01]. Cross-sectional results suggest that emotional reactivity may be a proximal target for clinical intervention to aid in the reduction of risky behavior among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"37 3","pages":"492-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional reactivity linking assaultive trauma and risky behavior: Evidence of differences between cisgender women and men\",\"authors\":\"Anna Stumps,&nbsp;Nadia Bounoua,&nbsp;Naomi Sadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.23028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accumulating evidence suggests that trauma exposure is positively associated with future engagement in risky behavior, such as substance misuse, aggression, risky sex, and self-harm. However, the psychological factors driving this association and their relevance across gender groups require further clarification. In a community sample of 375 adults with a high rate of trauma exposure (age range: 18–55 years, <i>M =</i> 32.98 years, <i>SD</i> = 10.64; 76.3% assaultive trauma exposure), we examined whether emotional reactivity linked lifetime assaultive trauma exposure with past–month risky behavior. We also explored whether this model differed for cisgender women (<i>n</i> = 178, 47.6%) and men (<i>n =</i> 197, 52.5%). As hypothesized, assaultive trauma was positively related to emotional reactivity, β = .20, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, <i>t</i>(369) = 3.65, <i>p</i> &lt; .001, which, in turn, partially accounted for the association between assaultive trauma and past-month risky behavior, indirect effect: β = .03, <i>SE</i> = 0.01, 95% bootstrapped CI [0.01, 0.06]. Gender moderated this association such that assaultive trauma was indirectly associated with risky behavior via emotional reactivity for women but not for men, index moderation: <i>B</i> = -0.03, <i>SE</i> = 0.02, 95% bootstrapped CI [-0.07, -0.01]. Cross-sectional results suggest that emotional reactivity may be a proximal target for clinical intervention to aid in the reduction of risky behavior among women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"492-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts.23028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,遭受心理创伤与未来的危险行为(如药物滥用、攻击、危险性行为和自残)呈正相关。然而,导致这种关联的心理因素及其在不同性别群体中的相关性还需要进一步澄清。在一个社区样本中,有 375 名成年人有较高的精神创伤暴露率(年龄范围:18-55 岁,中=32.5%,高=35.5%):年龄范围:18-55 岁,中位数 = 32.98 岁,标准差 = 10.64;76.3% 曾遭受攻击性创伤),我们研究了情绪反应性是否将终生遭受攻击性创伤与过去一个月的危险行为联系起来。我们还探讨了这一模型在顺性别女性(n = 178,47.6%)和男性(n = 197,52.5%)中是否存在差异。正如假设的那样,攻击性创伤与情绪反应性呈正相关,β = .20, SE = 0.03, t(369) = 3.65, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional reactivity linking assaultive trauma and risky behavior: Evidence of differences between cisgender women and men

Accumulating evidence suggests that trauma exposure is positively associated with future engagement in risky behavior, such as substance misuse, aggression, risky sex, and self-harm. However, the psychological factors driving this association and their relevance across gender groups require further clarification. In a community sample of 375 adults with a high rate of trauma exposure (age range: 18–55 years, M = 32.98 years, SD = 10.64; 76.3% assaultive trauma exposure), we examined whether emotional reactivity linked lifetime assaultive trauma exposure with past–month risky behavior. We also explored whether this model differed for cisgender women (n = 178, 47.6%) and men (n = 197, 52.5%). As hypothesized, assaultive trauma was positively related to emotional reactivity, β = .20, SE = 0.03, t(369) = 3.65, p < .001, which, in turn, partially accounted for the association between assaultive trauma and past-month risky behavior, indirect effect: β = .03, SE = 0.01, 95% bootstrapped CI [0.01, 0.06]. Gender moderated this association such that assaultive trauma was indirectly associated with risky behavior via emotional reactivity for women but not for men, index moderation: B = -0.03, SE = 0.02, 95% bootstrapped CI [-0.07, -0.01]. Cross-sectional results suggest that emotional reactivity may be a proximal target for clinical intervention to aid in the reduction of risky behavior among women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信