不同的死亡风险:死亡率是经济、社会、文化和个人资本的必然结果

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yuwei Qi , Sijmen A. Reijneveld , Josué Almansa , Sandra Brouwer , J. Cok Vrooman
{"title":"不同的死亡风险:死亡率是经济、社会、文化和个人资本的必然结果","authors":"Yuwei Qi ,&nbsp;Sijmen A. Reijneveld ,&nbsp;Josué Almansa ,&nbsp;Sandra Brouwer ,&nbsp;J. Cok Vrooman","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diverging death risks are associated with a wide range of social factors, including not only education and income but also other economic and non-economic resources. The aim of this study was to assess the association of mortality risks with four types of resources: economic, social, cultural and person capital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data of 2,952 participants from the Disparities in the Netherlands survey and annual mortality data from Statistics Netherlands for the period 2014 to 2021. <em>Economic capital</em> was measured through education, income, occupation, home equity, and liquid assets. <em>Social capital</em> was measured by the strength of social ties, the size of the core discussion network, and access to people in resourceful positions; <em>cultural capital</em> by lifestyle, digital skills, and mastery of English, and <em>person capital</em> by self-rated health, impediments to climbing stairs, self-confidence, self-image, people’s appearance, and body mass index. To accommodate the fact that each capital was derived from several indicators, we used Partial Least Squares (PLS) Cox Regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In multiple regression, higher economic, cultural, and person capital were associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.65 to 0.90], 0.77 [0.64–0.93] and 0.80; [0.70–0.92]), adjusted for all capital measures and sex.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The finding that more economic, cultural and person capital is associated with lower mortality provides empirical support for an approach that uses a broad spectrum of capital measures - hitherto rarely included simultaneously in epidemiological research - in order to understand diverging death risks. By integrating sociological concepts, cohort data, and epidemiological research methods, our study highlights the need for further research on the interplay between different forms of resources in shaping health inequalities. In designing public health interventions, we advocate the adoption of a multidimensional capital-based framework for tackling social disparities in mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000442/pdfft?md5=adb5773764e40752bf7ac67eb437226f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000442-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverging death risks: Mortality as a corollary of economic, social, cultural and person capital\",\"authors\":\"Yuwei Qi ,&nbsp;Sijmen A. Reijneveld ,&nbsp;Josué Almansa ,&nbsp;Sandra Brouwer ,&nbsp;J. Cok Vrooman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diverging death risks are associated with a wide range of social factors, including not only education and income but also other economic and non-economic resources. The aim of this study was to assess the association of mortality risks with four types of resources: economic, social, cultural and person capital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data of 2,952 participants from the Disparities in the Netherlands survey and annual mortality data from Statistics Netherlands for the period 2014 to 2021. <em>Economic capital</em> was measured through education, income, occupation, home equity, and liquid assets. <em>Social capital</em> was measured by the strength of social ties, the size of the core discussion network, and access to people in resourceful positions; <em>cultural capital</em> by lifestyle, digital skills, and mastery of English, and <em>person capital</em> by self-rated health, impediments to climbing stairs, self-confidence, self-image, people’s appearance, and body mass index. To accommodate the fact that each capital was derived from several indicators, we used Partial Least Squares (PLS) Cox Regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In multiple regression, higher economic, cultural, and person capital were associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.65 to 0.90], 0.77 [0.64–0.93] and 0.80; [0.70–0.92]), adjusted for all capital measures and sex.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The finding that more economic, cultural and person capital is associated with lower mortality provides empirical support for an approach that uses a broad spectrum of capital measures - hitherto rarely included simultaneously in epidemiological research - in order to understand diverging death risks. By integrating sociological concepts, cohort data, and epidemiological research methods, our study highlights the need for further research on the interplay between different forms of resources in shaping health inequalities. In designing public health interventions, we advocate the adoption of a multidimensional capital-based framework for tackling social disparities in mortality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000442/pdfft?md5=adb5773764e40752bf7ac67eb437226f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352827324000442-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ssm-Population Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827324000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:不同的死亡风险与多种社会因素有关,其中不仅包括教育和收入,还包括其他经济和非经济资源。本研究旨在评估死亡风险与四类资源(经济、社会、文化和个人资本)之间的关联。方法我们使用了荷兰差异调查中 2,952 名参与者的数据,以及荷兰统计局提供的 2014 年至 2021 年期间的年度死亡率数据。经济资本通过教育、收入、职业、房屋净值和流动资产来衡量。社会资本通过社会关系的强度、核心讨论网络的规模以及与有资源的人接触的机会来衡量;文化资本通过生活方式、数字技能和英语掌握情况来衡量;个人资本通过自评健康状况、爬楼梯障碍、自信心、自我形象、外貌和体重指数来衡量。结果在多元回归中,较高的经济、文化和个人资本与较低的死亡率相关(危险比为 0.77;95% 置信区间 [CI,0.65-0.90],0.77 [0.64-0.93]和 0.80;[0.70-0.92])。结论:更多的经济、文化和个人资本与更低的死亡率相关联,这一发现为使用广泛的资本衡量方法提供了经验支持--迄今为止,流行病学研究很少同时包括这些资本衡量方法--以了解不同的死亡风险。通过整合社会学概念、队列数据和流行病学研究方法,我们的研究强调了进一步研究不同形式的资源在形成健康不平等方面的相互作用的必要性。在设计公共卫生干预措施时,我们主张采用基于多维资本的框架来解决死亡率的社会差异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diverging death risks: Mortality as a corollary of economic, social, cultural and person capital

Introduction

Diverging death risks are associated with a wide range of social factors, including not only education and income but also other economic and non-economic resources. The aim of this study was to assess the association of mortality risks with four types of resources: economic, social, cultural and person capital.

Methods

We used data of 2,952 participants from the Disparities in the Netherlands survey and annual mortality data from Statistics Netherlands for the period 2014 to 2021. Economic capital was measured through education, income, occupation, home equity, and liquid assets. Social capital was measured by the strength of social ties, the size of the core discussion network, and access to people in resourceful positions; cultural capital by lifestyle, digital skills, and mastery of English, and person capital by self-rated health, impediments to climbing stairs, self-confidence, self-image, people’s appearance, and body mass index. To accommodate the fact that each capital was derived from several indicators, we used Partial Least Squares (PLS) Cox Regression.

Results

In multiple regression, higher economic, cultural, and person capital were associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.65 to 0.90], 0.77 [0.64–0.93] and 0.80; [0.70–0.92]), adjusted for all capital measures and sex.

Conclusion

The finding that more economic, cultural and person capital is associated with lower mortality provides empirical support for an approach that uses a broad spectrum of capital measures - hitherto rarely included simultaneously in epidemiological research - in order to understand diverging death risks. By integrating sociological concepts, cohort data, and epidemiological research methods, our study highlights the need for further research on the interplay between different forms of resources in shaping health inequalities. In designing public health interventions, we advocate the adoption of a multidimensional capital-based framework for tackling social disparities in mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信