Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu
{"title":"胃肠胰神经内分泌癌的分子特征:与肺神经内分泌癌和消化道腺癌的比较分析。","authors":"Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, <i>KRAS</i>, <i>RB1</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>IL7R</i>, and <i>CTNNB1</i> were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( <i>TERT</i> amplification), colorectal NEC ( <i>KRAS</i> mutation), and bile tract NEC ( <i>ARID1A</i> mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were <i>KEAP1</i> and <i>CDH1</i>. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested <i>RB1</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>KRAS</i> as significant genes. The <i>TP53</i>/ <i>RB1</i> mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months <i>vs.</i> 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas.\",\"authors\":\"Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, <i>KRAS</i>, <i>RB1</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>IL7R</i>, and <i>CTNNB1</i> were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( <i>TERT</i> amplification), colorectal NEC ( <i>KRAS</i> mutation), and bile tract NEC ( <i>ARID1A</i> mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were <i>KEAP1</i> and <i>CDH1</i>. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested <i>RB1</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>KRAS</i> as significant genes. The <i>TP53</i>/ <i>RB1</i> mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months <i>vs.</i> 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"90-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas.
Objective: There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.
Methods: We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.
Results: We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, KRAS, RB1, TERT, IL7R, and CTNNB1 were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( TERT amplification), colorectal NEC ( KRAS mutation), and bile tract NEC ( ARID1A mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were KEAP1 and CDH1. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested RB1, APC, and KRAS as significant genes. The TP53/ RB1 mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months vs. 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].
Conclusions: This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013.
CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.