奥地利家庭分娩和助产士主导单元分娩转院后的产科和新生儿结局。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-03-06 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2249-7228
Barbara Schildberger, Marina Riedmann, Hermann Leitner, Patrick Stelzl
{"title":"奥地利家庭分娩和助产士主导单元分娩转院后的产科和新生儿结局。","authors":"Barbara Schildberger, Marina Riedmann, Hermann Leitner, Patrick Stelzl","doi":"10.1055/a-2249-7228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home births and births in midwife-led units and the associated potential risks are still being debated. An analysis of the quality of results of planned home births and births in midwife-led units which require intrapartum transfer of the mother to hospital provides important information on the quality of processes during births which occur outside hospital settings. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal and maternal outcomes after the initial plan to deliver at home or in a midwife-led unit had to be abandoned and the mother transferred to hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The method used was an analysis of data obtained from the Austrian Birth Registry. The dataset consisted of singleton term pregnancies delivered in the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 286056). For the analysis, two groups were created for comparison (planned hospital births and hospital births recorded in the Registry as births originally planned as home births or births in midwife-led units but which required a transfer to hospital) and assessed with regard to previously defined variables. Data were analyzed using frequency description, bivariate analysis and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Austria, an average of 19% of planned home births have to be discontinued and the mother transferred to hospital. Home births and births in midwife-led units which require transfer of the mother to hospital are associated with higher intervention rates intrapartum, high rates of vacuum delivery, and higher emergency c-section rates compared to planned hospital births. Multifactorial regression analysis showed significantly higher risks of poorer scores for all neonatal outcome parameters (Apgar score, pH value, transfer rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If a birth which was planned as a home delivery or as a delivery in a midwife-led unit fails to progress because of (possible) anomalies, the midwife must respond and transfer the mother to hospital. This leads to a higher percentage of clinical interventions occurring in hospital. From the perspective of clinical obstetrics, it is understandable, based on the existing data, that giving birth outside a clinical setting cannot be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"84 3","pages":"264-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Following Hospital Transfers of Home Births and Births in Midwife-led Units in Austria.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Schildberger, Marina Riedmann, Hermann Leitner, Patrick Stelzl\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2249-7228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home births and births in midwife-led units and the associated potential risks are still being debated. An analysis of the quality of results of planned home births and births in midwife-led units which require intrapartum transfer of the mother to hospital provides important information on the quality of processes during births which occur outside hospital settings. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal and maternal outcomes after the initial plan to deliver at home or in a midwife-led unit had to be abandoned and the mother transferred to hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The method used was an analysis of data obtained from the Austrian Birth Registry. The dataset consisted of singleton term pregnancies delivered in the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 286056). For the analysis, two groups were created for comparison (planned hospital births and hospital births recorded in the Registry as births originally planned as home births or births in midwife-led units but which required a transfer to hospital) and assessed with regard to previously defined variables. Data were analyzed using frequency description, bivariate analysis and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Austria, an average of 19% of planned home births have to be discontinued and the mother transferred to hospital. Home births and births in midwife-led units which require transfer of the mother to hospital are associated with higher intervention rates intrapartum, high rates of vacuum delivery, and higher emergency c-section rates compared to planned hospital births. Multifactorial regression analysis showed significantly higher risks of poorer scores for all neonatal outcome parameters (Apgar score, pH value, transfer rate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If a birth which was planned as a home delivery or as a delivery in a midwife-led unit fails to progress because of (possible) anomalies, the midwife must respond and transfer the mother to hospital. This leads to a higher percentage of clinical interventions occurring in hospital. From the perspective of clinical obstetrics, it is understandable, based on the existing data, that giving birth outside a clinical setting cannot be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"264-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2249-7228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2249-7228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在家分娩和在助产士主导的产房分娩以及相关的潜在风险仍在争论之中。对计划中的在家分娩和助产士主导的产房分娩的结果质量进行分析,为了解医院外分娩过程的质量提供了重要信息。本研究的目的是分析最初计划在家中或助产士主导的单位分娩而不得不放弃并将产妇转院后新生儿和产妇的结局:采用的方法是分析从奥地利出生登记处获得的数据。数据集包括 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间分娩的单胎足月妊娠(n = 286056)。为了进行分析,我们创建了两组进行比较(计划住院分娩和登记册中记录的住院分娩,即原计划在家分娩或在助产士主导的单位分娩但需要转院的分娩),并根据之前定义的变量进行评估。数据分析采用频率描述、双变量分析和回归模型:结果:在奥地利,平均有 19% 的计划内家庭分娩必须中止,产妇必须转院。与计划中的医院分娩相比,需要将产妇转院的家庭分娩和助产士主导的助产单位分娩与较高的产中干预率、较高的真空产率和较高的紧急剖腹产率有关。多因素回归分析显示,所有新生儿结局参数(Apgar 评分、pH 值、转院率)得分较低的风险都明显较高:结论:如果计划在家中分娩或在助产士领导的单位分娩的产妇因(可能的)异常情况而无法继续分娩,助产士必须做出反应并将产妇转院。这导致在医院进行临床干预的比例较高。从临床产科的角度来看,根据现有数据,不建议在临床环境外分娩是可以理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Following Hospital Transfers of Home Births and Births in Midwife-led Units in Austria.

Introduction: Home births and births in midwife-led units and the associated potential risks are still being debated. An analysis of the quality of results of planned home births and births in midwife-led units which require intrapartum transfer of the mother to hospital provides important information on the quality of processes during births which occur outside hospital settings. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal and maternal outcomes after the initial plan to deliver at home or in a midwife-led unit had to be abandoned and the mother transferred to hospital.

Material and methods: The method used was an analysis of data obtained from the Austrian Birth Registry. The dataset consisted of singleton term pregnancies delivered in the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 286056). For the analysis, two groups were created for comparison (planned hospital births and hospital births recorded in the Registry as births originally planned as home births or births in midwife-led units but which required a transfer to hospital) and assessed with regard to previously defined variables. Data were analyzed using frequency description, bivariate analysis and regression models.

Results: In Austria, an average of 19% of planned home births have to be discontinued and the mother transferred to hospital. Home births and births in midwife-led units which require transfer of the mother to hospital are associated with higher intervention rates intrapartum, high rates of vacuum delivery, and higher emergency c-section rates compared to planned hospital births. Multifactorial regression analysis showed significantly higher risks of poorer scores for all neonatal outcome parameters (Apgar score, pH value, transfer rate).

Conclusion: If a birth which was planned as a home delivery or as a delivery in a midwife-led unit fails to progress because of (possible) anomalies, the midwife must respond and transfer the mother to hospital. This leads to a higher percentage of clinical interventions occurring in hospital. From the perspective of clinical obstetrics, it is understandable, based on the existing data, that giving birth outside a clinical setting cannot be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信