业务天气预报验证和评估面临的挑战

IF 6.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Thomas C. Pagano, Barbara Casati, Stephanie Landman, Nicholas Loveday, Robert Taggart, Elizabeth E. Ebert, Mohammadreza Khanarmuei, Tara L. Jensen, Marion Mittermaier, Helen Roberts, Steve Willington, Nigel Roberts, Mike Sowko, Gordon Strassberg, Charles Kluepfel, Timothy A. Bullock, David D. Turner, Florian Pappenberger, Neal Osborne, Chris Noble
{"title":"业务天气预报验证和评估面临的挑战","authors":"Thomas C. Pagano, Barbara Casati, Stephanie Landman, Nicholas Loveday, Robert Taggart, Elizabeth E. Ebert, Mohammadreza Khanarmuei, Tara L. Jensen, Marion Mittermaier, Helen Roberts, Steve Willington, Nigel Roberts, Mike Sowko, Gordon Strassberg, Charles Kluepfel, Timothy A. Bullock, David D. Turner, Florian Pappenberger, Neal Osborne, Chris Noble","doi":"10.1175/bams-d-22-0257.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Operational agencies face significant challenges related to the verification and evaluation of weather forecasts. These challenges were investigated in a series of online workshops and polls engaging operational personnel from six countries. Five key themes emerged: inadequate verification approaches for both existing and emerging products; incomplete and uncertain observations; difficulties in accurately capturing users' real-world experiences using simplified metrics; poor communication and understanding of forecasts and complex verification information; and institutional factors such as limited resources, evolving meteorologist roles, and concerns over reputational damage. We identify nearly fifty operationally relevant scientific questions and suggest calls to action. Addressing these needs includes designing forecast systems with verification as a central consideration, enhancing the availability of observations, and developing and adopting community software systems. Additionally, we propose the establishment of an international community comprising environmental and social science researchers, statisticians, verification practitioners, and users to provide sustained support for this collective endeavor.","PeriodicalId":9464,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","volume":"293 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges of Operational Weather Forecast Verification and Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Thomas C. Pagano, Barbara Casati, Stephanie Landman, Nicholas Loveday, Robert Taggart, Elizabeth E. Ebert, Mohammadreza Khanarmuei, Tara L. Jensen, Marion Mittermaier, Helen Roberts, Steve Willington, Nigel Roberts, Mike Sowko, Gordon Strassberg, Charles Kluepfel, Timothy A. Bullock, David D. Turner, Florian Pappenberger, Neal Osborne, Chris Noble\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/bams-d-22-0257.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Operational agencies face significant challenges related to the verification and evaluation of weather forecasts. These challenges were investigated in a series of online workshops and polls engaging operational personnel from six countries. Five key themes emerged: inadequate verification approaches for both existing and emerging products; incomplete and uncertain observations; difficulties in accurately capturing users' real-world experiences using simplified metrics; poor communication and understanding of forecasts and complex verification information; and institutional factors such as limited resources, evolving meteorologist roles, and concerns over reputational damage. We identify nearly fifty operationally relevant scientific questions and suggest calls to action. Addressing these needs includes designing forecast systems with verification as a central consideration, enhancing the availability of observations, and developing and adopting community software systems. Additionally, we propose the establishment of an international community comprising environmental and social science researchers, statisticians, verification practitioners, and users to provide sustained support for this collective endeavor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\"293 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-22-0257.1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-22-0257.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 业务机构在核实和评估天气预报方面面临重大挑战。来自六个国家的业务人员参加了一系列在线研讨会和民意调查,对这些挑战进行了调查。我们发现了五个关键主题:现有产品和新兴产品的验证方法不足;观测数据不完整、不确定;使用简化指标难以准确捕捉用户的真实体验;对预报和复杂验证信息的沟通和理解不足;以及资源有限、气象学家角色不断变化和担心名誉受损等制度性因素。我们提出了近五十个与业务相关的科学问题,并建议采取行动。满足这些需求包括设计以验证为核心考虑的预报系统、提高观测资料的可用性以及开发和采用社区软件系统。此外,我们建议建立一个由环境和社会科学研究人员、统计学家、验证实践者和用户组成的国际社区,为这一集体努力提供持续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges of Operational Weather Forecast Verification and Evaluation
Abstract Operational agencies face significant challenges related to the verification and evaluation of weather forecasts. These challenges were investigated in a series of online workshops and polls engaging operational personnel from six countries. Five key themes emerged: inadequate verification approaches for both existing and emerging products; incomplete and uncertain observations; difficulties in accurately capturing users' real-world experiences using simplified metrics; poor communication and understanding of forecasts and complex verification information; and institutional factors such as limited resources, evolving meteorologist roles, and concerns over reputational damage. We identify nearly fifty operationally relevant scientific questions and suggest calls to action. Addressing these needs includes designing forecast systems with verification as a central consideration, enhancing the availability of observations, and developing and adopting community software systems. Additionally, we propose the establishment of an international community comprising environmental and social science researchers, statisticians, verification practitioners, and users to provide sustained support for this collective endeavor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS) is the flagship magazine of AMS and publishes articles of interest and significance for the weather, water, and climate community as well as news, editorials, and reviews for AMS members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信