使用 p16/Ki67 双染色法管理人类乳头瘤病毒检测呈阳性者的建议。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000802
Megan A Clarke, Nicolas Wentzensen, Rebecca B Perkins, Francisco Garcia, Deborah Arrindell, David Chelmow, Li C Cheung, Teresa M Darragh, Didem Egemen, Richard Guido, Warner Huh, Alexander Locke, Thomas S Lorey, Ritu Nayar, Carolann Risley, Debbie Saslow, Robert A Smith, Elizabeth R Unger, L Stewart Massad
{"title":"使用 p16/Ki67 双染色法管理人类乳头瘤病毒检测呈阳性者的建议。","authors":"Megan A Clarke, Nicolas Wentzensen, Rebecca B Perkins, Francisco Garcia, Deborah Arrindell, David Chelmow, Li C Cheung, Teresa M Darragh, Didem Egemen, Richard Guido, Warner Huh, Alexander Locke, Thomas S Lorey, Ritu Nayar, Carolann Risley, Debbie Saslow, Robert A Smith, Elizabeth R Unger, L Stewart Massad","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines Committee developed recommendations for dual stain (DS) testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology for use of DS to triage high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were calculated according to DS results among individuals testing HPV-positive using data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort and the STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES study in Mississippi. Management recommendations were based on clinical action thresholds developed for the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Resource usage metrics were calculated to support decision-making. Risk estimates in relation to clinical action thresholds were reviewed and used as the basis for draft recommendations. After an open comment period, recommendations were finalized and ratified through a vote by the Consensus Stakeholder Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For triage of positive HPV results from screening with primary HPV testing (with or without genotyping) or with cytology cotesting, colposcopy is recommended for individuals testing DS-positive. One-year follow-up with HPV-based testing is recommended for individuals testing DS-negative, except for HPV16- and HPV18-positive results, or high-grade cytology in cotesting, where immediate colposcopy referral is recommended. Risk estimates were similar between the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES populations. In general, resource usage metrics suggest that compared with cytology, DS requires fewer colposcopies and detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse earlier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual stain testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology is acceptable for triage of HPV-positive test results. Risk estimates are portable across different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for Use of p16/Ki67 Dual Stain for Management of Individuals Testing Positive for Human Papillomavirus.\",\"authors\":\"Megan A Clarke, Nicolas Wentzensen, Rebecca B Perkins, Francisco Garcia, Deborah Arrindell, David Chelmow, Li C Cheung, Teresa M Darragh, Didem Egemen, Richard Guido, Warner Huh, Alexander Locke, Thomas S Lorey, Ritu Nayar, Carolann Risley, Debbie Saslow, Robert A Smith, Elizabeth R Unger, L Stewart Massad\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines Committee developed recommendations for dual stain (DS) testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology for use of DS to triage high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were calculated according to DS results among individuals testing HPV-positive using data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort and the STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES study in Mississippi. Management recommendations were based on clinical action thresholds developed for the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Resource usage metrics were calculated to support decision-making. Risk estimates in relation to clinical action thresholds were reviewed and used as the basis for draft recommendations. After an open comment period, recommendations were finalized and ratified through a vote by the Consensus Stakeholder Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For triage of positive HPV results from screening with primary HPV testing (with or without genotyping) or with cytology cotesting, colposcopy is recommended for individuals testing DS-positive. One-year follow-up with HPV-based testing is recommended for individuals testing DS-negative, except for HPV16- and HPV18-positive results, or high-grade cytology in cotesting, where immediate colposcopy referral is recommended. Risk estimates were similar between the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES populations. In general, resource usage metrics suggest that compared with cytology, DS requires fewer colposcopies and detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse earlier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual stain testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology is acceptable for triage of HPV-positive test results. Risk estimates are portable across different populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000802\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:持久共识宫颈癌筛查和管理指南委员会制定了使用 CINtec PLUS Cytology 进行双重染色 (DS) 检测的建议,以使用 DS 分流高风险人乳头状瘤病毒 (HPV) 阳性结果:利用北加州凯撒医疗集团队列和密西西比州 "研究风险以改善差异"(STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES)研究的数据,根据 HPV 阳性患者的 DS 检测结果计算出宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级或更严重的风险。管理建议基于为 2019 年《美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学会基于风险的管理共识指南》制定的临床行动阈值。计算了资源使用指标以支持决策。审查了与临床行动阈值相关的风险估计值,并将其作为建议草案的基础。在公开征求意见期间,共识利益相关者小组通过投票最终确定并批准了建议:结果:对于初筛HPV检测(无论是否进行基因分型)或细胞学联合检测得出的HPV阳性结果,建议对DS阳性者进行阴道镜检查。建议对 DS 阴性检测者进行为期一年的 HPV 检测随访,但 HPV16 和 HPV18 阳性结果或细胞学联合检测中的高级别细胞学结果除外,建议立即转诊进行阴道镜检查。Kaiser Permanente 北加州和 STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES 群体的风险估计值相似。总体而言,资源使用指标表明,与细胞学相比,DS 需要的阴道镜检查次数更少,而且能更早发现 3 级或更严重的宫颈上皮内瘤变:结论:使用 CINtec PLUS Cytology 进行双重染色检测可用于分流 HPV 阳性检测结果。不同人群的风险估计值具有可移植性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for Use of p16/Ki67 Dual Stain for Management of Individuals Testing Positive for Human Papillomavirus.

Objectives: The Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines Committee developed recommendations for dual stain (DS) testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology for use of DS to triage high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive results.

Methods: Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were calculated according to DS results among individuals testing HPV-positive using data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort and the STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES study in Mississippi. Management recommendations were based on clinical action thresholds developed for the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Resource usage metrics were calculated to support decision-making. Risk estimates in relation to clinical action thresholds were reviewed and used as the basis for draft recommendations. After an open comment period, recommendations were finalized and ratified through a vote by the Consensus Stakeholder Group.

Results: For triage of positive HPV results from screening with primary HPV testing (with or without genotyping) or with cytology cotesting, colposcopy is recommended for individuals testing DS-positive. One-year follow-up with HPV-based testing is recommended for individuals testing DS-negative, except for HPV16- and HPV18-positive results, or high-grade cytology in cotesting, where immediate colposcopy referral is recommended. Risk estimates were similar between the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES populations. In general, resource usage metrics suggest that compared with cytology, DS requires fewer colposcopies and detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse earlier.

Conclusions: Dual stain testing with CINtec PLUS Cytology is acceptable for triage of HPV-positive test results. Risk estimates are portable across different populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信