{"title":"俄罗斯冰川地区的晚更新世相关性","authors":"V. Astakhov","doi":"10.1016/j.quaint.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a critical review of disputable chronostratigraphic results in the Upper Pleistocene of glaciated Russia including the West Siberian and Russian Plains. The main goal is to assess the validity of stratigraphic tools used for long-distance correlation of young sedimentary formations. The test is performed by comparison of i) Russian stratigraphic schemes of two last glacial cycles against the West European ones and ii) the traditional stratigraphic scales of Russia against the new chronological results brought up by modern dating tools. The multitude of AMS radiocarbon, optical luminescence, uranium series and electron-spin resonance dates obtained by international research projects allowed to reconsider the age of the main stratigraphic markers of Siberia which proved to be by one glacial cycle older than suggested by the traditional correlation schemes. The correlation wisdom in central European Russia for the time being cannot be satisfactorily revised using the statistical approach because of the limited supply of chronometric data. The palaeoenvironments inferred from palynological data in central European Russia are in discrepancy with the presumably coeval periglacial landscapes of Western and Central Europe. This divergence implies that the traditional chronostratigraphic correlation of the older Middle Valdaian interstadials with their Pleniglacial counterparts of MIS 3 stage is probably erroneous. The correlation errors mainly stem from the age underestimation by conventional radiocarbon dates used as chronological links of the Russian Pleistocene formations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49644,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Pleistocene correlations in glaciated Russia\",\"authors\":\"V. Astakhov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quaint.2024.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This is a critical review of disputable chronostratigraphic results in the Upper Pleistocene of glaciated Russia including the West Siberian and Russian Plains. The main goal is to assess the validity of stratigraphic tools used for long-distance correlation of young sedimentary formations. The test is performed by comparison of i) Russian stratigraphic schemes of two last glacial cycles against the West European ones and ii) the traditional stratigraphic scales of Russia against the new chronological results brought up by modern dating tools. The multitude of AMS radiocarbon, optical luminescence, uranium series and electron-spin resonance dates obtained by international research projects allowed to reconsider the age of the main stratigraphic markers of Siberia which proved to be by one glacial cycle older than suggested by the traditional correlation schemes. The correlation wisdom in central European Russia for the time being cannot be satisfactorily revised using the statistical approach because of the limited supply of chronometric data. The palaeoenvironments inferred from palynological data in central European Russia are in discrepancy with the presumably coeval periglacial landscapes of Western and Central Europe. This divergence implies that the traditional chronostratigraphic correlation of the older Middle Valdaian interstadials with their Pleniglacial counterparts of MIS 3 stage is probably erroneous. The correlation errors mainly stem from the age underestimation by conventional radiocarbon dates used as chronological links of the Russian Pleistocene formations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618224000284\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618224000284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这是对包括西西伯利亚和俄罗斯平原在内的俄罗斯冰川化上更新世有争议的年代地层学结果的批判性回顾。主要目的是评估用于年轻沉积构造远距离关联的地层工具的有效性。测试方法是将 i) 俄罗斯最后两个冰川周期的地层方案与西欧地层方案进行比较,以及 ii) 俄罗斯传统地层尺度与现代测年工具得出的新年代学结果进行比较。国际研究项目获得的大量 AMS 放射性碳、光学发光、铀系列和电子自旋共振日期,使人们得以重新考虑西伯利亚主要地层标志的年龄,事实证明这些地层标志的年龄比传统相关方案所建议的要早一个冰川周期。由于年代测定数据有限,目前还无法用统计方法对俄罗斯中欧地区的相关智慧进行令人满意的修正。根据俄罗斯中欧地区的古生物学数据推断出的古环境与西欧和中欧地区可能共生的围冰期地貌存在差异。这种差异意味着,传统的年代地层学将较早的中瓦尔代间冰期与其 MIS 3 阶段的冰期对应物相关联,很可能是错误的。相关性错误的主要原因是,作为俄罗斯更新世地层年代联系的传统放射性碳年代被低估了。
This is a critical review of disputable chronostratigraphic results in the Upper Pleistocene of glaciated Russia including the West Siberian and Russian Plains. The main goal is to assess the validity of stratigraphic tools used for long-distance correlation of young sedimentary formations. The test is performed by comparison of i) Russian stratigraphic schemes of two last glacial cycles against the West European ones and ii) the traditional stratigraphic scales of Russia against the new chronological results brought up by modern dating tools. The multitude of AMS radiocarbon, optical luminescence, uranium series and electron-spin resonance dates obtained by international research projects allowed to reconsider the age of the main stratigraphic markers of Siberia which proved to be by one glacial cycle older than suggested by the traditional correlation schemes. The correlation wisdom in central European Russia for the time being cannot be satisfactorily revised using the statistical approach because of the limited supply of chronometric data. The palaeoenvironments inferred from palynological data in central European Russia are in discrepancy with the presumably coeval periglacial landscapes of Western and Central Europe. This divergence implies that the traditional chronostratigraphic correlation of the older Middle Valdaian interstadials with their Pleniglacial counterparts of MIS 3 stage is probably erroneous. The correlation errors mainly stem from the age underestimation by conventional radiocarbon dates used as chronological links of the Russian Pleistocene formations.
期刊介绍:
Quaternary International is the official journal of the International Union for Quaternary Research. The objectives are to publish a high quality scientific journal under the auspices of the premier Quaternary association that reflects the interdisciplinary nature of INQUA and records recent advances in Quaternary science that appeal to a wide audience.
This series will encompass all the full spectrum of the physical and natural sciences that are commonly employed in solving Quaternary problems. The policy is to publish peer refereed collected research papers from symposia, workshops and meetings sponsored by INQUA. In addition, other organizations may request publication of their collected works pertaining to the Quaternary.