膳食补充剂成分与普通他汀类药物在降低低密度脂蛋白方面的成本效益比较

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
C. Michael White , Ava Sedensky , Dakota Sicignano , Katelyn J. Galli
{"title":"膳食补充剂成分与普通他汀类药物在降低低密度脂蛋白方面的成本效益比较","authors":"C. Michael White ,&nbsp;Ava Sedensky ,&nbsp;Dakota Sicignano ,&nbsp;Katelyn J. Galli","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While statin therapy is the preferred treatment for hyperlipidemia, literature supports the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering effects associated with red yeast rice, berberine, and <em>Silybum marianum</em>. Dietary supplements may be perceived as a more affordable alternative to prescription medication.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We determined cost-effectiveness of generic pravastatin versus single-ingredient dietary supplements in relation to LDL lowering effect.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews was extracted to calculate pooled weighted mean LDL differences amongst generic pravastatin and single ingredient dietary supplements. The effect was then divided by average 30-day costs and compared amongst agents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The greatest difference was seen in pravastatin 40 mg [MD -57.88 mg/dL (95%CI: - 64.80 to −50.96)], followed by pravastatin 10 mg [MD -41.30 mg/dL (95%CI: 63.30 to - 19.40)], red yeast rice [MD -25.39 (95%CI: −32.98 to −17.81)], berberine [MD -15.13 (95%CI: −21.78 to −8.48)], and <em>Silybum marianum</em> [MD -9.51 mg/dL (95%CI: −22.13 to - 0.10)]. were divided by mean difference to calculate cost per mg/dL reduction in LDL. Cost-effectiveness was greatest for pravastatin 10 mg [$0.66/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.39 to $1.13)], followed by pravastatin 40 mg [$0.74/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.66 to $0.84)], berberine [$0.81/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.56 to $1.44)], red yeast rice [$0.84/mg/dL reduction (range: $0.67 to $1.13)], and <em>Silybum marianum</em> [$0.88/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.38 to $82.02)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pravastatin is most cost-effective in each scenario whether or not prescription insurance is utilized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000234/pdfft?md5=c8698cec4e62240bf3659316c0dc52bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of dietary supplement ingredients versus generic statins for LDL reduction\",\"authors\":\"C. Michael White ,&nbsp;Ava Sedensky ,&nbsp;Dakota Sicignano ,&nbsp;Katelyn J. Galli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While statin therapy is the preferred treatment for hyperlipidemia, literature supports the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering effects associated with red yeast rice, berberine, and <em>Silybum marianum</em>. Dietary supplements may be perceived as a more affordable alternative to prescription medication.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We determined cost-effectiveness of generic pravastatin versus single-ingredient dietary supplements in relation to LDL lowering effect.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews was extracted to calculate pooled weighted mean LDL differences amongst generic pravastatin and single ingredient dietary supplements. The effect was then divided by average 30-day costs and compared amongst agents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The greatest difference was seen in pravastatin 40 mg [MD -57.88 mg/dL (95%CI: - 64.80 to −50.96)], followed by pravastatin 10 mg [MD -41.30 mg/dL (95%CI: 63.30 to - 19.40)], red yeast rice [MD -25.39 (95%CI: −32.98 to −17.81)], berberine [MD -15.13 (95%CI: −21.78 to −8.48)], and <em>Silybum marianum</em> [MD -9.51 mg/dL (95%CI: −22.13 to - 0.10)]. were divided by mean difference to calculate cost per mg/dL reduction in LDL. Cost-effectiveness was greatest for pravastatin 10 mg [$0.66/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.39 to $1.13)], followed by pravastatin 40 mg [$0.74/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.66 to $0.84)], berberine [$0.81/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.56 to $1.44)], red yeast rice [$0.84/mg/dL reduction (range: $0.67 to $1.13)], and <em>Silybum marianum</em> [$0.88/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.38 to $82.02)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pravastatin is most cost-effective in each scenario whether or not prescription insurance is utilized.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000234/pdfft?md5=c8698cec4e62240bf3659316c0dc52bd&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000234-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然他汀类药物治疗是高脂血症的首选治疗方法,但也有文献支持红麴米、小檗碱和水飞蓟素具有降低低密度脂蛋白(LDL)的作用。我们确定了普通普伐他汀与单一成分膳食补充剂在降低低密度脂蛋白效果方面的成本效益。方法从荟萃分析和系统综述中提取数据,计算普通普伐他汀与单一成分膳食补充剂的加权平均低密度脂蛋白差异。用平均差除以低密度脂蛋白每降低 1 毫克/分升的成本。44 美元)]、红麴[0.84 美元/毫克/分升 LDL 降幅(范围:0.67 美元至 1.13 美元)]和水飞蓟[0.88 美元/毫克/分升 LDL 降幅(范围:0.38 美元至 82.02 美元)]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of dietary supplement ingredients versus generic statins for LDL reduction

Background

While statin therapy is the preferred treatment for hyperlipidemia, literature supports the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering effects associated with red yeast rice, berberine, and Silybum marianum. Dietary supplements may be perceived as a more affordable alternative to prescription medication.

Objective

We determined cost-effectiveness of generic pravastatin versus single-ingredient dietary supplements in relation to LDL lowering effect.

Methods

Data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews was extracted to calculate pooled weighted mean LDL differences amongst generic pravastatin and single ingredient dietary supplements. The effect was then divided by average 30-day costs and compared amongst agents.

Results

The greatest difference was seen in pravastatin 40 mg [MD -57.88 mg/dL (95%CI: - 64.80 to −50.96)], followed by pravastatin 10 mg [MD -41.30 mg/dL (95%CI: 63.30 to - 19.40)], red yeast rice [MD -25.39 (95%CI: −32.98 to −17.81)], berberine [MD -15.13 (95%CI: −21.78 to −8.48)], and Silybum marianum [MD -9.51 mg/dL (95%CI: −22.13 to - 0.10)]. were divided by mean difference to calculate cost per mg/dL reduction in LDL. Cost-effectiveness was greatest for pravastatin 10 mg [$0.66/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.39 to $1.13)], followed by pravastatin 40 mg [$0.74/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.66 to $0.84)], berberine [$0.81/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.56 to $1.44)], red yeast rice [$0.84/mg/dL reduction (range: $0.67 to $1.13)], and Silybum marianum [$0.88/mg/dL LDL reduction (range: $0.38 to $82.02)].

Conclusion

Pravastatin is most cost-effective in each scenario whether or not prescription insurance is utilized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信